160 likes | 285 Views
Objectives. Describe the disagreement over the Bank of the United States. Discuss the differing viewpoints on the balance of federal and state powers. Explain why South Carolina threatened to secede from the Union. Describe the economic crisis that began in 1837. Terms and People.
E N D
Objectives • Describe the disagreement over the Bank of the United States. • Discuss the differing viewpoints on the balance of federal and state powers. • Explain why South Carolina threatened to secede from the Union. • Describe the economic crisis that began in 1837.
Terms and People • nullification – an action by a state that cancels a federal law to which the state objects • Martin Van Buren – President of the United States who succeeded Andrew Jackson • William Henry Harrison – Whig candidate who defeated Van Buren in the 1840 presidential election
How did old issues take a new shape in the conflict over a national bank and tariff? The second Bank of the United States earned strong support from business people. Made loans to businesses Kept government money safe Issued a stable currency Created confidence in U.S. banks
However, many Americans disliked the Bank because it restricted loans made by state banks. This angered farmers and merchants who wanted to borrow money to buy land. Some blamed the bank for the 1819 financial crisis, when many people lost their farms.
The Bank’s most powerful enemy was Andrew Jackson. The Bank should be called “the Monster.” It favors the wealthy at the expense of ordinary people. Jackson vetoed a bill to renew the Bank’s charter. It ceased to exist in 1836.
Jackson’s victory over the Bank had both positive and negative effects. Positive It increased the power of the presidency. Negative It made it more difficult for Jackson’s successor to deal with the economic crisis that began in 1837. It showed that a President could face down powers in Congress.
Although he had popular support, the national press ridiculed President Jackson for his quick temper and steely will. They portrayed him as a king that trampled on rightsprotected by the Constitution.
Since the nation’s founding, Americans had debated over the balance of power between the states and the federal government. The Constitution gave the federal government many significant powers. The Tenth Amendment reserved rights for the states and the people. Federal Power State Power
In 1828, the debate over states’ rights reached a crisis level. Congress passed a law raising tariffs on iron, textiles, and other products. Southerners felt the law was unfair. It made them pay more for goods. Manufacturers in the North and some parts of the West supported the law. Vice President John C. Calhoun agreed with the Southerners. He argued that the states had the right of nullification.
Arguments for Nullification Arguments Against Nullification America was formed from an agreement between states. America was formed by the entire American people. Daniel Webster argued, “We are all agents of the same supreme power, the people.” States kept certain powers. States had the power to nullify unjust laws.
President Jackson and Vice President Calhoun became bitter enemies due to their opposing views on states’ rights and nullification. Calhoun resigned in 1832 and was replaced by Martin Van Buren.
The crisis erupted in 1832, when Congress passed another tariff law. Jackson said that the Union could not be dissolved. He put troops in South Carolina on alert. South Carolina voted to nullify the tariffs and threatened to secede.
A turning point in the crisis occurred when Congress passed two bills: • one bill lowered tariffs • the other bill authorized the collection of tariffs by force South Carolina repealed its tariff nullification. The crisis was settled, but the question of states’ rights remained.
When Martin Van Buren took office as President in 1837, he faced an economic crisis. Britain bought less cotton. Cotton prices fell. Cotton growers could not repay their loans. Hundreds of banks went bankrupt. This crisis, the Panic of 1837, lasted 6 years.
Van Buren ran for re-election in 1840 against Whig candidate William Henry Harrison. The Whigs ran a skillful campaign to appeal to ordinary voters. Harrison easily defeated Van Buren. The Age of Jackson was over.
Section Review QuickTake Quiz Know It, Show It Quiz