230 likes | 409 Views
Targeted and universal intervention. Leon Feinstein 18-July-2006. Five questions. How well can we identify those children at risk of adult social exclusion? Which measures are most predictive? What difference does it make? What are the implications for the delivery of services?
E N D
Targeted and universal intervention Leon Feinstein 18-July-2006
Five questions • How well can we identify those children at risk of adult social exclusion? • Which measures are most predictive? • What difference does it make? • What are the implications for the delivery of services? • What are the implications for the targeting of interventions?
E.g. Relationship of G1 maternal interest at G2 age 7 and G2-G3 parenting at G2 age 33
Relative cognitive shifts, 7 -11, by SES, 1958 Cohort Source: Feinstein, L. ‘Schools and Educational Attainment’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, (in press)
Skills and capabilities; Probability of being in workless household with children at age 30 Source: Feinstein, L. and Bynner, J. (Dec 2003), ‘The benefits of assets in childhood as protection against adult social exclusion: the relative effects of financial, human, social and psychological assets’, Note to HM Treasury.
Some cost-benefit notation • C(T+) = The social cost of the outcome (T=truth) • P(T+) = The unconditional probability of the outcome • P(D+)= The level of targeting of the intervention • C(D+)= The cost of the intervention • f= the effectiveness of the intervention; 0 ≤ f ≤ 1.
True and false positives P(TP) = P(D+ | T+) = A / (A+C) P(FP) = P(D+ | T-) = B / (B+D)
Costs and benefits • C(T-, D+) = The cost of a positive decision and hence intervention for those who would not experience the outcome (deadweight +stigmatisation costs) • C(T+, D-) = The cost of a negative decision and hence failure to intervene for those who would experience the outcome • B(T+, D+) = The net benefit of a positive decision and intervention for those who would experience the outcome (net of intervention and stigmatisation costs) • B(T-, D-) = The net benefit of a negative decision and absence of intervention for those who would not experience the outcome.
B(T+, D+) = P(D+, T+) * f * C(T+) – P(D+, T+) * C(D+) = P(TP) * P(T+) {f * C(T+) –C(D+) }
C(T-, D+) = P(D-, T+) * C(D+) = P(FP) * P(T-) * C(D+) Hence cost effectiveness requires: P(TP) > P(T-) * C(D+) P(FP) P(T+) { f * C(T+) –C(D+) }
Optimal point on the ROC curve S* = P(T-) * B(T-, D-) + C(T-, D+) P(T+) B(T+, D+) + C(T+, D-)
3. Preliminary discussion • Targeting depends on identification • Identification capabilities are very strong • So targeted intervention is possible, but: • Ethical issues • Stigmatisation • Need effective and appropriate intervention • Facilitated community engagement crucial • People move in and out of risk • Progressive universalism is essential • Role of schools and GPs?