1 / 34

18.1 Classification

18.1 Classification. The need for systems. I. Taxonomy- the science of describing, naming and classifying organisms. a. this is necessary because there are millions of organisms we haven’t classified yet. b. so far 1.7 million have been named. What kind of bird is this?.

hiram-case
Download Presentation

18.1 Classification

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 18.1 Classification

  2. The need for systems. I. Taxonomy- the science of describing, naming and classifying organisms. a. this is necessary because there are millions of organisms we haven’t classified yet. b. so far 1.7 million have been named.

  3. What kind of bird is this?

  4. This is a robin to Europeans!

  5. The need for systems. • This is why common names are not used to classify. • Scientists classify organisms into different categories called taxa. (singular taxon).

  6. Scientific Naming • Carl Linnaeus popularized a system for naming all species in the 1750’s. • Binomial nomenclature=was his two part naming system. • Every species has a two part name: a. Homo sapien b. Felis domesticus

  7. Scientific Naming • Linnaeus once said that “binomial nomenclature is one of the greatest achievements in science.” • Carl Linne was his original name until he decided to “latinize” his name!

  8. Rules for scientific naming: • No two species can have the same name. • Always made up of two Latin or “Latin like” terms. • The first word is made up of the organism’s genus. • The second word is the “species identifier” (the completely unique part).

  9. Rules for scientific naming: 5. The first word should be capitalized. 6. The second word should be lowercase. 7. Both terms should be italicized. Make a scientific name for yourself:

  10. Equus caballus

  11. Acer rubrum

  12. Zea mays

  13. Canis familiarisaka: ALLIE STIPANOVICH

  14. The Linnaean System • Linnaeus grouped organisms according to their similarities in form and structure. • He categorized them into eight levels: Domain, Kingdom, Phylem, Class, Order, Family, Genus, Species.

  15. The Levels: • Domain- differentiates between cell type. (3 categories) • Kingdom-Large groups such as:plants, animals, fungi (6 categories). • Phylum-Exist within kingdoms. Humans in phylum chordata.

  16. The Levels 4. Class- subgroups of phylums. 5. Order- subgroups of classes. 6. Family- subgroup of orders. 7. Genus-subgroup of families. Very closely related species. 8. Species- A unique group of organisms united by their ability to breed. Also has unique characteristics.

  17. Lets review! • Why do biologist use the classification system? • What is the naming system called? • How many domains and kingdoms are there? • What kingdom do humans reside in?

  18. MODERN SYSTEMATICS 18.2 • I. Traditional Systematics • II. Phylogenetics • III. Cladistics • IV. Inferring Evolutionary Relatedness

  19. I. Traditional Systematics • Scientists traditionally have used similarities in appearance and structure to group organisms EXAMPLE: Ungulate Mammals

  20. BUT, this approach has proven problematic b/c some organisms LOOK similar but turn out to be DISTANTLY related EXAMPLE: birds were thought to be a completely separate group, unrelated to reptiles(this is a Norfolk Island green parrot)

  21. Norfolk Island- off the northeast coast of Australia Fossil evidence now shows that birds are descended from a subgroup of dinosaurs (reptiles) called theropods

  22. Systematics is the revision of classification and procedures. This is necessary as more (fossils) are discovered EXAMPLE of a FOSSIL: Conifer plant fossil found in Thompson Springs, Utah

  23. II. Phylogenetics • Grouping organisms by similarity is often assumed to reflect phylogeny, but inferring phylogeny is complex in practice. • PHYLOGENY=the ancestral relationships between species

  24. EXAMPLE: Modern phylogenetic tree that hypothesizes the relationships between several groups

  25. Misleading similarities-not all similar characteristics came from the same ancestor EXAMPLE: The wings of insects and the wings of birds did not evolve from the same CA (common ancestor) * Insects had wings long before birds*

  26. Judging relatedness- are some characteristics more important than others? • Different scientists have different answers! young lady or old lady??? 

  27. III. Cladistics • Cladistic analysis is an OBJECTIVE way to select the most likely phylogeny among a given set of organisms. • Cladistics is a method of analysis that infers phylogenies by careful comparisons of shared characters.

  28. Flowers: shared only by flowering plants • Comparing Characters: ancestral character/derived character Seeds: Shared by all living conifers • This is a “meat flower” found in Indonesia that has a scent of rotting meat… Why????

  29. Constructing Cladograms-All groups that arise from one point belong in a CLADE • Each CLADE is usually compared with an OUTGROUP CLADE OUTGROUP

  30. IV. Inferring Evolutionary Relatedness • Biologists compare many kinds of evidence and apply logic carefully in order to infer phylogenies. • Morphology refers to the physical structure or anatomy of organisms • We can compare morphology to determine relationships

  31. What other animal’s morphology can we compare to this horse’ morphology????

  32. Molecular evidence includes DNA, RNA, and proteins that can be compared to infer phylogenies • The principle of parsimony holds that the simplest explanation for something is the most reasonable

  33. Given 2 possible cladograms, the one with the fewest changes is preferred

More Related