1 / 8

Academic Council Tenure Committee Recommendation - Tenure Review Procedures April 24, 2007

Committee Members: Bruce McMillin, CS – Chair Caroline Fisher, Business Ann Miller Electrical & Computer Eng A.I. Liapis, Chemical & Biol Gerald Cohen,Arts, Languages, & Phil Don Sharpsteen, Psychology Doug Carroll, Interdisciplinary Eng Nuran Ercal, Chemistry Norbert Maerz, Geol

hermelindas
Download Presentation

Academic Council Tenure Committee Recommendation - Tenure Review Procedures April 24, 2007

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Committee Members: Bruce McMillin, CS – Chair Caroline Fisher, Business Ann Miller Electrical & Computer Eng A.I. Liapis, Chemical & Biol Gerald Cohen,Arts, Languages, & Phil Don Sharpsteen, Psychology Doug Carroll, Interdisciplinary Eng Nuran Ercal, Chemistry Norbert Maerz, Geol Arvind Kumar,Mining & Nuclear Eng Ralph Alexander, Physics Steve Clark, Math/Stat H.L. Tsai, MAE Cihan Dagli, Eng Mgt & Systems Eng Craig Adams, CARE Greg Gelles, Economics& Finance Richard Hall, IST Tseggi Isaac, History & Pol Sci Greg Hilmas, Mat, Sci & Engr Yue-wern Huang, Biological Sciences Kris Swenson, English & Tech Comm Academic Council Tenure Committee Recommendation - Tenure Review ProceduresApril 24, 2007

  2. Committee Committee Appeal Appeal Appeal Committee The Proposed Process The Current Process Campus (Provost) School/College (Dean) Area Subcommittee Department (Chair) Candidate

  3. Rationale • Review by area assures a cohesive and knowledgeable level of review • Global oversight is necessary to ensure that criteria and candidates meet campus standards • As administrator needs to be the point of contact for disputes

  4. C.1 – Campus Review Committee • Elected faculty from each department • Full tenured professors exclusive of any administrator with decision-making authority over faculty which includes, but is not limited to, chairs, vice provosts, provosts, and the chancellor, or • Associate professors from the department who recuse themselves, or • a Tenured faculty member • Why no administrators? • Undue Influence • Double voting • The Provost will serve as the administrative liaison to the committee.

  5. Initial Area Proposal • Social Sciences: Business, Psychology, Economics & Finance • Sciences: Biological Sciences, Computer Science, Chemistry, Information Science and Technology, Mathematics and Statistics, Physics • Engineering: Chemical and Biological, Civil, Architectural and Environmental, Electrical and Computer, Engineering Management/Systems Engineering, Geological Sciences and Engineering, Interdisciplinary,, Materials Science and Engineering, Mechanical and Aerospace, Mining and Nuclear and Engineering • Arts and Humanities: Arts Languages and Philosophy, English, History & Political Science

  6. Comments?

  7. Committee Committee Appeal Advocate Committee For Future Study Campus (Provost) Area Subcommittee Department (Chair) Candidate

  8. Other Work • 3rd Year Review Procedures

More Related