1 / 27

Discussant’s Comments: “India and the 12 th Plan: Reaping the Demographic Dividend”

Discussant’s Comments: “India and the 12 th Plan: Reaping the Demographic Dividend”. Anjini Kochar Stanford Center for International Development. Abhijit’s presentation: .

hateya
Download Presentation

Discussant’s Comments: “India and the 12 th Plan: Reaping the Demographic Dividend”

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Discussant’s Comments: “India and the 12th Plan: Reaping the Demographic Dividend” AnjiniKochar Stanford Center for International Development

  2. Abhijit’s presentation: • Notes our failures in health and primary education, and the ineffectiveness of government programs - ICDS, AWCs, PDS, government primary schools, PHCs, ASHA worker, etc. • Solutions: food fortification, micronutrients, immunization, nutritional awareness, dedicated reading time, curriculum change, tracking, ICT, etc.

  3. Key question: If previous government programs failed, why would a new set do any better? • Same failure in the 12th Plan – no shortage of ideas of what has to be done. • Implicit assumption: Govt programs did not work in the past because they were the “wrong” programs. • Alternative explanation: inability of the govt to deliver services.

  4. 3 points • Severe shortage of human capital – doctors, teachers -- makes it impossible to deliver government services • Centralized planning (or centralized norms) • Lack of planning, implementation failures

  5. Illustrate the first point in context of Malnutrition in Bihar • Abhijit has already presented data on Bihar • ICDS is ineffective. • Why? • National norm: one AWC for every 800 population. In most districts of Bihar, this is not the case.

  6. Population per AWC in one block, Araria District, Bihar(mean=1244, min=400, max=400096% of AWCs serve a population greater than the norm)Result: most people don’t use AWCs

  7. Number of students covered per day in school visits, district Bhagalpur, PHC Bihpur (mean=378, max=900)

  8. Number of students covered per day, Khagaria district, PHC Beldour(mean=354, max=1400)

  9. 2. Centralized policies • School policies that compensate small schools for their initial disadvantages – multi-grade instruction and low SES of schooling community • (Kochar 2012): finds no negative effect of multi-grade instruction, but significant class size effects. • So, smaller classes in small schools should overcome disadvantage of low SES • Except that, in Karnataka, village size – and hence school size – is significantly smaller in the more developed South.

  10. Village size, North and South Karnataka

  11. School size, survey data, North and South Karnataka

  12. 3. Implementation • Nali Kali program in Karnataka – activity based learning • Combines students from grades 1, 2. • Children sorted by ability and work at their own pace • Learning through “steps” and “milestones” and proceed to next step only after mastery of previous one • Children constantly monitor their own progress on learning charts • Emphasis on activities and learning through activities

  13. Effect on Cognitive and Non-cognitive skills A 1 year increase in years of exposure to NK increases lang and math test scores by approximately 2 percentage points

  14. Why relatively little effect on learning? • Could say that it was the wrong program and need new programs • But, implementation: Program was announced in May 2009, and implemented in June 2009 on scale • Lack of materials, training • In 2010 – extended to grade 3, with plan of extending to grade 4 in 2011 • Teacher agitation in 2010-2011 against extension, demanding scale back to grades 1 and 2 • Decision regarding the program was made only in May 2012 (a few weeks prior to school starting) • Did not scale back, but kept it to grades 1-3

  15. Teacher understanding of basic NK principles, 2012 (mean=77, std. dev=19) In Northern districts: 40% of teachers scored less than 75 (18% <60) In South: 27% scored less than 75 (10% <60)

  16. Conclusion • Even if something works in a pilot, very different when the program is taken to scale • Then, all the problems of weak institutions, lack of human capital come into place, making implementation very difficult • Main point: failure of most programs may have more to do with implementation, than with the program itself • Unless this is addressed, seems senseless to go on implementing new programs every year.

More Related