1 / 24

England’s National Programme for Gifted and Talented Education Hong Kong Gifted Education Conference 6-7 March 2008

Tim Dracup, Assistant Director, Improving Pupil Performance Division, DCSF. England’s National Programme for Gifted and Talented Education Hong Kong Gifted Education Conference 6-7 March 2008. Agenda. England’s National Programme: Draft Credo Hong Kong and England: some comparisons

hinda
Download Presentation

England’s National Programme for Gifted and Talented Education Hong Kong Gifted Education Conference 6-7 March 2008

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Tim Dracup, Assistant Director, Improving Pupil Performance Division, DCSF England’s National Programme for Gifted and Talented EducationHong Kong Gifted Education Conference6-7 March 2008

  2. Agenda England’s National Programme: Draft Credo Hong Kong and England: some comparisons Key projects in England Scope for sharing and collaboration?

  3. Draft Credo: What Works? SCHOOL- DRIVEN UNIVERSAL OUTCOMES-FOCUSSED INTEGRATED PERSONALISED

  4. The central spine of the model rests on the foundation of personalised education. G&T education is one dimension of personalised education for all; it must also be personalised in itself, to meet the widely differing needs of the G&T population, which is far from homogenous. • The mid-section of the central spine – and the centrepiece of the model – is the conviction that, for G&T education to be successful, it must be integrated: firmly part of wider education policy and practice; but also integrated in itself, rather than a disparate collection of strategies and approaches; • The central spine is crowned by the belief that effective G&T education has to be universal within our education system, otherwise impact will be reduced and G&T learners will not experience entitlement or continuity; • The left-hand pillar supporting the tripartite central spine acknowledges our commitment to a school-centred and school-driven approach to G&T education; • The right-hand pillar recognises that the ultimate success of any G&T programme depends on it being relentlessly outcomes-focussed, resulting ultimately in higher levels of achievement for G&T learners.

  5. Personalised… Discover and develop a wide range of abilities Support disadvantaged to remove achievement gaps Meet G&T learners’ very different needs Holistic development – strengths and weaknesses Flexible curriculum Identification part of assessment for learning Learners directing their own learning

  6. Integrated… Mainstreamed across education policy (Children’s Plan; National Strategies)‏ A whole school issue Identification and provision overlap and are mutually reinforcing In school and out of school learning complementary Parents as co-educators Schools working in partnership with HE, business and wider community

  7. Universal… A global issue – collaboration vital Lifelong learning (4-19 at least!)‏ All schools have G&T learners; All learners may be G&T learners – representative populations G&T education takes place in every learning setting, every classroom Every educator is an educator of G&T learners There are common standards for whole school provision, teaching and learning – all can improve!

  8. School-driven… Schools are the core providers and typically co-ordinators of external support Schools can contribute distinctively through their missions, structures, specialisms Inter-school collaboration is beneficial Schools responsible for evaluating and improving their provision Centres of excellence can drive system-wide improvement

  9. Outcomes-focussed… Support must improve pupil achievement (maybe by improving aspirations, motivation, self-esteem)‏ Support should aim to eliminate achievement gaps between advantaged and disadvantaged learners The system should be engaged in continuous improvement G&T education is a testbed for innovation G&T education can drive personalisation for all G&T education can drive school improvement

  10. Hong Kong and England -Where can we learn from each other? Similarities Broad definition ‘Best fit’ identification Ability not achievement? School-centred Academy Online resources: web 2.0 Educating educators Collaboration between schools Differences Size and scale Three tiers – national, regional, local Three tiers – top 2% Creativity and leadership Classroom emphasis? Competitions School specialism Physical v virtual academy? Focus on disadvantage (excellence and equity)‏

  11. YG&T Learner Academy now For all learners identified as G&T, primary, secondary, post-16 Catalogue of (300+) learning opportunities classified by: Target age range Subject/focus Challenge Resource base for professionals (500+ items)‏ Discussion forums, news YG&T Learner Academy YG&T Educator Support

  12. YG&T Learner Academy in 2008 Registration of all identified G&T learners Regular communication with all regions (9), local authorities (150), leading teachers (7,000+), members (up to 733,000)‏ Social network functionality (blog, wiki, newsfeed, calendar, web TV) for learners and teachers Online peer support network for leading teachers Associate members in schools outside England (and independent sector and home-educated in England)‏

  13. City Challenges 30%+ of disadvantaged G&T learners Full network of school-university partnerships Teach First Advocates – raising aspirations and expectations; information, advice and guidance Years 10-13 £400 per year support in return for progress against personal targets Schools to improve support for all disadvantaged G&T learners Identification tools for disadvantaged underachievers Progression to the right courses at the right universities!

  14. Leading Teachers ‘Leading Professional’ for G&T education One per secondary school At least one per group of primary schools) Wide range of prior experience and expertise Blended learning training (21 e-modules)‏ Online peer support network Networks of expertise and 'leading leading teachers' Action research (linked to quality standards) for Masters

  15. Quality Standards Three standards: classroom, school, local authority Three levels: entry, developing exemplary Many uses: Build consensus on best practice Common pedagogical framework Self-evaluation and improvement planning Guidance and professional development (CPD)‏ Informing the market in CPD and support Developing centres of excellence Accountability

  16. Tracking National Census and National Register Identification – representative populations Achievement – underachieving groups Potentially tailored support

  17. Scope for sharing and collaboration Academy links and associate membership Inter-Academy online activities Language learning potential Professional discussion and development Open access to resources, training modules – international portals for learners and educators Federated parents’ organisations 'Critical friends' – bilateral peer review GATEKeepers – bilateral policy development International quality standards

  18. ANNEXES

  19. National programme objectives Improve learner outcomes – especially attainment but also aspirations, motivation, self-esteem – particularly for the most disadvantaged Improve the quality of identification, teaching and support in all schools and classrooms Improve the supply, quality and targeting of: Out of school learning and support for learners; and Support for parents, educators and schools at local, regional and national levels.

  20. Structure CfBT IPPD NS National Managing Contractor Policy G&T plan Regional Partnerships Excellence Hubs City Challenges Regional Rural Local Local Authorities, Trusts, Federations, Leading Edge High Performing Specialist Schools

  21. Managing the National Programme DCSF Strategic policy development Strategic communications International collaboration CfBT Learner Academy Educator Support Portal National Strategies G&T plan Leading Teachers Quality Standards

  22. Terminology and definition Gifted = Academic ability or potential in one or more subjects Talented = Ability or potential in one or more skills whether artistic, sporting, interpersonal, vocational Gifted and Talented = ‘Children and young people with one or more abilities developed to a level significantly ahead of their year group (or with the potential to develop those abilities).’

  23. A school’s G&T population All pupils aged 11-19 who meet the published eligibility criteria for the national top 5% All pupils identified by the school as G&T relative to their year group in their school No fixed percentage but every school should have some! G&T population should be broadly representative of whole school population by gender, ethnic and socio-economic background Pupils move in and out over time, but increasing stability in population as age rises

  24. Hyperlinks YG&T Portal Whole school quality standards Classroom quality standards Core identification guidance Primary Guidance Secondary Guidance

More Related