1 / 13

FSD 01 Detectors Simulation Vs Measurements

FSD 01 Detectors Simulation Vs Measurements. Sudip Chatterji and Indian Students (Ghosh P, Bansal Y, Joshi N and Sharma N ) GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research GmbH STS Work Group Meeting 10 th January 2012. Outline. Motivation Simulation Vs Measurements Fluence 1e12 n/cm 2

hu-pace
Download Presentation

FSD 01 Detectors Simulation Vs Measurements

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. FSD 01 Detectors Simulation Vs Measurements SudipChatterji and Indian Students(Ghosh P, Bansal Y, Joshi N and Sharma N ) GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research GmbH STS Work Group Meeting 10th January 2012

  2. Outline • Motivation • Simulation Vs Measurements • Fluence 1e12 n/cm2 • Fluence 1e13 n/cm2 • Fluence 3e13 n/cm2 • Fluence 1e14 n/cm2 • Overview & Analysis

  3. 1. Motivation • To study and verify the FSD Detectors IV & CV Characteristics • To verify the Simulation module for FSD parameters using the models used previously • Role of space charge effect on the Breakdown voltages • To study and validate different models for annealing parameter. • To extract Annealing time constants

  4. 2.1.1 Simulation Vs Measurements Fluence ø=1e12(n/cm2)

  5. 2.1.2 Simulation Vs Measurements Fluence ø=1e12(n/cm2) • VFD{Measured} ~ 40V • VFD{Simulated} ~ 44V • Leakage current almost comparable • Simulation results holds good

  6. 2.2.1 Simulation Vs Measurements Fluence ø=1e13(n/cm2)

  7. 2.2.2 Simulation Vs Measurements Fluence ø=1e13(n/cm2) • VFD{Measured} ~ 12V • VFD{Simulated} ~ 15V • Leakage current almost comparable • Simulation results almost holds good

  8. 2.3.1 Simulation Vs Measurements Fluence ø=3e13(n/cm2)

  9. 2.3.2 Simulation Vs MeasurementsFluence ø=3e13(n/cm2) • Pink curve => Good Detector • VFD{Measured} ~80 V • VFD{Simulated} ~ 90V • Leakage current almost comparable, Simulation results almost holds good • Red curve => Bad Detector • VFD{Measured} ~ not observed • Leakage Current much higher than expected.

  10. 2.4.1 Simulation Vs Measurements Fluence ø=1e14(n/cm2)

  11. 2.4.2 Simulation Vs Measurements Fluence ø=1e14(n/cm2) • VFD{Measured} & {Simulated} = not observed • BD {Measured} = 220V • BD {Simulated} = 250V • Leakage current almost comparable but • Breakdown appear early in measurements (red & green) • Impact of Qf Observed • Increasing the Qf Decreases Break Down voltage ( blue to pink ~ 8e11 1e12) • May be the Qf ~ 3e12 in measured Detectors

  12. 3.1 Simulation Vs MeasurementOverview Measured Values for FSD 01 Simulated Values for FSD 01

  13. 3.2 Simulation Vs MeasurementAnalysis • Simulation results holds good with results from FSD01 Detectors. • Leakage current is comparable in both the cases • VFD{Measured} ~ VFD{Simulated} • Type inversion observed after Fluence=1e13 n/cm2 • With some bad detectors, statistics in case of detectors becomes important to verify the simulation results.

More Related