1 / 12

System Development Performance Measurement Project

PSM. System Development Performance Measurement Project. A Top Systems Engineering Issue.

idalia
Download Presentation

System Development Performance Measurement Project

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PSM System Development Performance Measurement Project

  2. A Top Systems Engineering Issue Technical decision makers do not have the right information & insight at the right time to support informed & proactive decision making or may not act on all the technical information available to ensure effective & efficient program planning, management & execution. [NDIA Top Systems Engineering (SE) Issues (2010)] In September 2010, the NDIA Systems Engineering Effectiveness Committee chartered a working group to identify a small set of key leading indicators that would help address this issue.

  3. System Development Performance Measurement Project Identify potential high value • measures, • indicators, and • methods for managing programs, particularly in support of • making better technical decisions and • providing better insight into technical risk at key program milestonesduring • Technology Development and • Engineering and Manufacturing Development for both the acquirer and supplier Phase 1 Report is at www.ndia.org. Link to the Systems Engineering Division, and their page for Studies and Publications. First item at this page. Report is also available at www.psmsc.com under Products.

  4. Phase 1 Recommended Leading Indicators

  5. Requirements & Interfaces

  6. Staffing & Risk

  7. Technical Performance, Technical Maturity andManufacturability

  8. Example: Interface Stability

  9. Example: Interface Stability

  10. Example: Interface Stability

  11. Phase 2 Directions • Determine leading indicators that address the other important information needs identified by the working group • Architecture • Affordability • Testability • Requirements Verification and Validation • Defects and Errors • Validate initial indicator set via survey and/or pilots • Recommendations on Benchmarking • Harmonize contractor reporting and government requirements Contact Pete McLoone, peter.j.mcloone@lmco.com, for more information.

  12. 2012 StrategyLeverage Other Industry Teams Affordability Indicator(s) Report PSM Affordability Measurement Project NDIA Test/ Eval WG ?? SDPM Core Team NDIA Ver/Val WG ?? Architecture Indicator(s) ? PSM Architecture Design Measurement Project Defects and Errors Indicator(s) Reqmts V&V Indicator(s) Testability Indicator(s)

More Related