1 / 41

Study of excited baryons at BESII

Study of excited baryons at BESII. HongXun Yang Representing BES Collaboration IHEP yanghx@mail.ihep.ac.cn January 25-26, 2007,. Outline. Introduction FDC system for PWA N* in the decay of X(2075) and Nx in the decay of Summary.

hollee-mcgowan
Download Presentation

Study of excited baryons at BESII

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Study of excited baryonsat BESII HongXun Yang Representing BES Collaboration IHEP yanghx@mail.ihep.ac.cn January 25-26, 2007,

  2. Outline • Introduction • FDC system for PWA • N* in the decay of • X(2075)and Nx in the decay of • Summary

  3. The Beijing Electron Positron Collider L ~ ~51030 /cm2s at J/ peak Ecm~2-5 GeV

  4. BESII Detector VC: xy = 100 m TOF: T = 180 ps  counter: r= 3 cm MDC: xy = 220 m BSC: E/E= 22 % z = 5.5 cm dE/dx= 8.5 %  = 7.9 mr B field: 0.4 T p/p=1.78%(1+p2) z = 3.1 cm

  5. Study of Excited Baryon States Motivation • Probe the internal structure of light quark baryons • Search for “missing” baryons predicted by quarkmodel • Obtain a better understanding of the stronginteraction force in the non-perturbative regime • Examples for FDC application

  6. J/ decays • relatively large branching ratios (PDG2004)

  7. Pure isospin 1/2 Feynman diagram of the production of For and , N and N systems are limited to be pure isospin 1/2.

  8. FDC system

  9. Physics model • Feynman rules • Counterms • physical parameters

  10. Physical process • Generate Feynman Diagram • Manipulate Amplitude and generate fortran source • Manipulate Kinematics and generate fortran source • Compile files and link sources

  11. Application of FDC • Loglikelyhood • MC integration • Minimize lnLto get the parameters of each partial wave

  12. from BES II data • Events selection • 2 good charged tracks • Q1+Q2 = 0 • |cos| < 0.8 • PID: TOF and dE/dx • Mp > 1.15 GeV • 0.88<Mmiss<1.0 GeV • Background < 8%

  13. N* in N*(1520) N*(1535) N*(1650) N*(1675) N*(1680) N*(1440) ? L=0 limits it to be 3/2+ or 1/2+

  14. N* in Dalitz Plot: Acceptance and other reasons make the plot asymmetry.

  15. PWA with FDC • Try to determine the JPC of the resonance around 2.0 GeV/c2 • Following resonances are consideredN(939), P11(1440), D13(1520), S11(1535),S11(1650), D15(1675), F15(1680), X • For the background: phase space and sideband

  16. Results of PWA (I) data fit

  17. Results of PWA (II)

  18. Results of PWA (III) • L = 0 is preferred due to the suppression of the centrifugal barrier factor for L  1 • For L = 0, JP is limited to be ½+ and 3/2+ • S decrease more than 400 if either ½+ or 3/2+ is included in the PWA fit • S decrease more than 60 if one of them are added while another has been included

  19. conclusion • The peak around 2.0 GeV/c2 cannot be reproduced by reflections of well-established N* resonances • Jp=1/2+,3/2+ is preferred by PWA

  20. Events selection • 4 good charged tracks • PID: kaon and at least 1 proton ID • 2 (4C)<20 • Bg rate:1~2%

  21. N*(1535)? N*(1650)? *(1520) *(1690) N* & * in (I) • Two clear peaks at 1520, 1690 MeV/c2 in pK mass • N* in K mass

  22. X(2075)in N*(1535)? N*(1650)? X(2075) *(1690) *(1520) Phase Space • Bands for excited baryon statesin Dalitz plot

  23. Possible N* and Λ* in PWA • mass(JP) N*: 1535 (1/2-), 1650(1/2-), 1710(1/2+), 1720(3/2+), 1900(3/2+ or 3/2-), 2050(1/2+ or 3/2+) Λ*: 1405(1/2-), 1520(3/2-), 1600(1/2+), 1670(1/2-), 1690(3/2-), 1800(1/2-), 1810(1/2+), 1890(3/2+)

  24. Mathematical fit • W/o any constrains, PWA withN* and Λ* can fit data: (S= -997) • However, it needs many unexpected big BRs and many large destructive interferences to cancel these big BRs.

  25. Big BRs Fraction of NdataNevent N*(1900) 3/2+ 108% 5900 N*(2050) 3/2+ 33% 1800 Λ*(1890) 3/2+ 21% 1100 Λ*(1810) 1/2+ 9% 500 Λ*(1800) 1/2- 34% 1900 (1/2- is P-wave decay, which should be suppressed )

  26. Estimated Nevent in Ndata Nevent/2 (each decay mode, not include c.c.) N*(1900) 3/2+ ~ 300 -400 N*(2050) 3/2+ ~ 100 -150 Λ*(1890) 3/2+ ~ 100 -150 Λ*(1810) 1/2+ ~ 150 -200 Λ*(1800) 1/2- ~ 20 - 30 (1/2- is P-wave decay, which should be strongly suppressed near threshold)

  27. PWA with tight constrains and w/o X(2075) • Constrain the Neventof near threshold states ~ 100-200 • The PWA fit cannot reproduce the enhancement near pΛ threshold (S=-900).

  28. PWA with tight constrains and with X(2075) • Adding X(2075), PWA fit can reproduce the enhancement near pΛ threshold. • Significance of X(2075) >> 5 sigma. (S=-952)

  29. PWA with looser constrains and w/o X(2075) • Constrain the Neventof near threshold states ~ 500-600 (already too big at least for Λ*(1810), Λ*(1890) as limited in ) • The PWA fit can hardly reproduce the enhancement near pΛ threshold (S=-940).

  30. PWA with looser constrains and with X(2075) • Adding X(2075), PWA fit can reproduce the enhancement near pΛ threshold. • Significance of X(2075) > 5 sigma. (S=-962)

  31. conclusion of pΛenhancement • Reproducing the pΛ threshold enhancement with pure N* and Λ* interferences needs many unexpected big BRs and large destructive interferences. • PWA fits with pure N* and Λ* and with constrains can hardly reproduce the enhancement. • PWA fit with X(2075) can easily reproduce the enhancement (independent of constrains) with high significance.

  32. A strong enhancement near the threshold of mass spectrum of NX* BES II PS, eff. corrected (Arbitrary normalization)

  33. We perform PWA studies on the KΛ mass threshold structure:The most important we want to study is its production BR

  34. PWA is performed to • possible N* and *states listed in PDG are fitted • N(1720), N(1900), (1520), (1690), … • manydifferent combinations are tried • different JP of Nx is tried • also tried N(1535) to fit Nx

  35. Mass and Width scan Total fit (S=-952) Nevent: Fraction Nevent NX 14.7% 799 N(1720)17.1% 929 N(1900)13.2%717 (1520)4.8%261 (1570)21.8% 1184 (1690)14.4% 782 (1890) 13.8%750 X(2075) 11.3%614 An example of PWA fit Mass scan(GeV/c2) • NXN(1535) • Total fit (S=-932) • Nevent: • Fraction Nevent • N(1535) 26.0% 1413 • N(1720)9.7% 527 • N(1900)11.4%619 • (1520)4.8%261 • (1570)22.2% 1026 • (1690)3.6% 739 • (1890) 18.3%994 • X(2075) 11.2%608 Width scan(GeV/c2)

  36. Events/10MeV Crosses: data Hist.: PWA fit projection Dalitz plot (PWA) Dalitz plot (data)

  37. JP check with various combinations  • JP½- ½+ 3/2- 3/2+ non • A -940 -848 -848 -930 -813 • B -845 -783 -806 -833 -752 • C -952 -841 -844 -916 -768 • D -880 -768 -752 -822 -650 • E -957 -889 -893 -944 -875 • F -970 -920 -925 -963 -919 • G -954 -925 -919 -944 -909

  38. Fit results

  39. A strong enhancement is observed near the mass threshold of MKat BES II. • Preliminary PWA with various combinations of possible N* and Λ* in the fits —— The structure Nx*has: Mass 1500~1650MeV Width70~110MeV JP favors 1/2-  consistent with N*(1535) The most important is: It has large BR(J/ψ  pNX*) BR(NX* KΛ)2 X 10-4 , suggesting NX*has strong coupling to KΛ. indicating it could be a KΛ molecular state (5 - quark system).

  40. Summary • FDC applied in the analysis of and • Clear signals of excited baryons observed • Seemed to be “missing” states observed in • Possible multi-quark states X(2075) and Nx in • PWA on Nx, N* and * in is still going on…

  41. Thank you!

More Related