1 / 26

Future of Competition and Collaboration in HEPI Conference

Explore changing patterns of competition, drivers of collaboration, and the geography of collaboration in higher education. Delve into case examples and global trends. Understand how collaboration drives success and learn about key collaborations at the University of Nottingham.

hmacias
Download Presentation

Future of Competition and Collaboration in HEPI Conference

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. HEPI Conference, December 2nd 2010 Competition V Collaboration : What Does the Future Hold? Professor David Greenaway University of Nottingham

  2. Coverage • Changing Patterns of Competition • Drivers of Collaboration • Geography of Collaboration • The Future for Collaboration • A Case Study : Collaboration and Nottingham

  3. Changing Patterns of Competition

  4. Changing Patterns of Competition • Who competes? • Individual researchers • Disciplinary clusters • Higher education institutions • Nations

  5. What Are We Competing Over? • Funding (Research Councils, RAE / REF, EU……) • Research resources (PhD students, key labs…..) • Impact (citations, innovation, transformation….) • Prestige (RAE, League Tables, Prizes……) • Success (we just like winning!)

  6. How is the Competitive Landscape Changing? • Increased pressures on available resources • Changing expectations of funding agenciesTo be competitive, need overlapping geographies • Higher education becoming more globalised • Geography of global competition changing • Old competitors opening up (eg US) • New competitors emerging (eg China and India)

  7. Collaboration

  8. Drivers of Collaboration • Individual • Gains from trade (pooling, access, citations…) • Funding agency priorities (multidisciplinary research focus, geography….) • Disciplinary • Critical mass / survival (scale, depth….) • Delivery (access to essential inputs, adding value) • Institutional • Market access (diversification, penetration…..) • Visibility (brand development, league tables….) • National • Spillovers (learning by collaborating, innovation and growth) • Prestige (league tables)

  9. Geography of Collaboration • Local • Regional • National • International • Diffusion of knowledge does not respect boundaries

  10. Collaboration Will Increase • ‘Grand Challenges’ are global (food security, energy technologies, public health…….) • Growing linkage of research and innovation • Strategic partnerships with Research Councils • Falling trade costs • Globalisation of higher education • Increased business to business engagement • Globalisation of business to business engagement • Income diversification

  11. Trade Costs 1980-2005 Index, 1985-100

  12. HE Students Studying Overseas

  13. Imports and Exports of International Students

  14. Global Trends in Research Collaboration

  15. More Collaboration Will HelpDrive Success • Individual (citations, impact, funding) • Disciplinary (competitiveness, critical mass, spillovers) • Institutional (competitiveness, leverage, survival) • National (knowledge based economy, inovation, competitiveness)

  16. A Case StudyCollaboration and the University of Nottingham

  17. Collaboration at Nottingham • Well embedded in institutional DNA • Collaborations at all levels (individual, disciplinary, institutional) • Partnerships with: other Universities; Research Councils; SMEs; global businesses; public sector bodies • ‘Death of distance’ means collaborations are local and global

  18. Local Collaborations • Education • Biocity • Nottingham University Samworth Academy • Business • Boots • Network of SMEs • Public Services • Nottingham University Hospitals Trust

  19. Regional / NationalCollaborations • Higher Education • Midlands Physics Alliance (+ Birmingham and Warwick) • Midlands Energy Consortium and MEGS (+ Birmingham and Loughborough) • Manufacturing Technology Centre (+ Birmingham and Loughborough) • Research Councils • BBSRC (Strategic Partnership) • EPSRC (Framework Agreement)

  20. Regional / NationalCollaborations • Business • Rolls Royce (UTCs + MTC) • Eon (MEC) • BGS (National Centre for Carbon Capture and Storage) • GSK (Carbon Neutral Laboratories)

  21. International Collaborations • innumerable individual, School and University collaborations • Universitas 21 network • International Campuses • University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus • University of Nottingham Ningbo China

  22. Nottingham Malaysia

  23. University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus • Research and Knowledge Transfer Opportunities • Addressing national / regional priorities (engineering, pharmaceutical sciences) • Leveraging global priorities (Crops for the Future) • Diversification of research funding (EU, MOSTI) • Building new collaborations (University, business, public sector)

  24. Nottingham China

  25. University of Nottingham Ningbo China • Research and Knowledge Transfer Opportunities: • Addressing local / national priorities (manufacturing, business and finance) • Leveraging for global priorities (sustainable energy technologies) • Diversification of research funding (MOST, Sustainable Manufacturing Key Labs) • Building new collaborations (University, business, public sector)

  26. Conclusions • Competition and collaboration are not mutually exclusive • Collaboration has the potential to add real value • With increased links between research and innovation and increased globalisation, potential for collaboration grows • Enormous potential globally

More Related