350 likes | 606 Views
Chapter 1: Introduction Fraud Examination. Apa Penipuan dan Penyalahgunaan Kerja ? . Penggunaan pekerjaan Untuk memperkaya diri sendiri Melalui penyalahgunaan yang disengaja atau penggunaan yang tidak semestinya atas sumber daya majikan / aset. Defining Fraud.
E N D
Apa Penipuan dan Penyalahgunaan Kerja? Penggunaanpekerjaan Untukmemperkayadirisendiri Melaluipenyalahgunaan yang disengajaataupenggunaan yang tidaksemestinyaatassumberdayamajikan / aset
Defining Fraud Berdasarkanhukumumumadaempatunsurumum, yang semuanyaharusadauntukdikatakansebagai fraud: A Material false statement Pengetahuan bahwa pernyataan itu salah ketika diucapkan Tergantungpadalaporanolehkorban Adanyakerusakan
Defining Abuse(DefinisiPenyalahgunaan) • Sebuahperbuatancurang • Sebuahpraktikkorupsi • Penggunakanatauperlakuantidaksemestinya • Examples: • “Borrow” company equipment • Use employee discounts to purchased goods for friends and relatives • Take products belonging to the organization • Collect more money than due on expense reimbursements • Take a long lunch or break without approval • Use sick leave when not sick • Slow or sloppy work / pelan dan lemah kerja • Surf the Net at work / jaringan lbh batas • Work under influence of drugs/alcohol
Edwin H. Sutherland • First defined “white-collar crime” • Tindakpidanakorporasi • Individuals in corporate capacity • Theory of differential association • Kejahatanmerupakanhasildaripembelajaran • Bukangenetik • Dipelajaridarikelompok-kelompokpribadi
Donald R. Cressey Mempelajari orang yang melakukanpenggelapan Mengapa orang menjadi "pelanggarkepercayaan“ Mengembangkan Fraud Triangle
OPPORTUNITY The Fraud Triangle PRESSURE RATIONALIZATION
Nonsharable Problems Violation of Ascribed Obligation (Pelanggarandarikewajiban yang harusdilaksanakan) Masalah yang timbulakibatkegagalanpribadi Business reversals(kerugian) Physical isolation Status gaining Employer-employee relations
Cressey’s Offender Types • Independent businessmen • “Borrowing” • Funds really theirs • Long-term violators • “Borrowing” • Protect family (merekamenggelapkanuntukmenjagakeluargamerekadari rasa malu, aib, ataukemiskinan) • Company cheating them financially • Company generally dishonest • Absconders / menghindar • Take the money and run • Usually unmarried, loners • Blame “outside influences” or “personal defects”
W. Steve Albrecht Nine motivators of fraud Hidupdiluarkemampuan Keinginanuntukkeuntunganpribadi Hutangpribadi yang tinggi Sangatdekatdenganpelanggan MerasaGajitidaksebandingdenganpekerjaan Sikap Wheeler-dealer Tertantanguntukmengalahkanataumerusaksistem Perilakujudi yang berlebihan Tekanankeluargaataupasangan
The Fraud Scale • Situational pressures • Immediate problems with environment • Usually debts/losses • Perceived opportunities • Poor controls • Personal integrity • Individual code of behavior
Richard C. Hollinger Hollinger-Clark study (1983) Surveyed 10,000 workers Theft caused by job dissatisfaction True costs vastly understated
Employee Deviance • Two categories: • Acts against property • Production violations (goldbricking) • Strong relationship: theft and concern over financial situation
Age and Theft Direct correlation Younger employees less committed But, higher position = bigger theft Opportunity is only a secondary factor
Job Satisfaction and Deviance • Dissatisfied employees • More likely to break rules • Regardless of age/position • Trying to right perceived inequities • Wages in kind
Organizational Controls • Some impact, but limited • Hollinger studied five aspects: • Company policy • Selection of personnel • Inventory control • Security • Punishment
Hollinger’s Conclusions • Employee perception of controls is important • Increased security may hurt, not help • Employee-thieves exhibit other deviance • Sloppy work, sick leave abuses, etc. • “Hydraulic effect” • Management should be sensitive to employees • Pay special attention to young employees
Hollinger’s Conclusions Management must pay attantion to Four key aspects of policy development • Pemahamanyang jelasmengenaiperilakupencurian • Menyebarkaninformasi yang positifdanterusmenerus • KebijakanPenegakansanksi • Mengumumkansanksi
The Report to the Nation on Occupational Fraud and Abuse Largest fraud study ever Study of 2,608 fraud cases Reported by CFEs Total: $15 billion in losses $2.2 to $2.5 billion
Costs How to measure? Orgs don’t know what they lose Opinions of CFEs Six percent of gross revenues $400 billion per year Twice the U.S. defense budget
Median Loss by Age Direct and linear correlation between age and median loss Older tend to occupy higher ranking positions Greater access to revenues, assets, resources 5
Median Loss by Scheme Type *Represents size of misstatement rather than actual cash loss