1 / 13

Three Basic Fallacies

Three Basic Fallacies. All the fallacies we deal with are forms of three basic fallacies:. - Irrelevant Reason . - Hasty Conclusion. - Problematic Premise . Irrelevant Reason (relevant?). Also called “Non-Sequitur” (“It does not follow”). The arguer puts forth a

hazel
Download Presentation

Three Basic Fallacies

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Three Basic Fallacies • All the fallacies we • deal with are forms of • three basic fallacies: - Irrelevant Reason - Hasty Conclusion - Problematic Premise

  2. Irrelevant Reason (relevant?) • Also called “Non-Sequitur” • (“It does not follow”) • The arguer puts forth a • premise which, though it • may be true, has nothing to • do with the conclusion.

  3. Irrelevant Reason E.g.: A former Health Minister, when asked in the Commons about the food value of Corn Flakes, responded: “The milk you have with your Corn Flakes has great nutritional value.”

  4. Hasty Conclusion (sufficient?) • Even when the premises are • relevant, they may not give • enough evidence to support • the conclusion. • Beware of anecdotal • evidence -- relying on only • one or two “incidents.”

  5. Hasty Conclusion E.g.: “University profs really have it pretty easy. We have a cottage next door to a prof, & he’s there from late April right through September, fishing and relaxing.”

  6. Problematic Premise (acceptable?) • Each premise of an argument • should be defended, unless it • is already clearly true because • it is common knowledge, or • offered by an expert witness, • or is only being offered for • the sake of argument, etc.

  7. Problematic Premise E.g.: “Many young people who today hold responsible jobs were once the recipient of the lash, & if there are any bleeding hearts who think this is callous and inhuman, let them read Proverbs …”

  8. To Sum Up: • Irrelevant reason is a strong • charge: an argument guilty of • it must be abandoned, and • the arguer must start over.

  9. To Sum Up: • Hasty Conclusion is a weaker • charge; it just means more • evidence needs to be given • before the conclusion can be • accepted -- not that the basic • argument and conclusion are • necessarily wrong.

  10. To Sum Up: • Problematic Premise is the • weakest charge of all: it just • means the arguer needs to • supply more evidence for one of • his or her premises.

  11. To SumUp: • an argument is not a fight; • it is an attempt to show • evidence in support of a • position or belief • an informal fallacy is an • argument with problems • in its premises

  12. To Sum Up: Remember: It is not enough to label an argument a fallacy -- you must be able to explain why the argument is fallacious.

  13. Source: Adapted from Johnson, R.H. and Blair, J.A. Logical Self-Defense (First Edition). Toronto, McGraw-Hill Ryerson, 1977

More Related