110 likes | 128 Views
ERCOT Update Management of the Balancing Account CMWG. Agenda. Why are we considering alternative methodologies for management of the Balancing Account? Concepts for an alternative methodology Next Steps NPRR at November PRS. Why?.
E N D
ERCOT UpdateManagement of the Balancing Account CMWG Pamela Shaw Settlements & Billing 10/6/2013
Agenda • Why are we considering alternative methodologies for management of the Balancing Account? • Concepts for an alternative methodology • Next Steps • NPRR at November PRS
Why? • Large CRR Shortfall in May 2013 prompted questions about the cause of the scenario and how to remedy it going forward • Questions of equity in the current methodology • We are NOT talking about CRR Auction Revenue that is always a revenue stream to QSEs with load • We ARE talking about the Balancing Account Distribution that varies month to month
Why? • In 10 of 31 months, CRRs were not fully funded • ~$30M not funded, in total • Percentage of CRR Payments not funded • Worst case March 2011: ~29% • Dec 2010 through June 2012: ~ 3% • Excess funds distributed to QSEs representing load in the other 21 months • ~$164M distributed, in total
Concept for Proposed Methodology Current Methodology • Current: after refunds for CRR shortfalls, distribute any excess funds to load (“close out” the balancing account for the month) • Current: CRRs remain short-paid if not enough funds to cover the shortfall • Establish a Rolling Balancing Account Fund • Proposed: on a monthly basis, after refunds for CRR shortfalls, deposit any excess into a “Rolling Balancing Account Fund” to be used to cover shortfalls in future months. Distribute to load when the funds exceeds a specified threshold.
Establish a Rolling Balancing Account Fund • Rolling Balancing Account Fund concepts • Continue to execute the monthly Balancing Account closure process to try to pay CRRs that were not fully funded through DAM Settlements • Remaining funds accumulate in the Rolling Balancing Account Fund • This Fund can be used to supplement refunds of shortfall charges in subsequent months. • In a month where additional funds are available in the Balancing Account and shortfalls are fully refunded, the Rolling Balancing Account Fund is refilled before allocating to QSEs with load. • If the “refill” activity brings the Rolling Balancing Account Fund over the designated Fund Cap, allocate the overage to QSEs with Load • Each month, maintain a Rolling Balancing Account Fund balance <= to the designated Fund Cap
Defining the Fund Cap • The Stakeholder Process will determine the correct value for the Fund Cap. • Statistics for consideration: Total Calculated CRR Shortfall not refunded, current method (all months 12/10 - 8/13 (33 months)) Full Refunds - 23 months Not fully refunded 10 months total: $ 29M Min (12/2012) $ 82K Max (5/2013) $ 9M Average $ 2.9M
Settlement Data – Current Methodology *Data included in spreadsheet posted with meeting materials
Example Data – Proposed Methodology *Estimated datasets included in spreadsheet posted with meeting materials