250 likes | 396 Views
Research team. Co-authorsRitu Agarwal, PhDU MarylandCorey Angst, PhDNotre DameCate Desroches, PhDMGH. . BCBSMAMegan BellAdrienne Cyrulik, MPHTufts Health PlanJulie NewtonZix CorporationAngus MacDonaldScott Plunkett. Background. Promise of e-prescribingImproved safetyValueEfficien
E N D
1. E-prescribing in community-based practices: successes and barriers Michael A Fischer, M.D., M.S.
Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics
Department of Medicine
Brigham and Women’s Hospital
Harvard Medical School
2. Research team Co-authors
Ritu Agarwal, PhD
U Maryland
Corey Angst, PhD
Notre Dame
Cate Desroches, PhD
MGH
3. Background Promise of e-prescribing
Improved safety
Value
Efficiency
Slow spread to community-based practices
Uncertain what drives successful e-prescribing uptake in community setting
4. Study setting Initiated by BCBSMA and Tufts Health Plan
Partnered with ZixCorp, providing physicians with PocketScript system
Program began in early 2004
5. Prior studies – erx adoption
6. Prior studies – e-rx and costs
7. Prior studies – e-rx and safety Most alerts over-ridden by prescribers
Weingart et al. Arch Int Med, 2003
Reviews suggest reduced ADEs, but inadequate studies in outpatient setting
Ammenwerth et al. JAMIA, 2008
8. Study questions What is the experience of community-based practices that adopt electronic prescribing systems?
What barriers remain to successful adoption and use of e-prescribing?
Where has e-prescribing succeeded; has it created new problems?
9. Study design Focus groups
Conducted spring 2008
Prescribers and office staff
Internal medicine, pediatrics, FP, cardiology, nephrology
Both current and former users
High/low volume, abandoned, transitioned to EMR
Interviews
Detailed discussions with prescribers
10. Findings E-prescribing positives
Ongoing challenges/barriers
11. E-prescribing positives Prescription security
Financial gain
Office efficiency
Medication safety
Insurance issues
Communication with pharmacy
12. E-prescribing positives Prescription security
Less people touch the actual prescription
Patients cannot lose the prescription
Patients cannot tamper with prescription
13. E-prescribing positives Financial gain
Direct incentives a major factor
Initial adoption subsidized
Later incentives for ongoing use
Potential gains in patient satisfaction
“if we can reduce wait times, we’ve succeeded”
Unclear of RoI in terms of practice billing
14. E-prescribing positives Office efficiency
Major changes in practice workflow
Less calls for front-end staff
Refills and other non-critical medication issues can be batched for MD review
Frees staff time and attention
Less interruption of work
Pharmacy information is updated and accurate
Perceived ROI, but hard to quantify
15. E-prescribing positives Medication safety
Quick review of patient medication history
Available round the clock, out of office
Alerts about drug-drug interactions
Office staff appreciated reminders
Physicians less certain, many alerts dismissed
Ability to identify patients on a specific drug
Especially useful for recalls
“I can identify all the patients on..”
16. E-prescribing positives Insurance issues
Can see if a drug is not covered
Avoids callbacks, increased patient satisfaction
Ability to identify patients on a specific drug
Also useful for prescribing incentive programs
17. E-prescribing positives Communication with pharmacy
Timely flow of information
Ability to send specific messages
e.g.: “no more refills until patient sees doctor”
18. Ongoing challenges/barriers Learning curve
Usability
Reliability
Safety concerns
Patient resistance
Data security
19. Ongoing challenges/barriers Learning curve
New skill: “not covered in medical school”
Difficult for older prescribers
High burden on champions/superusers
New tasks for some personnel – source of resistance
Lack of support
“Locked in” with initial vendor choice
20. Ongoing challenges/barriers Usability
Types of devices/interfaces
Problems with some pharmacies
Inability to transmit to PBMs
Reliability
Connectivity/network problems, loss of productivity
Resistance for sick patients or weekends
21. Ongoing challenges/barriers Safety concerns
Selecting wrong patient
Selecting wrong drug (Cipro/Cialis)
Some doses/formulations not in system
Drug alerts not perceived as helpful: “ignore almost all”
Some alerts may be handled by non-prescribers in the process of queuing
22. Ongoing challenges/barriers Patient resistance
Wanting something in hand (older pts)
Bad experiences with failed transmissions
Inability to transmit to PBMs
Data security
Concern about whether transmitting patient data creates liability exposure
Concern about prescribing data and tracking/profiling
Who owns the data: cost of changing
23. Summary observations Overall positive experience – almost none would “turn back the clock”
Successes: office efficiency, pharmacy communication, formulary information, prescription security
Barriers/challenges: Learning curve, reliability, questionable safety impact
24. Summary observations Benefits more apparent in larger practices with high volume of chronic mediations
More opportunities to streamline workflow
Prescription volume/management is seen as a major issue at baseline
Possible financial gains easier to perceive
25. Next steps On-site visits to observe system use, validate focus group observations
Large-sample survey to test generalizability of initial findings
Quantitative studies of e-rx impact on cost, safety, adherence, clinical outcomes