180 likes | 190 Views
Learn about the Optional Protocol to the ICESCR and how to strategically navigate the inter-state communications, inquiry, and communications procedures. Discover how to choose a compelling case, make persuasive arguments, request effective remedies, and incorporate litigation into a wider advocacy strategy.
E N D
The Optional Protocol to the ICESCR Susie Talbot, INTERIGHTS
Overview of session • The ICESCR and OP-ICESCR background • Opportunities under the OP-ICESCR • Taking a strategic case from the national level to the CESCR
The ICESCR • Overarching principles of the Covenant • Rights included: • Rights about working and the conditions of work • Rights about social security, protection and assistance • Rights about adequate living standards, health, education and cultural life
Background to the OP-ICESCR • No right without a remedy • Universal, interdependent and indivisible • Negotiation and drafting of OP • Entry into force on 5 May 2013
Opportunities under the OP • Inter-state communications procedure • Inquiry procedure • Communications procedure
Inter-State communications • Mechanism for inter-State complaints resolution • Requires opt-in by State parties • Procedure
Inquiry procedure • Mechanism for CESCR inquiry into grave and systematic violations • Requires opt-in by State parties • Procedure
Communications procedure • Mechanism for complaining that a State Party has violated one or more Covenant rights • Submitting a communication • Standing • Admissibility criteria • Costs • Friendly settlement
Interim measures • Victims of alleged violations can request to avoid irreparable damage • Not a decision on admissibility or the merits
Assessing a communication • Transmission • Examination • Documents/information to consider • ‘Reasonableness’ standard of review • Guidance – general comments, conclusions in State reporting, similar c/ees etc
Outcome • Views and recommendations • CESCR follow up • Implementation • International assistance and cooperation
Taking a strategic case from the national level to the CESCR • (1) choosing a case • (2) the ‘right’ claimant(s) and respondent(s) • (3) making a persuasive argument • (4) asking for effective remedies • (5) litigation within a wider advocacy strategy
(1) Choosing a case • Importance of issue • Sources of cases
(2) Who is involved? • Possible claimants • Standing • Individual circumstances • Safety and confidentiality • Engagement by affected communities • The respondent State
(3) Making an effective argument • Consider all key rights engaged by situation • Make a clear and persuasive argument • Using international and comparative law • Expert evidence • Asking others to intervene
(4) Remedies • Consider both individual and general • Be specific • Work with relevant stakeholders
(5) Wider advocacy strategy • Long-term legal strategy • Wider advocacy strategy
Conclusion and next steps • Key socio-economic issues in your country • National level international level • Increase the impact • Susie Talbot • stalbot@interights.org