160 likes | 171 Views
Modeling augmentations. Maja Žumer University of Ljubljana. Examples of augmentations. Text with illustrations (or illustrations with text) Text with foreword, notes Music and words Music and choreography Not the best term, because it implies that one content part is more important.
E N D
Modeling augmentations Maja Žumer University of Ljubljana FRBR Workshop May 2, 2005
Examples of augmentations • Text with illustrations (or illustrations with text) • Text with foreword, notes • Music and words • Music and choreography Not the best term, because it implies that one content part is more important... FRBR Workshop May 2, 2005
Delsey (1998) • Document part: Examples: physically separate component of a multipart document, accompanying material, issue of a serial • Content part: “Individual component of the intellectual or artistic content of document or document part (article in a serial, chapter/section/part, illustration for a text, sound aspect of a film...)” FRBR Workshop May 2, 2005
Our augmentation • Content part • segmental (foreword and text) • systemic (words and music) • Dependent (choreography) • Independent (foreword) FRBR Workshop May 2, 2005
FRBR and parts Whole/part relationship • Work • Expression Complement, supplement (work-to-work, expression-to-expression of different works, expression-to-work) FRBR Workshop May 2, 2005
Categories of parts in FRBR • Dependent: Component parts of a work that are intended to be used in context of the larger work and depend on the context of the larger work for their meaning • segmental (prefaces, chapters, sections, parts) • systemic (illustrations) • Independent: They do not depend on the context provided by the the larger work for their meaning FRBR Workshop May 2, 2005
Examples in FRBR • Supplement (referential) • index, concordance, teacher’s guide • Complement (referential) • libretto, choreography • Whole/part • illustration for a text FRBR Workshop May 2, 2005
Page 70: “There will often be no reason for a dependent part of a work to be separately identified or described in a bibliographic record. In certain instances ... it may be considered useful to identify and describe the component in its own right.” • Added entry • Contents note FRBR Workshop May 2, 2005
Issues • Is there always the ‘main work’? • Should segmental and systemic parts be modeled differently? • Should dependent and independent parts be modeled differently? • Should the model take into account the context in which the “combination” occured? FRBR Workshop May 2, 2005
Most manifestations embody more than one expression (work) For example: • text • illustrations • editor’s contribution • layout design • cover design • ... FRBR Workshop May 2, 2005
Possibilities • Choose the ‘main work’ and treat as a new expression of this work • Treat as embodiment of several expressions FRBR Workshop May 2, 2005
work T I expression M T I manifestation M FRBR Workshop May 2, 2005
work T+I+M expression T manifestation FRBR Workshop May 2, 2005
work expression T I M manifestation FRBR Workshop May 2, 2005
work expression T I M manifestation FRBR Workshop May 2, 2005
Proposal • Embodiment of several expressions • Treat as composite work if necessary • Record all expressions (works) important for the intended user FRBR Workshop May 2, 2005