1 / 8

Groups and Social Order I

Groups and Social Order I. Dan Ryan Fall 2012. Division of Social Sciences . Previously. Laissez-faire ("just let them alone") approach to market society attractive b/c it appears supra-political and built on human “nature” but ( 1) boom and bust

ida
Download Presentation

Groups and Social Order I

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Groups and Social Order I Dan Ryan Fall 2012 Division of Social Sciences

  2. Previously • Laissez-faire ("just let them alone") approach to market society • attractive b/c it appears supra-political and built on human “nature” but • (1) boom and bust • (2) most efficient use of resources may be socially optimal but defer redistribution

  3. Chaos Unregulated Self-interested Interaction Cooperation Predictability Contingent Conditions

  4. Society is Clumpy • What is a group? • two or more humans • who interact • share similar characteristics • collectively have a sense of unity/identity • interdependence or objective similarity

  5. Cohesion and Solidarity

  6. Dependence and Obligation

  7. Quick View • Goffman – division of society into groups/categories can lead to suboptimal outcomes • Freud – infant socialization internalizes parent as censor making humans capable of being in society • Durkheim – individual behavior follows on level of attachment to group and level of group regulation • Tocqueville – groups not a threat to state, but a practice ground • Hechter – groups vary in terms of what they offer and what they demand • Coleman – “selfish” incentive to control behavior with externalities • Horne – why waste effort sanctioning? In cohesive groups it is rewarded • Olson – small groups can overcome free rider problem by mutual surveillance and selective incentives • Hechter et al. – groups handle a lot of the order production • Centolaet al. – groups can foster enforcement of unpopular norms

More Related