Download
1 / 12
120 likes | 134 Views
A man in his mid-20s is faced with the dilemma of choosing a life partner. He desires someone his parents approve of, who is smart, beautiful, gentle, good at cooking, and independent. However, he also wants someone who won't restrict his lifestyle choices, such as playing games, smoking, and drinking. Two potential partners, Girl A and Girl B, have different qualities and interests. This Group Project explores the use of collaborative tools to identify interests, values, and risks associated with different decisions. The Autonomy method and tools like EthXpert and Collab prove helpful in decision-making, with Collab being the preferred choice for its web deployment and collaborative capabilities. Potential improvements include restructuring the Autonomy tool and adding an export function to both EthXpert and Collab.
E N D
Group ProjectThe dilemma Group 3 – Benny, Tao, Ruth
MAN, 25, wants to marry someone he know. He loves computer games, he smokes and drinks, enjoy hanging out with friends. His parents own a big company and • The man would like to marry a girl smart, beautiful and gentle, good at cooking, independent, someone his parents approve of. He don't want his wife play games, smoke and drink, but he don't want his wife stop him when he want to or when he wants to hang out with his friends. The facts
GIRL A, less smart, very beautiful, aggressive, unruly, loving computer games, likes smoking and drinking, good at cooking, full time employed earning a respectable salary in a clerical position. • GIRL B, smart, less beautiful but not ugly, good temper, gentle, no idea about games, hating smoking and drinking, very sociable, not good at cooking, not employed but waiting for a job opportunity that interest her. The options
Both Girl A and Girl B would like to marry the man. Prerequisite
http://interact.it.uu.se/collab/index.php?action=Open+project&projectID=67&userID=76http://interact.it.uu.se/collab/index.php?action=Open+project&projectID=67&userID=76 Collab link
The Tools are useful for us to identifying interests/values as well as identifying risks with different decisions. • It would seem like the order of business is the following: First you start with the OLE, depending a bit on the type of problem you have, it seems to be formulated for projects and IT use so we could not use it for our problem. Next one uses the HA, to identify Heteronomy and Autonomy sides, to find interests and principles. These one can later input into the AT, EthXpert or ColLab. Even though the AT is simple in its layout it will soon turn very messy as one tries to have many interests. From our point of view it seems almost simpler to attack the ColLab instantly. • Both ColLab and EthXpert seems to simplify the Autonomy method, but the better one is ColLab since then it is web deployed and there is a possibility of collaborating with others on these projects, they worked well according to us. The autonomy method is very helpful in decision making and ColLab highlights and simplifies it so that one can perform it with ease. • Some notes on possible improvements: First regarding the AT if you do it on a computer it would most likely to be better if one replaces the columns and rows, since for the most part there are more interests than there are possible options. Secondly there could be an export function to Excel in both EthXpert and ColLab. Evaluation
