360 likes | 487 Views
Pneumology. Istanbul, 7. 5. 2010. Standards for neoadjuvant Treatment. Rudolf M. Huber. University of Munich. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Istanbul, 7. 5. 2010. ‘‘ Neoadjuvant ’’ chemotherapy means treatment given prior to surgery Rationale:
E N D
Pneumology Istanbul, 7. 5. 2010 Standards for neoadjuvant Treatment Rudolf M. Huber University of Munich
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy Istanbul, 7. 5. 2010 • ‘‘Neoadjuvant’’ chemotherapy means treatment given prior to surgery • Rationale: • shrink the tumour to facilitate and simplify surgery • treat occult micrometastases • inhibit tumour growth factor release during surgery • Does not intend to make an inoperable tumour operable (“downstaging chemo-therapy”) Huber
Expected Outcome After Surgical Resection in Operable NSCLC Pisters and Le Chevalier. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:3270-3278 Huber
N2 Subgroups and survivalResected NSCLC André F ea. JCO 18 (2000) N = 562 Huber
Accuracy of stagingNSCLC – N2 disease Weder W. Ann Oncol 19 (Supplement 7): vii28–vii30, 2008 Huber Huber
IIIA1 incidental nodal metastases found on final surgical pathology IIIA2single nodal metastasis, recognized intraoperatively IIIA3Mediastinal nodal metastases, detected preoperatively by mediastinoscopy or PET IIIA4„Bulky“, multi-station NSCLC:IIIAN2– subsets Adapted from ACCP Guideline. Chest 2003 Huber
NSCLC Stage III Treatment Modalities Surgery Surgery + Chemo Surgery + RT Tri-modality Chemotherapy RT Chemo + RT Balance between local and systemic control Huber
CT effect & stage CT may be detrimental for stage IA, but stage IA patients were generally not given the potentially best combination cisplatin + vinorelbine (13% of stage IA patients versus ~43% for other stages) META LA CE Huber
NSCLC Stage IIIACT + OP (+ RT) vs. OP (+ RT) DesignPat.pN2Survival (median) Passet al.2 x PE - OP - 4 x PE 27 27 29 1992 OP - RT 16p = 0.1 Rothet al.3 x PEC - OP - (3 x PEC) 60 54 64 1994 OP 11 p = 0.008 Rosellet al. 3 x MIC - OP - RT 60 44 26 1994 OP - RT 8 p = 0.001 Huber
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy – French Trial Depierre A ea. J Clin Oncol; 20:247-253 2002 • Randomized trial comparing perioperative chemotherapy (PCT) to primary surgery (PRS): • Preoperative CT: two cycles of mitomycin (6 mg/m2, d 1), ifosfamide (1.5 g/m2, d 1 to 3) and cisplatin (30 mg/m2, d 1 to 3) • Postoperative CT (responders): two additional cycles • Thoracic radiotherapy for all pT3 or pN2 pts • Benefit confined to N0 to N1 disease (RR 0.68; 95% CI, .49 to .96; P = .027) Huber
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy – French Trial Overall survival by treatment arm: arm A, PRS; arm B, PCT + surgery Depierre A ea. J Clin Oncol; 20:247-253 2002 Huber
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy – French Trial Overall survival by treatment arm and by nodal status Depierre A ea. J Clin Oncol; 20:247-253 2002 Huber
Operable NSCLC: Neoadjuvant CT– MRC LU22/NVALT2/EORTC08012 Gilligan D ea. Lancet 2007; 369: 1929–37 Huber
PFS OS Operable NSCLC: Neoadjuvant CT MRC LU22/NVALT2/ EORTC08012 CT … 3 cycles of platinum based chemotherapy Gilligan D ea. Lancet 2007; 369: 1929–37 Huber
Operable NSCLC Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Test for heterogeneity: Chi-squared 3.04, 7 degrees of freedom, p=0.88, I2=0%. Test for overall effect: Z=1.78, p=0.07. Gilligan D ea. Lancet 2007; 369: 1929–37 Huber
Stage IB - IIIA NSCLC n = 353 (of planned 600) R Arm A: C + S (+RT) Arm B: S S9900: A phase III trial of surgery alone or surgery plus preoperative paclitaxel/ carboplatin (PC) in early stage NSCLC • P:225 mg/m2 in 3 hours, C:AUC=6 • 3 cycles, q 3 weeks • PS 0-1, postop. FEV1≥1 L Pisters K ea. ASCO 2005, LBA7012 Huber
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy S9900 Overall survival by treatment arm (median follow-up, 64 months) Pisters KMW ea. J Clin Oncol; 28:1843-1849 2010 Huber
NATCH – Stages at Surgery, Survival Felip E ea. ASCO 2009 Abstract # 7500, mod. from Wakelee H, discussion Huber Huber
Stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC PS 0-1 n = 396 R Arm A: CT/RT (45 Gy) + S + CT Arm B: CT/RT (61 Gy) +CT Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy - Operable: surgery vs. no surgery • CT: Cisplatin 50 mg/m2 d1,8; Etoposid 50 mg/m2 d1-5 • TRD: 6,9% (14) arm A vs. 1,6% (3) Arm B North American Intergroup 0139 (RTOG 9309) K. Albain et al. Proc Am Soc ClinOncol 2003;22:2497(abstr) und 2005 abstr. 7014 Albain KS ea. Lancet 2009; 374: 379–86 Huber
North American Intergroup 0139(RTOG 9309) * albumin was ≥ 85% of the normal value with <10% weight loss within 3 months Mod. from K. Albain ea. Proc Am Soc ClinOncol 2005 abstr. 7014 Huber
North American Intergroup 0139 (RTOG 9309) The primary endpoint was overall survival K. Albain et al. Proc Am Soc ClinOncol 2005 abstr. 7014 Huber
North American Intergroup 0139 (RTOG 9309) The primary endpoint was overall survival Overall survival Albain KS ea. Lancet 2009; 374: 379–86
North American Intergroup 0139 (RTOG 9309) Overall survival pneumonectomy subset of post-pneumonectomy patients from the intention-to-treat population in group 1 vs. matched cohort in group 2 Albain KS ea. Lancet 2009; 374: 379–86 Huber
Stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC Induction chemotherapy n = 572 R Arm A: S (+RT) Arm B: RT Radical surgery vs. thoracic radiotherapy in IIIA-N2 NSCLC after response to induction chemotherapy(EORTC 08941) • 3 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy • Response randomisation • In the radiotherapy arm at least 60 Gy + 40 Gy to the mediastinum van Meerbeeck JP ea. ASCO 2005, LBA7015 J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2007 99:442-450; doi:10.1093/jnci/djk093 Huber
Radical surgery vs. thoracic radiotherapy in IIIA-N2 NSCLC after response to induction chemotherapy (EORTC 08941) • 572 patients induction chemotherapy, 61,5 % response • Radical resection 51 %, mortality 4 % (pneum-ectomy!) • Median, 2- and 5-year OS: surgery vs. TRT 16.4 vs.17.5 months, 35 vs. 41% and 16 vs. 13% • Median and 2-year PFS are 9.0 vs.11.4 months and 27 vs. 24%, (p= 0.6) • no advantage from surgery van Meerbeeck JP ea. ASCO 2005, LBA7015 Huber
Resection Vs Radiotherapy After Induction Chemotherapy in Stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC Overall survival rates estimated from time of randomization van Meerbeeck JP ea. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2007 99:442-450; doi:10.1093/jnci/djk093 Huber
Neoadjuvant Chemo- vs. RCT • Phase III in stage III NSCLC • In both arms, a similar percentage could be sent to surgery (even in stage IIIB) • Bimodality induction: • trend toward better resection rates (R0) • higher complication rate, especially bronchial stump insufficiency Thomas M ea. JCO 22 (2004), 14S, 704. Lancet Oncol, July 1, 2008; 9(7): 636-48
Neoadjuvant therapy: Chemo- vs. Chemoradio-Therapy • In patients with stage III NSCLC amenable to surgery, preoperative chemoradiation in addition to chemotherapy increases pathological response and mediastinal downstaging, but does not improve survival. • After induction with chemoradiation, pneumonectomy should be avoided. Thomas M ea. Lancet Oncol, July 1, 2008; 9(7): 636-48 Huber
NSCLC cN2-Status and Resection Survival with/without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n = 332) n 5 Y. – Surv.[%] cN2 237 5 cN2 + neoadjuvantCTh 95 18 cN2 + neoadjuvantCTh 69 26 with response + R0 Andre ea., J Clin Oncol 18: 2981 (2000) Huber
Cisplatin vs. Carboplatin Meta-Analysis: Survival HR = 1.12, 95 % CI 1.01-1,23 Ardizzoni A ea. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007;99: 847 – 57 Huber
Cisplatin 50 mg / m2 d 1, 2 Docetaxel 85 mg / m2 d 1 OP * 3 x * If R1/2: RTX (60 Gy; 2 Gy/d) NSCLC Stage IIIA (N2): CT + OP • 90 patients • ECOG 0/1, median age 60 yrs • T 1-3 N2 (mediastinoscopy) • N2-2L (20/62) Betticher et al., J Clin Oncol 21: 1752 (2003) Istanbul, 7. 5. 2010 Huber
NSCLC Stage IIIA (N2): CT + OP RR PD OP R0 TL RTX pCRpN0/1 66 % 10 % 87 % 48 % 3 % 37 % 16 %50 % Survival All Pts pN0/1 pN2 Median 28 Mo. 53 Mo. 16 Mo. 3 Yr. Survival 36 % 61 %11 % Betticher et al., J Clin Oncol 21: 1752 (2003) Istanbul, 7. 5. 2010 Huber
Neoadjuvant Treatment - ACCP ACCP 2007 Stage IIIA3: Induction therapy followed by surgery is not recommended except as part of a clinical trial. Grade 1A Stage IIIB NSCLC as a result of N3 disease:treatment with neoadjuvant (induction) chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery is not recommended. Grade 1C Huber
Neoadjuvant Treatment - Germany • Stage I: outside of clinical trials not recommended (grade B). • Stage II: outside of clinical trials not recommended (grade B). • Stage III A: interdisciplinary individual decision in centres possible (grade B) German Society of Pneumology. Pneumologie 2010; 64, Supp.2: e1– e164 Huber
Standards for neoadjuvant treatment Thorough preoperative evaluation Interdisciplinary discussion 3 cycles of cisplatin plus „modern“ doublet No preoperative radiotherapy Efficacy is relevant Proper reevaluation, especially of the mediastinum Radiotherapy postoperatively if necessary Huber
Adjuvante Therapie des NSCLC Thank you for your attention München,17.9. 2008 Huber Huber