1 / 11

Data collection on e-government in Arab countries

This article discusses the importance of data collection on e-government in Arab countries, including its role in providing a clear overview of progress, self-assessment of challenges, evidence-based decision making, and sharing best practices. It presents an approach to data collection through country presentations, questionnaires, and thematic seminars, and highlights available data on e-government frameworks. The article also proposes next steps for more extensive and focused data collection.

hesterk
Download Presentation

Data collection on e-government in Arab countries

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 4th Meeting of the Working Group on E-Government and Administrative Simplification (Tunis, 29 May 2008) Data collection on e-government in Arab countries Marco Daglio Administrator Governance for Development Initiative in Arab countries OECD Marco.daglio@oecd.org

  2. Why data collection on e-government? • Clear overview of progress made • Self-assessment of existing challenges and identifiation of directions for change • Provide evidence-based input to decision makers • Illustrate good experiences and practices that can be shared among Arab countries

  3. Approach with data collection • Start small.. • country presentations • country questionnaire • booklets on thematic seminars

  4. What do we know ? Overview of available data (as of March 2007) • ..BUT WHAT ABOUT DATA • ON E-GOVERNMENT • FRAMEWORKS ? • - coordination / collaboration • legislative / regulatory • budgetary • technical • ..

  5. Data on e-government frameworks (1): distribution of e-government portfolios • *Notes: • In Oman, the Information Technology Authority (ITA) has responsibility for e-government. It is an autonomous body affiliated with the Minister of National Economy. It has both financial and administrative independence in its operations. • In Bahrain, the Supreme Committee for Information and Communication Technology (SCICT) is responsible for e-government in the Kingdom. The Committee is chaired by H.H the Deputy Prime Minister and consists of a panel of key Cabinet ministers. • In Qatar, a Supreme Council for Information and Communication Technologies has responsibility for e-government development. • In Sudan, the National Information Centre (NIC) has been created within the Ministry of the Council of Ministers to establish a national information policy and develop use of ICT in government • In Kuwait, a central body called the Central Agency for Information Technology has been created under the leadership of the Minister of State for the Council of Ministers Affairs. • In Dubai, the eGovernment Unit reports to the Dubai Ruler’s office

  6. Data on e-government frameworks (2): Legislative and regulatory

  7. Data on e-government frameworks (3): measurement and evalution

  8. Data on e-government frameworks (4): national e-government portals Legenda: IS: provide information on services (e.g. availability online/offline, organisation responsible for delivery, fees, estimated time of completion), administrative procedures, e-government-related laws and regulations SS: provide self-service services (e.g. tax calculator) SP: allow the possibility to start an administrative procedure online (e.g. downloading forms) CP: allow the possibility to complete an administrative procedure online to obtain a service (full transactional services) DM: allow user to provide input in government decision-making (e.g. feedback on service quality) Note: Systemic functions of portals such as providing digital signatures, individual document vaults, ID management, etc. are not covered in this typology

  9. Next steps • what? • - Complete and update existing databases • - more extensive data collection • focus? descriptionNOT EVALUATION of e-government frameworks • output? Overview study

  10. Where to focus? Main areas for data collection

  11. Question for discussion • What are the basic frameworks and mechanisms for e-government implementation, in addition to those presented today, for which you wish data to be collected? • How can the OECD assist in ensuring that common data collection frameworks on e-government be established and used for the benefit of individual Arab countries? • What are your needs in terms of collecting data and information for better policy-making in the area of e-government?

More Related