1 / 8

Post Tenure Review

Post Tenure Review. Personnel Rules for Faculty - review pages 3-113-3-117 Faculty/Staff Handbook - review pages 69, 108-116. Principles. Tenured faculty…responsible for developing his/her individual performance objectives in collaboration with the immediate supervisor

emele
Download Presentation

Post Tenure Review

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Post Tenure Review Personnel Rules for Faculty - review pages 3-113-3-117 Faculty/Staff Handbook - review pages 69, 108-116

  2. Principles • Tenured faculty…responsible for developing his/her individual performance objectives in collaboration with the immediate supervisor • Performance evaluation at least once every 5 years… but no more frequently than once every 12 months at the request of either the faculty or supervisor • Focus should be on the accomplishment of performance objectives and overall performance in regard to professional expectations

  3. Performance Objectives Timeframe • Each year, faculty are to submit performance objectives to the immediate supervisor at least once every five years…by May 1st of the year the individual is recommended for tenure and every five years thereafter • Supervisors are to review performance objectives by Sept. 1 and discuss those with the Dean

  4. If inadequate, between Sept. 1 and Oct. 15, supervisor reviews performance objective with faculty and apprise him/her of the weaknesses of those objectives • At least one interim meeting, or more often if requested by either party, each five year period to review…revise objectives…

  5. Performance Objectives • Performance objectives…1) ensure continuing growth and development…2) offer encouragement to explore new ways of promoting academic excellence and 3) improves…deficiencies • Include expectations in: individual, department/unit, college/school, university based activities and/or other collaborative activities

  6. Performance Evaluation Timeframe • Supervisor assigns a rating and provides to Dean by November 1st • Dean reviews, approves and forwards to Provost by November 15th • Provost reviews, approves and forward to HR by December 1st

  7. Performance Evaluations • Supervisor assigns rating: • Meritorious (above); • Adequate (within) • Inadequate (below) • …the supervisor should look for exceptional aspects of performance (either good or poor). If the data do not contain evidence of such, it may be assumed that the person is performing within an acceptable range for his/her position. • The basis for the performance evaluation • the degree of accomplishment of the faculty member’s individual performance objectives and • overall performance in relationship to professional expectations as listed in the faculty member’s job description

  8. Various kinds of data, from sources who are in a position to know of the person’s performance, will be used for making the evaluation…peer ratings, classroom peer observations, supervisor’s ratings… For instructional faculty, student ratings must be considered • …split assignment…, each supervisor will make an evaluation

More Related