1 / 32

WG11 Snapshot July ‘11

This document provides an update on the status of the IEEE 802.11 Task & Study Group Officers as of July 2011, including officer nominations and membership status.

howardm
Download Presentation

WG11 Snapshot July ‘11

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Name Company Address Phone email bkraemer@ marvell .com Bruce Kraemer Marvell 5488 Marvell Ln +1 - 321 - 4 27 - Santa Clara, CA 4098 95054 WG11 Snapshot July ‘11 Authors: Date: 12 -July-2011 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell)

  2. PAR Expiration/Renewal Schedule https://development.standards.ieee.org/pub/active-pars?n=22&o=1a0a2a3d Bruce Kraemer (Marvell)

  3. Officers Bruce Kraemer (Marvell)

  4. WG11 Task & Study Group Officers – July 2011 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell) NYRQ = Not yet required, nominations are not open OPEN = Candidate Nominations are open

  5. WG11 Task & Study Group Officers – July 2011 adj Bruce Kraemer (Marvell) NYRQ = Not yet required, nominations are not open OPEN = Candidate Nominations are open

  6. Status Reports Bruce Kraemer (Marvell)

  7. Current Membership Status • Definitions: • Aspirant: a member who has attended 1 qualifying meeting • Potential Voter: a member who has attended 2 qualifying meetings and will become a voter at the start of the next plenary they attend Data as of 2011-01-14 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell)

  8. IEEE 802.11 Standards Pipeline May 2011 802.11z TDLS 802.11 -2007 802.11s Mesh e QoS 802.11r Fast Roam MAC 802.11u WIEN h DFS & TPC 802.11k RRM i Security 802.11aa Video Transport 802.11V Network Management 802.11ai FILS 802.11Y Contention Based Protocol f Inter AP 802.11ae QoS Mgmt Frm Smart Grid j JP bands 802.11p WAVE 802.11mb Revision WNG g 54 Mbps 2.4GHz 802.11 ah 802.11n High Throughput (>100 Mbps) 802.11af TVWS 802.11 -2003 b 11Mbps 2.4 GHz 802.11ac VHT 5GHz 802.11W Management Frame Security a 54 Mbps 5GHz d 802.11ad VHT 60GHz PHY 802.11 (’99) 2.4GHz Published Amendment Discussion Topics Study groups WG Letter Ballot Sponsor Ballot TG without draft Published Standard Slide 8 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell)

  9. 802.11mb Revision IEEE 802.11 Revisions May 2011 802.11ai FILS 802.11z TDLS 802.11s Mesh MAC 802.11 -2003 e QoS 802.11 -2007 802.11 -2012 802.11 -1999 802.11e QoS Mgt Frames 802.11r Fast Roam 802.11u WIEN h DFS & TPC 802.11aa Video Transport 802.11k RRM i Security 802.11V Network Management 802.11aa Video Transport 802.11Y Contention Based Protocol f Inter AP j JP bands d Intl roaming 802.11aaf TV Whitespace 802.11p WAVE 802.11ac Very High Throughput 6Gbps @ 5GHz a 54 Mbps 5GHz 802.11n High Throughput (>100 Mbps) b 11 Mbps 2.4GHz g 54 Mbps 2.4GHz 802.11ad Very High Throughput 6Gbps @ 60GHz 802.11W Management Frame Security 802.11ah <1GHz PHY Slide 9

  10. WG11 Editor Abstract / Agenda – July 2011 Roll Call / Contacts / Reflector Go round table and get brief status report ANA Status / Process / What is administered 802.11 Mandatory Editorial Coordination before SB Numbering Alignment process / Spreadsheet Amendment Ordering / Draft Snapshots Style Guide for 802.11 MIB style and Frame practices (FrameMaker 10.0) Slide 10 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell)

  11. WNG SC – July 2011 Review of objectives Advanced Clear Channel Assessment (CCA) &/or Specific Transmit Power Control (TPC) () – Lawrence Zuckerman Channel Contention with a Large Number of Contending STA's () – Ed Reuss

  12. IEEE 802.11 ARC SC – July 2011 • 802.11 ARC SC meets “as needed” • Dave Bagby not here – Mark Hamilton will lead • Ongoing Topic is Architecture revision • 802.1 architecture document revision effort • Brief update given in May Plenary • Concerted effort to complete comment resolutions and got to ballot in July • Two 802 group sessions + One 802.11 ARC session slot in July Slide 12 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell)

  13. TGmb - July 2011 Recirculation Sponsor Ballot on Draft 9.0 closed 22 June Pool 186, 139 affirmative – 93%, 11 Disapprove – 7%, 10 Abstain – 6% 208 comments This meeting Comment resolution Revisit timelines Expect recirculation ballot on D10.0 to begin in mid August, after 11s roll-in Agenda in 11-11-0906 Slide 13 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell)

  14. IEEE 802.11s Mesh Networking - July TGs Draft 12.0 passed the 5th Recirculation Sponsor Ballot (closing May) with 97.2 % % approval and 1 comment indicating that the draft meets all editorial requirements After the letter ballot, two of the Disapprove voters indicated that they would like to change their vote to Approve, bringing the approval rate up to 98.6%. The remaining two Disapprove voters each indicated dissatisfaction with the resolution of one of their comments In this meeting we will prepare the report for unconditional approval for the EC and the press release Slide 14 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell)

  15. IEEE 802.11aa – July - San Francisco, CA • Goals: • Resolve 4th recirculation (LB179) comments and approve corresponding resolutions • Resolve comments from IEEE-SA MEC and approve corresponding comment resolutions • Start recirculation letter ballot on Draft 6.0 • Joint Meeting with 802.1AVB • Submit deliverables for “conditional approval to go to sponsor ballot” to the EC and get EC Approval Opening report in document 11/0852r0 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell)

  16. IEEE 802.11ac – July 2011 Narrowly failed WG Letter Ballot 74%-26%. About 1500 comments are received, evenly divided between technical and editorial comments. Focus is on resolving LB 178 comments. Technical Submissions. Agenda in document 11-11/0922r0. Bruce Kraemer (Marvell)

  17. TGad – July Meeting Goals • Finish comment resolution on D3.0 • Approve D4.0

  18. TGae July 2011 Summary • Complete LB 180 Comment Resolution and approve recirculation LB • Received 77 comments (52 technical, 25 Editorial) • Request Conditional Sponsor Ballot Approval • Prepare SB Approval package and forward to EC • Revise plan of record. John Doe, Some Company

  19. TGaf – Meeting Goals July 2011 Approve meeting and teleconference minutes Review the results of LB171 Approve the LB171 comment spreadsheet in 11-11/277r12 Approve speculative draft D1.02 Review the progress since May Discuss the challenges and opportunities related to incorporating the TGac PHY Comment resolution Plan for September meeting, ad hoc and teleconferences Slide 19

  20. IEEE 802.11ah Snapshot - July • Primary focus • Make progress on channel model document • Continue work on, • Requirements document • Specification framework document • Timeline review & Teleconference schedule David Halasz, OakTree Wireless

  21. IEEE 802.11ai (FILS) – San Francisco , July 2011 • Goals for the Meeting: • Review and Approve the Palm Springs and Teleconference meeting minutes • Presentation of submissions • Discussion and approve Evaluation methodology • Submission of Initial technical contribution • General submission • TIME line of task group • Plan for Sep & Teleconference Bruce Kraemer (Marvell)

  22. IEEE JTC1 ad hoc – July 2011 • The agenda items that will be addressed this week are: • Review results of SC6 meeting in San Diego in June 2011 • Review status of SC6/WG1 projects of interest to 802 • Progress of WAPI NP • Progress of 802.1X/AE and 802.16 security replacement projects • Progress of 802.11ac replacement projects • Discuss 802 position on submission of 802 standards to ISO/IEC • Should existing 8802 standards be obsoleted? (position req. by Feb 12) • Should 802 WGs’s submit standards to ISO/IEC in future? • Should 802.11 submit 802.11-2007? • Should we summit to ISO/IEC using the PSDO agreement? • Prepare for teleconference in August on WAPI NP proposal • More general 802 topics will be addressed Wed AM1 Bruce Kraemer (Marvell)

  23. Regulatory Ad Hoc Committee Meeting Goals July 2011 • The regulatory summaries • Regulatory issues status • FCC open issues • EN 300 328 revision update; ERM vote • FCC 5 GHz rules changes update • Critical issues actions

  24. Smart Grid – July 2011 Tuesday pm1 & Thursday am1 • Revision NIST Smart Grid PAP#2 Report plan. • Australian Smart Metering RFI • UK Consultation • Update of activities in P2030 • Open SG • ITU Focus Group • ITU-R paper • IEEE Vision Bruce Kraemer (Marvell)

  25. Recent Ballots Bruce Kraemer (Marvell)

  26. Recent Ballot History Bruce Kraemer (Marvell)

  27. P802.11ad – D3.0 - WG LB 177 802.11 Ballot #177 was the second 15 day Working Group technical recirculation Ballot asking the question "Should P802.11ad D3.0 be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot?". Ballot Opening Date:    Tuesday May 17, 2011 - 23:59 ETBallot Closing Date:   Wednesday June 01, 2011 - 23:59 ET 278 eligible people are in this ballot group. 188 affirmative votes    16 negative votes     24 abstention votes ===   228 votes received = 82.0% valid returns                                  =  10.5% valid abstentions APPROVAL RATE:188  affirmative votes       =   92.2 % affirmative  16  total negative votes  =     7.8 % negative Motion passes. There were 211 comments received. Bruce Kraemer (Marvell)

  28. P802.11ac – D1.0 - WG LB 178 802.11 Ballot #178 was a 30 day Working Group technical recirculation Ballot asking the question "Should P802.11ac D1.0 be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot?". Ballot Opening Date:    Thursday May 26, 2011 - 23:59 ETBallot Closing Date:   Saturday June 25, 2011 - 23:59 ET 315 eligible people are in this ballot group. 148 affirmative votes    52 negative votes     16 abstention votes ===   216 votes received = 68.6% valid returns                                  =   7.4% valid abstentions APPROVAL RATE:148  affirmative votes       =   74.0 % affirmative  52  total negative votes  =     26.0 % negative Motion fails. There were 1795 comments received. Bruce Kraemer (Marvell)

  29. P802.11aa – D5.0 - WG LB 179 IEEE 802.11 WG Letter Ballot #179 was a 15 day recirculation Working Group Technical Ballot asking the question "Should P802.11aa D5.0 be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot?" The Official results follow: Ballot Opening Date:    Thursday June 02, 2011 - 23:59 ETBallot Closing Date:   Friday June 17, 2011 - 23:59 ET 257eligible people are in this ballot group.142 affirmative votes   15 negative votes     39 abstention votes ===  196  votes received  =  76.3% valid returns                                  =  19.9% valid abstentions APPROVAL RATE:142  affirmative votes       =   90.4 % affirmative  15  total negative votes  =     9.6 % negative Motion passes. There were 132 comments received. Bruce Kraemer (Marvell)

  30. P802.11ae – D4.0 - WG LB 180 802.11 Ballot #180 was the third 15 day Working Group technical recirculation Ballot asking the question "Should P802.11ae D4.0 be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot?". Ballot Opening Date:    Friday June 03, 2011 - 23:59 ETBallot Closing Date:   Saturday June 18, 2011 - 23:59 ET 278 eligible people are in this ballot group. 180 affirmative votes    8 negative votes     35 abstention votes ===   223 votes received  = 80.2% valid returns                                     =  15.7% valid abstentions APPROVAL RATE:180  affirmative votes       =   95.7 % affirmative  8  total negative votes  =     4.3 % negative Motion passes. There were 77 comments received. Bruce Kraemer (Marvell)

  31. P802.11s D12.0 - 5th Sponsor recirc The fifth IEEE P802.11s (MESH networking) 15 day recirculation Sponsor Ballot asked the question “Should  P802.11s  Draft 12.0 be forwarded to RevCom?” The official results for this Sponsor Ballot follow:Ballot Opening Date:   Friday  May 20, 2011 - 23:59 ETBallot Closing Date:     Saturday      June 04, 2011 - 23:59 ET  184 eligible people are in this ballot group.141 affirmative votes 4 negative votes with comments 0 negative votes without comments 9 abstention votes ======= 154  votes received  =  83.7 % valid returns                             =  5.8% valid abstentionsAPPROVAL RATE:141  affirmative votes        =      97.2 % affirmative   4  total negative votes  =     2.8  % negative The motion passes. There was 1 comment received indicating that the draft meets all editorial requirements. Bruce Kraemer (Marvell)

  32. P802.11Revmb D9.0 – 3rd Sponsor recirc The IEEE P802.11REVmb (802.11 roll-up revision) 20 day 3rd recirculation Sponsor Ballot asked the question “Should  P802.11REVmb  Draft 9.0 be forwarded to RevCom?” The official results for this Sponsor Ballot  follow:Ballot Opening Date:   Thursday June 02, 2011 - 23:59 ETBallot Closing Date:     Wednesday      June 22, 2011 - 23:59 ET   186 eligible people are in this ballot group.139 affirmative votes 11 negative votes with comments 0 negative votes without comments 10 abstention votes ======= 160  votes received  =  86.0 % valid returns                             =  6.3% valid abstentionsAPPROVAL RATE:139  affirmative votes       =      92.7 % affirmative   11  total negative votes  =      7.3  % negative The motion passes. There were 208 comments received Bruce Kraemer (Marvell)

More Related