470 likes | 590 Views
Pro Forma Summary. AGEC 489-689 Spring 2010. Timeline Required for Capital Budgeting…. Assume it is the year 2009 and John Deere wants to project farm machinery and equipment sales over the next six years to determine if plant expansion is necessary.
E N D
Pro Forma Summary AGEC 489-689Spring 2010
Timeline Required for Capital Budgeting… Assume it is the year 2009 and John Deere wants to project farm machinery and equipment sales over the next six years to determine if plant expansion is necessary. 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Capital budgeting models of investment decisions require projections of the annual revenue and cost values over the entire 2010 to 2015 time period. Page 89 in booklet
Remember the definition of annual net cash flows Page 74 in booklet
Must project Annual yield Must project Annual price Page 85 in booklet
Ad Hoc Modeling Approaches • Naïve model – using last year’s prices, costs and yields • Simple linear trend extrapolation of historical prices, costs and yields • Moving Olympic average • Using assumptions made by others
Ad Hoc Modeling Approaches Naïve model: Pt = Pt-1 Linear trend: Pt = a0 + a1(Year) Olympic average: Pt = Last 5 year annual price, dropping high and low and calculate the average of the remaining three year’s price. All three approaches were shown last week to perform poorly in markets exhibiting price variability.
Econometric Model Approach • Capturing future supply/demand impacts on prices and unit costs • Linkages to commodity policy • Linkages to domestic economy • Linkages to the global economy
D D S S Crop Market Equilibrium Price S D • Supply consists of: • Beginning stocks • Production • Imports Pe • Demand consists of: • Industrial use • Feed use • Exports • Ending stocks Quantity Qe Page 45 in booklet
Forecasting Future Commodity Price Trends D $7 S D = a – bP + cYD + eX $4 Own price Other factors Disposable income $1 10 Page 45 in booklet
Forecasting Future Commodity Price Trends D $7 S Own price Input costs Other factors $4 S = n + mP – rC + sZ $1 10 Page 46 in booklet
Projecting Commodity Price D $7 S D = 10 – 6P + .3YD + 1.2X D = S $4 S = 2 + 4P – .2C + 1.02Z $1 10 Substitute the demand and supply equations into the the equilibrium condition and solve for price Page 46 in booklet
Point Forecast Assumptions Assumes perfect knowledge of outcomes in all 5 areas!!!! PE QE Page 47 in booklet
Structural Pro Forma Analysis Supply-side risk for a given price… PE Page 47 in booklet QLQEQH
Structural Pro Forma Analysis Demand and supply-side risk and potential price variability… PH PE PL QE Page 47 in booklet
$2.50 $3.00 $3.50 Triangular Probability Distribution Page 131 in booklet
Conclusions • Econometric models preferred over naïve models and linear time trend models. • Much more accurate. • Provide much more information (e.g., elasticities). • Allow for sensitivity analysis with independent (exogenous) variables when evaluating potential variability about expected trends.
Allowing for unequal annual net cash flows…. Page 79 in booklet
Allowing for unequal discount rates… Page 63 in booklet
Adjusting Discount Rate • We said to date that the discount rate is the firm’s opportunity rate of return. • Realistically we must allow for business risk by including a business risk premium. • Realistically we must also allow for financial risk by adding an additional financial risk premium.
Business Risk • Risk associated with price of the product or products you are producing. • Risk associated with the unit costs for the inputs used in producing the product(s). • Risk associated with yields (productivity) in production. • NCFi=Piyieldsiunit sales – Ciunit inputs
Accounting for Business Risk RRRH,i RRRL,i RFREE,i .05 RFREE,i = risk free rate of return (i.e., govt. bond rate) RRRL,i = required rate of return for lowly risk averse RRRH,i = required rate of return for highly risk averse Page 132 in booklet
Increasing Risk Over Time Probability Product price distribution E(P) Year 1 Year 1 Year 10 Year 10 $2.95 $3.05 $3.15 Pessimistic price Expected price Optimistic price
Increasing Risk Over Time Probability Product price distribution E(P) Year 1 Year 10 Year 1 Year 10 $2.05 $2.95 $3.05 $3.15 $4.05 Pessimistic price Expected price Optimistic price
Financial Risk • Risk associated with low used borrowing capacity (remember we captures this in the implicit cost of capital). • Risk associated with increasing explicit cost of debt capital relative to ROA. We discussed this when analyzing the economic growth model: ROE = [(r – i)L + r](1 – tx)(1 – w)
Accounting for Financial Risk RRRi RRRi RFREE,i .05 Page 138 in booklet
Required Rate of Return • For the purposes of this course, we will measure the annual required rates of return based upon a subjective methods. • Ask yourself what additional return you require above a risk-free rate given your perceived annual business risk. • Ask yourself what additional return you require given existing leverage position. • RRRi = Rfree,i + Rbusiness,i + Rfinancial,i
One Strategy to Minimizing Risk Exposure Page 140 in booklet
The Portfolio Effect NCFi NCF with existing assets NCF with new assets Forecast horizon
The Portfolio Effect NCFi Average annual NCF after making new investment. Forecast horizon This allows use to lower the business risk premium associated with the calculated the NPV for the new investment project. Exchanging stable profits for lowering exposure to risk.
Allowing for unequal annual net cash flows and required rates of return…. Page 63 in booklet
Our Complete NPV Capital Budgeting Model Discounted NCF in year 1 NPV = NCF1[1/(1+RRR1)] + NCF2[1/(1+RRR1)(1+RRR2)] + … + NCFn[1/(1+RRR1)(1+RRR2)…(1+RRRn)] + T[1/(1+RRR1)(1+RRR2)…(1+RRRn)] – tx(T – C)[1/(1+RRR1)(1+RRR2)…(1+RRRn)] Discounted NCF in year 2 Discounted NCF in year n Discounted terminal value Discounted capital gains tax Decision rule: NPV > 0 suggests project is economically feasible NPV = 0 suggests indifference NPV < 0 suggests project is economically infeasible
* * Page 106 in booklet
* * Page 107 in booklet
Borrowing planning • Up to date financial statements. • Demonstrate trends in key financial ratios including debt repayment coverage. • Pro forma master budget before and after proposed investment, including the line of credit or LOC. • Do sensitivity analysis. • Demonstrate feasibility of investment plans by using NPV capital budgeting using stress testing and incorporation of risk.
Team Presentations • We said in the syllabus at the start of the semester that the class will be divided into teams of 4 students. • Half of the teams will be borrowers either starting a new business or expanding one. • The other teams will be lenders deciding whether or not to lend to the borrowing teams. • The material covered thus far has dealt with analyses borrowing teams can employ in justifying an application for a loan. • The second half of this course will focus on loan and portfolio analysis techniques to be employed by each of the lending teams.
Both Sides of the Desk • The borrower: • Enterprise analysis • Cash management • Line of credit needs • Operating loan application • Investment planning • Term loan application • Planning for long run Coverage thus far this semester
Both Sides of the Desk • The borrower: • Enterprise analysis • Cash management • Line of credit needs • Operating loan application • Investment planning • Term loan application • Planning for long run • The lender: • Loan application analysis • Credit scoring • Loan pricing for risk • Loan approval process • Loan portfolio analysis • Loan loss reserves • Regulatory oversight • Lending institutions serving • commercial agriculture and • rural businesses. After mid-term exam