1 / 67

COM 633: Content Analysis Result & Reporting

COM 633: Content Analysis Result & Reporting. Kimberly A. Neuendorf, Ph.D. Cleveland State University Fall 2010. Hypotheses and Research Questions. The difference? Let’s discuss. Selecting Appropriate Statistics. Presenting Results: Tables and Figures. Frequencies. Co-Occurrences.

holt
Download Presentation

COM 633: Content Analysis Result & Reporting

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. COM 633: Content AnalysisResult & Reporting Kimberly A. Neuendorf, Ph.D. Cleveland State University Fall 2010

  2. Hypotheses and Research Questions • The difference? Let’s discuss.

  3. Selecting Appropriate Statistics

  4. Presenting Results:Tables and Figures

  5. Frequencies

  6. Co-Occurrences

  7. Time Lines Bivariate, typically. . . with time as the IV

  8. Source: Finkel, S. E., & Geer, J. G. (1998). A spot check: Casting doubt on the demobilizing effect of attack advertising. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 573-595.

  9. Source: McQuarrie, E. F., & Phillips, B. J. (2008). It’s not your father’s magazine ad: Magnitude and direction of recent changes in advertising style. Journal of Advertising, 37(3), 95-106.

  10. Source: McQuarrie, E. F., & Phillips, B. J. (2008). It’s not your father’s magazine ad: Magnitude and direction of recent changes in advertising style. Journal of Advertising, 37(3), 95-106.

  11. Source: Simonton, D. K. (1980). Thematic fame and melodic originality in classical music: A multivariate computer-content analysis. Journal of Personality, 48(2), 206-219.

  12. Bivariate Relationships • A single IV and a single DV shown in one table

  13. Source: Cressman, D. L., Callister, M., Robinson, T., & Near, C. (2009). Swearing in the cinema: An analysis of profanity in US teen-oriented movies, 1980-2006.

  14. IV = ??? DV = ??? Hypothesis = ??? Statistic(s) = ??? Source: Cressman, D. L., Callister, M., Robinson, T., & Near, C. (2009). Swearing in the cinema: An analysis of profanity in US teen-oriented movies, 1980-2006.

  15. Source: Cressman, D. L., Callister, M., Robinson, T., & Near, C. (2009). Swearing in the cinema: An analysis of profanity in US teen-oriented movies, 1980-2006.

  16. IV = ??? DV = ??? Hypothesis = ??? Statistic(s) = ??? Source: Cressman, D. L., Callister, M., Robinson, T., & Near, C. (2009). Swearing in the cinema: An analysis of profanity in US teen-oriented movies, 1980-2006.

  17. Source: Cressman, D. L., Callister, M., Robinson, T., & Near, C. (2009). Swearing in the cinema: An analysis of profanity in US teen-oriented movies, 1980-2006.

  18. IV = ??? DV = ??? Hypothesis = ??? Statistic(s) = ??? Source: Cressman, D. L., Callister, M., Robinson, T., & Near, C. (2009). Swearing in the cinema: An analysis of profanity in US teen-oriented movies, 1980-2006.

  19. Source: Pan, P.-L., Meng, J., & Zhou, S. (2010). Morality or equality? Ideological framing in news coverage of gay marriage legitimization. The Social Science Journal, 47, 630-645.

  20. IV = ??? DV = ??? Hypothesis = ??? Statistic(s) = ??? Source: Pan, P.-L., Meng, J., & Zhou, S. (2010). Morality or equality? Ideological framing in news coverage of gay marriage legitimization. The Social Science Journal, 47, 630-645.

  21. Source: Pan, P.-L., Meng, J., & Zhou, S. (2010). Morality or equality? Ideological framing in news coverage of gay marriage legitimization. The Social Science Journal, 47, 630-645.

  22. IV = ??? DV = ??? Hypothesis = ??? Statistic(s) = ??? Source: Pan, P.-L., Meng, J., & Zhou, S. (2010). Morality or equality? Ideological framing in news coverage of gay marriage legitimization. The Social Science Journal, 47, 630-645.

  23. Source: Pan, P.-L., Meng, J., & Zhou, S. (2010). Morality or equality? Ideological framing in news coverage of gay marriage legitimization. The Social Science Journal, 47, 630-645.

  24. IV = ??? DV = ??? Hypothesis = ??? Statistic(s) = ??? Source: Pan, P.-L., Meng, J., & Zhou, S. (2010). Morality or equality? Ideological framing in news coverage of gay marriage legitimization. The Social Science Journal, 47, 630-645.

  25. Source: Pan, P.-L., Meng, J., & Zhou, S. (2010). Morality or equality? Ideological framing in news coverage of gay marriage legitimization. The Social Science Journal, 47, 630-645.

  26. IV = ??? DVs = ??? Hypotheses = ??? Statistic(s) = ??? Source: Pan, P.-L., Meng, J., & Zhou, S. (2010). Morality or equality? Ideological framing in news coverage of gay marriage legitimization. The Social Science Journal, 47, 630-645.

  27. Source: Taylor, C. R., & Taylor, J. C. (1994). Regulatory issues in outdoor advertising: A content analysis of billboards. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 13(1), 97-107.

  28. IV = ??? DV = ??? Hypothesis = ??? Statistic(s) = ??? Source: Taylor, C. R., & Taylor, J. C. (1994). Regulatory issues in outdoor advertising: A content analysis of billboards. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 13(1), 97-107.

  29. Bivariate Relationships • Multiple DVs shown in same table

  30. Source: Pan, P.-L., Meng, J., & Zhou, S. (2010). Morality or equality? Ideological framing in news coverage of gay marriage legitimization. The Social Science Journal, 47, 630-645.

  31. IV = ??? DVs = ??? Hypotheses = ??? Statistic(s) = ??? Source: Pan, P.-L., Meng, J., & Zhou, S. (2010). Morality or equality? Ideological framing in news coverage of gay marriage legitimization. The Social Science Journal, 47, 630-645.

  32. Source: Pan, P.-L., Meng, J., & Zhou, S. (2010). Morality or equality? Ideological framing in news coverage of gay marriage legitimization. The Social Science Journal, 47, 630-645.

  33. IV = ??? DVs = ??? Hypotheses = ??? Statistic(s) = ??? Source: Pan, P.-L., Meng, J., & Zhou, S. (2010). Morality or equality? Ideological framing in news coverage of gay marriage legitimization. The Social Science Journal, 47, 630-645.

  34. Source: Pettijohn, R. F. II, & Tesser, A. (1999). Popularity in environmental context: Facial feature assessment of American movie actresses. Media Psychology, 1, 229-247.

  35. IV = ??? DVs = ??? Hypotheses = ??? Statistic(s) = ??? Source: Pettijohn, R. F. II, & Tesser, A. (1999). Popularity in environmental context: Facial feature assessment of American movie actresses. Media Psychology, 1, 229-247.

  36. Bivariate Relationships • Multiple IVs shown in same table

  37. Source: Pan, P.-L., Meng, J., & Zhou, S. (2010). Morality or equality? Ideological framing in news coverage of gay marriage legitimization. The Social Science Journal, 47, 630-645.

  38. IV = ??? DVs = ??? Hypotheses = ??? Statistic(s) = ??? Source: Pan, P.-L., Meng, J., & Zhou, S. (2010). Morality or equality? Ideological framing in news coverage of gay marriage legitimization. The Social Science Journal, 47, 630-645.

  39. Source: Smith, S. S. (2008). From violent words to violent deeds: Assessing risk from FBI threatening communication cases. In J. R. Meloy, L. Sheridan, & J. Hoffmann (Eds.), Stalking, threatening, and attacking public figures: A psychological and behavioral analysis (pp. 435-566). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  40. IVs = ??? DV = ??? Hypotheses = ??? Statistic(s) = ??? Source: Smith, S. S. (2008). From violent words to violent deeds: Assessing risk from FBI threatening communication cases. In J. R. Meloy, L. Sheridan, & J. Hoffmann (Eds.), Stalking, threatening, and attacking public figures: A psychological and behavioral analysis (pp. 435-566). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  41. Source: Smith, S. S. (2008). From violent words to violent deeds: Assessing risk from FBI threatening communication cases. In J. R. Meloy, L. Sheridan, & J. Hoffmann (Eds.), Stalking, threatening, and attacking public figures: A psychological and behavioral analysis (pp. 435-566). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  42. IVs = ??? DV = ??? Hypotheses = ??? Statistic(s) = ??? Source: Smith, S. S. (2008). From violent words to violent deeds: Assessing risk from FBI threatening communication cases. In J. R. Meloy, L. Sheridan, & J. Hoffmann (Eds.), Stalking, threatening, and attacking public figures: A psychological and behavioral analysis (pp. 435-566). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  43. Multivariate Relationships

More Related