1 / 26

Improvers

Improvers. Week 7 Review of Pre-emptive Bidding. Pre-emptive Bidding. Objective To make it difficult for opponents to find the correct contract when we have a weak hand with a long suit and they have the majority of the HCP. Pre-emptive Bidding. Requirements A 7 card suit

hyacinth-rocha
Download Presentation

Improvers

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Improvers Week 7 Review of Pre-emptive Bidding

  2. Pre-emptive Bidding • Objective • To make it difficult for opponents to find the correct contract when we have a weak hand with a long suit and they have the majority of the HCP

  3. Pre-emptive Bidding • Requirements • A 7 card suit • Weak hand (usually 5-9 HCP) • No 4 card major in another suit • Partner has not bid

  4. Pre-emptive Bidding • Bid as high as we can safely • Allow for the contract being doubled • Should be cheaper than opponents making game • If vulnerable can go 1 off • If non vulnerable can go 2 off

  5. Count Winners • With 7 in suit assume rest divide 2/2/2 • Count 5 winners • Add A or K (count each as a winner) • Add outside suit winners • Be Optimistic • Add 3 non vulnerable or 2 vulnerable • If result is 9 bid 3 of the suit • If the result is 10 bid 4 of the suit • Bid result up to game

  6. Pre-empt Example 1  7  4  2 • 7 HCP • 7 ‘s • 7 winners • Bid vul 3  • Bid non vul 4   A  K  T  9  7  6  4  3  6  5

  7. Pre-empt Example 2  7  4  2 • 7 HCP • 8 ‘s • 8 winners • Bid vul 4 • Bid non vul 5  A  K  T  9  7  6  4  3  2  6

  8. Pre-empt Example 3  J  7  4  2 • 8 HCP • 7 ‘s • 7 winners • 4 ‘s • Close to rule of 20 • Bid 1  • Allows partner a bid to find a fit in   A  K  T  9  7  6  4  3  6

  9. Pre-empt Example 4  K  T  8 • 6 HCP • 7 ‘s • 6 winners • Bid vul Pass • Bid non vul 3  J  7  6  5  4  3  2  Q  8  6

  10. Pre-empt Example 5  K  T  8 • 8 HCP • 7 ‘s • 7 winners • Bid vul 3 • Bid non vul 4  K  7  6  5  4  3  2  Q  8  6

  11. Pre-empt Example 6  K  T  8 • 12 HCP • 7 ‘s • 8 winners • Bid 1 • Too strong for pre-empt  K  7  6  5  4  3  2  Q  8  A

  12. Pre-empt Example 7 • Extreme example • 7 HCP • 9 ‘s • 9 winners • Bid 5 any vul • If opponents overcall bid 6  7  5  4  5  A  K  T  8  6  5  4  3  2

  13. Pre-empt Example 8 • Extreme example • 3 HCP • 9 ‘s • 8 winners • Bid 5  any vul • If opponents overcall bid again  7  5  4  5  K  T  9  8  6  5  4  3  2

  14. Pre-emptive Bids • Compete strongly with shapely weak hands • Normally after a pre-empt do NOT re-bid if opponents overcall • You’ve had your say - leave it to partner • Do not pre-empt if partner has bid • HCP are a guide – the longer the suit the less HCP matter • Count of winners is a better guide

  15. Responding to Partner’s Pre-empt • The pre-empt is meant to put off opponents • It can also make it difficult for us! • As partner is weak we need to be strong to bid on • Partner will not have many cards in outside suits

  16. Response to Pre-empt Example 1  A  J  T  6  5 • Partner opens 3  • 17 HCP • Partner is weak • We have 3  • Entries to partners long suit • Stops in other suits • Bid 3NT  A  J  9  K  6  A  6  2

  17. Response to Pre-empt Example 2  A  J  T  6  5 • Partner opens 3  • 17 HCP • Partner is weak • We have 2 • Too few entries to partners long suit for NT • Bid 5 • If partner opens 4 bid 4NT (Blackwood)  A  J  9  A  K  6  6  2

  18. Response to Pre-empt Example 3  A  J  T  6  5 • Partner opens 3  • 21 HCP • Partner is weak • We have 2 • Too few entries to partners long suit • Bid 4NT (Blackwood) • If partner bids 5  (No key cards) then Pass • If partner bids 5 (1 key card) or 5 (2 key cards) bid 6  • If partner bids 5 (2 key cards + Q) bid 7NT!  A  K  Q  A  K  6  6  2

  19. Response to Pre-empt Example 4  4  3 • Partner opens 3 • 14 HCP • Partner is weak • We have 2 • Too few entries to partners long suit for NT • Bid 4 • Bit of a risky bid but worth a go  K  J  T  6  2  A  6  5  A  Q  5

  20. Response to Pre-empt Example 5  4  3 • Partner opens 3 • 17 HCP • Partner is weak • We have 2 • Too few entries to partners long suit for NT • Bid 4NT (Blackwood) • With 2 key cards bid 6 with fewer bid 5  A  K  J  T  2  A  6  5  A  Q  5

  21. Responses to Pre-empts • Always remember partner is weak • Bid on with strong hands • Only bid a new suit with 6+ cards – partner will Pass a new suit bid • It may be a bit of a guess • Only go to NT with 3 of partners pre-empt suit – you need entries

  22. Defence to Pre-empts • Very difficult • That’s why we pre-empt! • Overcall with a 6+card suit • Use Take Out Doubles with 16+ HCP • With 20+HCP and 2 stops in the pre-empt suit bid 3NT • It often involves a guess

  23. Defence example 1  J  T • Opponent opens 3  • 17 HCP • Good 6 card suit • Bid 4  K  8  A  Q  8  A  K  9  8  5  3

  24. Defence example 2  A  J  T  4 • Opponent opens 3 • 18 HCP • Strong hand • Bid * for take out • Partner can bid a suit • Or leave for penalties  K  8  A  Q  8  A  9  5  3

  25. Defence example 3  A  J  4 • Opponent opens 3 • 20 HCP • Strong hand • 2 stops in  • Bid 3NT • Partner should Pass unless looking for slam  K  Q  8  A  Q  8  A  9  5  3

  26. Summary • Use Pre-empts to make life difficult for opponents • If you have a 7+ card suit and are in doubt bid the pre-empt! • You can also pre-empt over opponents bids – double jump is a pre-empt • Do NOT overbid after partner pre-empts - never punish partner for competing • When bidding after opponents pre-empt its often a guess that can go wrong • But it’s the same for the other tables!

More Related