1 / 21

Follow-up committee meeting 12 November, Uccle

CCI-HYDR - Climate change impact on hydrological extremes along rivers and urban drainage systems ADAPT – Towards an integrated tool for deciding about adaptation measures – case study: floods. Follow-up committee meeting 12 November, Uccle. Overview.

hruffin
Download Presentation

Follow-up committee meeting 12 November, Uccle

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CCI-HYDR - Climate change impact on hydrological extremes along rivers and urban drainage systems ADAPT – Towards an integrated tool for deciding about adaptation measures – case study: floods Follow-up committee meeting 12 November, Uccle

  2. Overview • Derivation of potential climate change scenarios for Belgium • Statistical analysis of trends and cycles in rainfall, evapotranspiration and flow series • Final selection climate change scenarios for Belgium • Impact modelling along rivers and urban drainage systems • Flood risk modelling • Identification of adaptation scenarios • Modelling the effects of adaptation measures • Evaluating adaptation measures CC scenarios CCI-HYDR Occurrence of low and high flows ADAPT Adaptation to high flows

  3. CCI-HYDR project - content

  4. CCI-HYDR project - questions

  5. Adapt – project: preliminary results Dender case • Social flood impact

  6. Dender case High RT 100 Low RT 100 Current RT 100

  7. Social hot spots

  8. Social risk modelling – SFI tool Exposure and flood characteristics Social flood impact Adaptive capacity Vulnerability SFI = E x Vp/Ac* * Based on Hilhorst 2004

  9. Indicators of social flood impact

  10. Indicators of social flood impact • Exposure • Location of houses by means of Cadmap and land use maps

  11. Indicators of social flood impact

  12. Indicators of social flood impact Adaptive capacity of society • Non-technical measures • Availability or resources and distribution across the population • Institutional structure • Human capital • Social capital • Risk spreading processes • Information • Perception of people Data gathered by interviews, policy documents and media

  13. Social risk modelling • Weighting • Flood characteristics: water level is most important • Vulnerability: equal weights • Adaptive capacity: equal weights • State of affairs • Flood characteristics: in progress • Vulnerability: finalized • Adaptive capacity: in progress

  14. Social flood impact knowledge table

  15. GIS output Flood map Vulnerability Adaptive capacity Buildings

  16. Social impact map

  17. Output: number of affected people per impact categorie Geraardsbergen and Ninove

  18. Scenarios • What is a scenario? • An image of the future that are neither predictions nor forecasts but an alternative image of how the future might unfold. (Nakicenovic et al. 2000) • Why using scenarios? • Taking socio-economic change into account • To deal with uncertainty • To raise awareness

  19. Socio-economic scenarios • Lieven aanvullen? • Narrative storylines: IPCC • Containing key elements of socio-economic change • Technology • Governance • Social and political values • Demography • Economy • Estimating parameters (data?) • Ecological vulnerability • Social vulnerability • Economic vulnerability

  20. Stakeholder participation • Who? • Decisionmakers at all levels, experts, water managers, interest groups and citizens • Why? • Increase social support • Take into accounts stakeholder knowledge • How in the Adapt project? • Which measures are feasible in the area? (interviews with water managers) • Which measures are acceptable? (interviews with decisionmakers, public officers, experts and focus groups with interest groups and citizens) • Which criteria are most preferred? (interviews)

  21. ADAPT project - questions

More Related