Indiana’s Major Moves Projects Asphalt Pavement Association of Indiana

1. Indiana’sMajor Moves Projects Asphalt Pavement Associationof Indiana Michael B. Cline, P.E., PTOE Commissioner INDOT December 13, 2012

2. INDOT Profile • Six district offices • 3,630 employees • 1,600 Highway Technicians • 800 Managers/Supervisors • 300 Engineers • $389 million/annual operating budget • $1 billion/annual capital expenditures • 28,400 total roadway lane miles • 5,300 INDOT-owned bridges

3. Customer Satisfaction Survey Items that residents thought were critical for INDOT.

4. Contractor Satisfaction Survey Satisfaction Levels with INDOT’s Performance Regarding Communication & Cooperation.

5. Contractor Satisfaction Survey Satisfaction levels with INDOT’s performance regarding communication & cooperation.

6. 2012 INDOT Awards

7. INDOT Investment FY 2006-15

8. Interstate Truck Trends

9. Pavement & Bridge Preservation

10. Major Moves Projects Total 199 $2.9B

11. Major Moves – Ribbon Cutting • Hoosier Heartland (SR 25) • 36 miles • Ribbon cuttings: • Oct. 24, 2012: • 12 miles – I-65 to US 421 • December 2013: • 24 miles – US 421 to US 24 • Open to traffic: Dec. 2013 • CN Cost: $327 million Hoosier Heartland at Clymers, Cass County.

12. Major Moves – Ribbon Cutting • Fort to Port(US 24) • 11 miles • Open to traffic: Nov. 14, 2012 • CN Cost: $93 million US 24/Fort to Port at Webster Road, Allen County.

13. Major Moves – Ribbon Cutting • Interstate 69 • Sections 1-3: 67 miles • Evansville to Crane • Open to traffic:Nov. 19, 2012 • CN Cost: $620 million I-69, Daviess County.

14. Major Moves • US 31 Hamilton County • 13 miles • 16% let • Final letting: Spring 2013 • Open to traffic: Dec. 2015 • CN Cost: $320 million US 31 at SR 38, Hamilton County.

15. Major Moves • Interstate 69 • Section 4: 27 miles • Crane to Bloomington • 79% let • Bid openings: • Segment 3: Dec. 12, 2012 • Segment 2: March 2013 • Open to traffic: Dec. 2014 • Est. CN Cost: $400 million

16. Major Moves • Interstate 69 • Section 5: 21 miles • Bloomington to Martinsville • DEIS published: Oct. 26, 2012 • RFI issued: Dec. 4, 2012 • Public hearing: Dec. 6, 2012 • ROD anticipated: Spring 2013 • Construction to start: FY 2014 • Est. CN Cost: $350 million

17. P3 Projects - Ohio River Bridges • Total Cost: $2.6 billion • Federal ROD approval:June 20, 2012 • Kentucky: Downtown Crossing • Indiana: East End Crossing • East End Groundbreaking:Aug. 30, 2012 • Public Hearing: Dec. 1, 2012 • IFA Determination: Dec. 3, 2012 • Open to Traffic: October 2016

18. P3 Projects - East End Crossing Indiana Sections

19. P3 Projects - Illiana Corridor • 48 miles from I-55 to I-65 • Tolled expressway • Environmental Impact Study • Preferred Route B3 announced Oct. 18, 2012 • Tier One ROD anticipated in January 2013 • Tier Two ROD anticipated in July 2014

20. Pavement Conditions Pavement Condition Ratings are measured by Road Roughness, using the International Roughness Index (IRI). Projected In 2011, 3,060 of INDOT’s Lane Miles were in Fair or Poor Condition. If Preservation Spending Levels Remain Constant, it is Estimated that 4,445 Lane Miles will be Rated Fair or Poor by 2022, an Increase of 1,385 Miles (45%). 16

21. Federal Highway Bill (MAP-21) • Indiana Impact: • FY 2013: $923M • FY 2014: $931M • Effective Date: October 1, 2012 • Increased TIFIA program • Increased tolling ability for new & addedcapacity projects • New performance measures & assetmanagement requirements

22. Pavement Selection Process • Based on appropriate pavement treatment design • Existing pavement type, thickness & distress level • Ability of possible solutions to address the problem, situation or pavement distresses present • Near-term and long-term cost effectiveness • Construction costs • Least cost of ownership • Right treatment, right time, right cost • Engineering feasibility • 1&1/2” resurface vs. 8” resurface vs. reconstruct, etc. • Business case suitability • Interstate vs. minor state highway • Budgetary impacts acceptability

23. Pavement Selection Process • Considers not just HMA or PCCP, but also possible & feasible treatment levels of intensity • Basic levels of intensity are: • Routine or preventive maintenance • Surface treatment • Chip-seal, PPI, mill-&-fill, etc. • Minor structural treatment • 2-lift overlay • Major structural treatment • Rubberize, thick HMA or PCCP overlay • Pavement construction or replacement

24. Pavement Peer Group • Pavement Steering Committee Successor • District pavement engineers & pavement area engineers are pavement owners • Everyone else works to support them • Forum for broad discussion of pavement issues so pavement owners can make decisions • To include agency, engineering consultants, construction industry, etc.

25. Chapter 304 Revisions • Incorporate new agency pavement organization, i.e., district pavement engineers, pavement area engineers, etc. • Incorporate new Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) philosophy & methodology (Darwin M-E software) • More clearly delineate pavement treatment, selection expectations for internal & external designers • Reflect increase reliance on pavement design engineers’ professional judgment

26. Alternate Bidding • HMA & PCCP options considered • Best results when alternate pavement type considerations determined early in project development • 9% (+/-) construction savings typically • No longer FHWA experiment, Pavement Selection Process • Continued discussion on lower limit • Future looking into alternate treatments at PPI level?

27. Thank You