1 / 7

Grassroots Nonprofit vs. Regional Powerhouse: Comparative Case Study on Reaching the Next Step

This qualitative study examines the process of nonprofit growth and reaching the next stage through a comparison of a grassroots organization and a regional powerhouse. The study identifies key factors, challenges, and opportunities faced by nonprofits in different stages of development.

ihinton
Download Presentation

Grassroots Nonprofit vs. Regional Powerhouse: Comparative Case Study on Reaching the Next Step

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Grassroots Nonprofit vs. Regional Powerhouse:A Qualitative Comparative Case Study on Reaching the Next Step Hanna R. Clark Central Michigan University

  2. NLA Competencies Addressed: • Program Development • Volunteer & Human Resource Management • Communication, Marketing & Public Relations • Financial Resource Development & Management The Life Stages of Nonprofits STAGE 1 STAGE 2 STAGE 3 STAGE 5 STAGE 4 • The organization is developed and its program is beginning to be created • Still high energy and enthusiasm • The organization is yet to be founded; it remains a dream or an idea • Characterized by enthusiasm, energy, and creativity • The organization is buildings its foundation and experiencing growth • Emphasis on accountability, but rapid growth is difficult to manage • The organization revisits its mission and programs to initiate changes • Minor changes = back to Stage 4 Major changes = back to Stage 2 • The organization is stable and mature (can be on autopilot) • Risk of becoming stagnant; maintaining momentum is a concern Produce and Sustain Imagine and Inspire Review and Renew Ground and Grow Found and Frame (Worth, 2017, p. 192)

  3. Research Question, Methodology, and Results (Idea Goals/Objectives) • Research Question(s): What does it take to grow a nonprofit? How does a nonprofit reach the next step? • Methodology: • Electronic survey/interview sent to Board members of the Keisha Y. Brown Angel Wings Fund and Susan G. Komen Michigan staff (total responses= 9) • Supplemented with a review of related scholarly literature • Identified limitations: scope, subjectivity of survey • Commonalities: • Similar domains (cancer-oriented) • Created within the past decade • Host annual events • Geographically comparable, similar stakeholders • Board sizes are comparable (11 members vs 13 members) • Honor a deceased individual (expressed in the name of the organization)

  4. Literature Review (Student Activities)

  5. SWOT Analysis of Angel Wings Fund (Student & Idea Outcomes) Strengths Weaknesses • Passionate Board and Executive Director (Survey Response) • Strong relationship with CMU students and staff (Survey Response) • Utilization of interns for marketing and promotion (Survey Response) • Signature events & community recognition (Survey Response) • Board is not composed of members with diverse background/expertise (Boyce, et al., 2007) • Lack of staff to distribute workload (Survey Response) • Absence of an objective way to measure successes (Survey Response) Threats Opportunities • More avenues for funding could be explored (Survey Response) • A more objective method to measure success could be developed and implemented (Sherman & Sinuany-Stern, 2014, p. 4) • Exploration of the development of a long-term strategic plan (Liket & Maas, 2015, p. 279) • College students are eager to gain hands-on experience, internships (Survey Response) • Potential for Founder’s Syndrome (Worth, 2017, p. 121) • Competition among similar organizations (Survey Response) • Nonprofits in the growth stage are challenging to manage (Worth, 2017, p. 192)

  6. The Next Steps (Idea/Activity Impact) Events & Programming Resources & Funding Partnerships & Outreach Marketing & Promotion • Tailor outreach to be meaningful and of interest to other organizations • Volunteer at their events if possible • 2. Determine if a stakeholder analysis could be beneficial • 3. Decide whether a capacity building model could be followed and implemented Reassess programs/events that are already occurring throughout the community (5k, 3-on-3 basketball tournament, etc.) Contemplate developing an objective method to measuring successes Consider Board composition (skills, expertise, etc.) when appointing new members • Consider various new avenues for funding (sponsorships, third-party fundraisers, grant writing, etc.) • Diversify fundraising streams by developing new mediums for fundraising (other than events) • i.e. internet fundraisers, mailing campaigns, etc. • 3. Determine if new positions can be created for CMU students • Explore more opportunities to promote transparency • Make documents more accessible to stakeholders • Expand social media and internet presence (and remain active on all outlets) • GuideStar, Twitter, Instagram, etc. • 3. Consider the creation of marketing partnerships with local businesses

  7. References Boyce, D., Griffith, G., & King, J. (2007). Best Practices in Nonprofit Governance: Dealing with “Voluntary” Reforms. Corporate Governance Advisor, 15(3), pp. 25-28. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com/docview/197772950/fulltextPDF/3A5E768867D4008PQ/1?accountid=10181 James, E. (1983). How Nonprofits Grow: A Model. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 2(3), pp. 350-366. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3324446.pdf?refreqid=excelsior%3A54edf17786ee55b3478c41d30c6b5111 Keisha Y. Brown Angel Wings Fund. (2018, November 16). Retrieved from http://angelwingsfund.org/ Liket, K.C. & Maas, K. (2015). Nonprofit Organizational Effectiveness: Analysis of Best Practices. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(2) pp. 268–296. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0899764013510064 Nonprofit World. (1998). Yes, the Internet Sounds Great, But Is It Really for Us? Nonprofit World, 16(2), pp. 5- 8. Retrieved from https://www.snpo.org/publications/articles.php Sherman, H.D. & Sinuany-Stern, Z. (2014) Operations Research in the Public Sector and Nonprofit Organizations. Annals of Operations Research, 221(1), pp. 1-8. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10479-014-1695-2 Susan, G. Komen Michigan. (2018, November 16). Retrieved from https://komenmichigan.org/ Worth, M.J. (2017). Developing Strategy and Building Capacity. Nonprofit Management Principles and Practice, 4th ed. (pp. 171-198). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. To Donate: Keisha Y. Brown Angel Wings Fund: (989) 621-1310 AngelWingsFund@gmail.com Website: http://angelwingsfund.org/ To Donate: Susan G. Komen Michigan: (517) 886-4901 (Lansing)info@komenmichigan.org Website: https://komenmichigan.org/ *Special thanks to the Central Michigan University Honors Program for conference funding

More Related