210 likes | 225 Views
The H ICAT Optical Catalogue H OPCAT. Marianne T. Doyle Ph.D. Project. Content. Supervisor : Michael J. Drinkwater – UQ Assoc. Supervisors : Elaine Sadler – Uni Sydney John Ross - UQ Collaborators David J. Rohde - UQ Mike Read – WFAU Edinburgh Baerbel Koribalski – ATNF, Epping
E N D
The HICAT Optical CatalogueHOPCAT Marianne T. Doyle Ph.D. Project
Content Supervisor: Michael J. Drinkwater – UQ Assoc. Supervisors: Elaine Sadler – Uni Sydney John Ross - UQ Collaborators David J. Rohde - UQ Mike Read – WFAU Edinburgh Baerbel Koribalski – ATNF, Epping HIPASS Team – ATNF Parkes & Epping, Universities of : Melbourne, Cardiff, Western Sydney Macarthur, Wales, Swinburne, Technology Sydney, New Mexico, Manchester, Colorado, Sydney, Leicester ASTRON The Netherlands, AAO Sydney, WIYN Tucson etc…....... • Input Data • Matching Process • Magnitude Calibration • Results • Candidate Dark Galaxies?
Radio-Optical Position Uncertainty Input Data • RADIO DATA • HIPASS Catalogue - HICAT - 4315 radio HI detected sources • Meyer et. Al 2004 (Paper I ) & Zwaan et. Al 2004 (Paper II ) • OPTICAL IMAGES • SuperCOSMOS 15’ x 15’ Images • 7’ radius Radio-Optical position uncertainty • IMAGE ANALYSIS • SExtractor Image Analysis • SuperCOSMOS data catalogue? • Ellipse segmentation problem for extended objects • SExtractor Segmentation problems? • Used 2 sets of ellipse analysis parameters
Input Data • Velocities to Confirm Optical Matches • NED (NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database) • Only optical and high resolution radio measured velocities used • 6dFGS • Non-public data as at 4th September, 2003 • Hicat sources were included in survey
Matching Process • ADRIC Interactive Program written by David Rohde • Find optical counterpart by choosing galaxy ellipse by: • Confirming HICAT velocities with published velocities • Without velocity confirmation • Only galaxy in image • Proximity to HICAT position • Velocity width …. • Visually matched by 3 people • Marianne Doyle • Michael Drinkwater • David Rohde
Selectionparameters Original HICAT parameters 15 x 15 arcmin images to allow for the 7 arcmin position uncertainty Centred on HICAT positions Superimposed ellipses Yellow for correct match Superimposed and listed Published velocities
Magnitude Calibration • SuperCOSMOS data catalogue - Calibrated • SExtractor magnitudes - Uncalibrated • Use the relationship between the SuperCOSMOS & SExtractor magnitudes for calibration • SuperCOSMOS Plate to Plate differences/Zero-point calibration • Analysed every object of 4315 blue images • Matched Galaxies To calculate magnitude calibrationvalues
ResultsAnalysis of 4315 Radio Sources - 84% identified Velocity Match44%1882 • With published velocity • Good Guesses20% 851 • But no published velocity • Velocity Multi Match 14% 634 • Compact group of galaxies with published velocity • Good Guess Multi Match 6%256 • Compact group of galaxies no velocity • No Guess 11% 476 • Several galaxies no velocities • Blank Field 5%216 • No visible galaxy
Integrated Radio flux and Apparent Blue Magnitudes • Totally independent variables • Correlation shown • Higher the blue magnitude - Higher Radio Flux Log HIPASS Peak Flux Vs Optical Apparent Magnitude Objects matched by published velocities, educated guesses without velocity and velocity matches where multiple galaxies match.
Position difference between the synthetic point sources & the fitted position after parameterization Difference between Radio and Optical Positions Velocity Matched (Zwaan et.al 2004) HICAT Vs HOPCAT Position Uncertainties
Extinction Cut at 0.6 Candidate Dark Galaxies? • 65 Possible but 58 in crowded fields • 7 possible candidates for dark galaxies? • 1 possibly HVC with ATCA Observation by Rachel Webster • HIPASSJ1351-46Vel=528 km s-1 (C638) • 2 previously observed at ATCA by Bärbel Koribalski • HIPASSJ0940-42Vel = 2268 km s-1 (C942) • HIPASSJ0902-40 Vel = 1636 km s-1 (C781) • 4 remaining HICAT Name Velocity (km s-1) Extinction (Schlegel) HIPASSJ1946-48 7730 0.0402 HIPASSJ1317-73 5666 0.286 HIPASSJ0643-16 2797 0.5503 HIPASSJ1638-15 7457 0.5096
HIPASSJ1946-48 B=349.7205˚ L=-28.8053˚ Vel=7730 km s-1 Ext= 0.0402 MHI=1.3x1010Msolar
Calculate SFE & relate to galaxy morphology Use Infrared & Radio Continuum to measure SFR Determine which theory contributes toward the Morphology-density relation Determine local galaxy density What’s Next • ATCA 21cm high resolution observation • Feb 24-27 & March 3-9 2005 • 178.5 hours • All helpers with observing welcome!!!! Optical matching process Completed HOPCAT
Thank you for your attention Lagoon Nebula 100LY across Contains many young stars & hot gas
Difference between Radio and Optical Positions for Velocity Matches Difference between Radio and Optical Positions for Good Guesses Radio-Optical Separations 50
Difference between Radio and Optical Positions for Multiple Velocity & Good Guesses Matches Difference between Radio and Optical Positions for Velocity Matches Radio-Optical Separations 50
HI Peaks Optical Peak Position Radio-Optical Position Difference
HIPASSJ1317-73 b = 304.8596˚ l = -10.3882˚ Vel=5666 km s-1 Ext= 0.286 MHI=5.7x109Msolar
HIPASSJ0643-16 b = 226.5693˚ l = -8.8849 ˚ Vel =2797 km s-1 Ext = 0.5503 MHI=3.1x109Msolar
HIPASSJ1638-15 b = 2.047˚ l = 20.3829˚ Vel=7457 km s-1 Ext= 0.5096 MHI2.2x1010Msolar