1 / 38

Phase I ESA

Phase I ESA. Environmental Site Assessment. Purpose. The purpose of this phase I ESA is to provide professional opinion on the potential hazardous substances that are on site 140-156 E. 14 th st. (Parcel A). Detailed Scope-of-Service.

hu-kelley
Download Presentation

Phase I ESA

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Phase I ESA Environmental Site Assessment

  2. Purpose • The purpose of this phase I ESA is to provide professional opinion on the potential hazardous substances that are on site 140-156 E. 14th st. (Parcel A)

  3. Detailed Scope-of-Service • Conducting a regulatory database search Of known underground storage tanks and land fills. • Hazardous waste generation or treatment • Storage and disposal facilities • & Surface contamination.

  4. Significant Assumptions • There are no assumptions that apply to this site.

  5. Limitations and Exceptions • Noapparent limitations that would limit the ability to complete the scope work.

  6. Special Terms and Conditions • There are no special terms and conditions that apply.

  7. User Reliance • Reports shall not be relied upon by or transferred to any other site. • Phase I ESA report has been prepared for use solely by COCH.

  8. Location and Legal Description • The property is located along the south and the east of 14th st.

  9. Subject Property and Vicinity Characteristics • Adjacent properties including residential and commercial properties. • Property was vacant at the time of site reconnaissance.

  10. Physical Settings • The soil surface layer has black silty clay loam. • No wetlands were identified. • Property was not located in flood zones

  11. Descriptions of Structures, Roads, and Other Improvements • Vacant property • With Grassland • Paved sidewalks

  12. Current Adjoining Property Uses • Identify potential environmental concerns. • Properties was were observed from the boundaries and public right-a-ways

  13. Title Records • URS was not provided with title insurance reports for the subject properties.

  14. Environmental Liens Use Limitations • EDR was not able locate the property • Environmental liens reports was not provided to URS.

  15. Specialized Knowledge • No specialized knowledge beyond what was discussed throughout the reports • It was conveyed to URS during the preparation of the report

  16. Owner, Site Manager, and Occupant Information • Subject property was obtained in tax reclaimation

  17. Reason for ConductingPhase I ESA • The subject property is owned by COCH.

  18. Other Information • URS was provided with eligibility determination for Brownfield assessment. • Parcel A contained S&D Body Shop

  19. Standard Environmental Records • Subject was not listed in any database searched by the EDR

  20. Additional Environmental Records • URS attempted to conduct file reviews at a applicable state, municipal and county offices.

  21. Historical Use • Developed since at least 1929 • Two square buildings on the northeast and northwest

  22. Aerial Photographs • Due to poor quality structures were difficult to disconcern

  23. Topographic Maps • Review maps of Calumet City and Harvey

  24. Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps • Sandborn maps were reviewed for the subject property provided form the EDR • Dated 1911, 1950 1966,1975

  25. City Directories • City directory search was only conducted for the subject property address 284 E 14th Street

  26. Methodology and Limiting Conditions • Clear and 30 degrees Fahrenheit no limitations

  27. Interior and Exterior Observations • Vacant and grassed at the time • Mounds of garbage found at the site

  28. Hazardous Substances and Petroleum Products • Not observed at the subject property

  29. Underground/ Aboveground Storage Tanks • No evidence of UST’s or AST’s at the site

  30. Drains and Sumps • No drains or sumps were observed • Storm water is managed by street flow or surface infiltration. • The site area surrounding roadways and the municipal combined sewer system

  31. Waste Water • No process or sanitary waste water is generated on site • Storm water flows to Storm drains located in the adjacent streets

  32. Utilities • As the subjects property is vacant, utilities are not provided.

  33. Wells • No wells were observed or reported on or adjacent to the subject property during reconnaissance. • Site contacts were not aware of wells at the subject property.

  34. Pits, Ponds, Lagoons • No pits, ponds or lagoons were observed on the subject property during the property visit.

  35. PCB-Containing and Hydraulic Equipment • Five pole mounted transformers at the site • Owners not known

  36. Other Physical Evidence of Contamination • No other physical evidence of contamination was observed on the subject property during URS site reconnaissance with the exception of scattered debris that’s observed on the subject property.

  37. Conclusions • The historical uses of are considered REC’s • Parcel A

  38. Environmental Professionals Involved • Stacy McCance • Sarah Ruben

More Related