90 likes | 315 Views
Brain Drain in Argentina. Saturday, November 29, 2014 Larry Or Dan Bryce Risto.Karinen Dan LoVullo. Outline. Overview Context Analysis Recommendations. Overview. Definition : General: movement of highly trained personnel from one area to another
E N D
Brain Drain in Argentina Saturday, November 29, 2014 Larry Or Dan Bryce Risto.Karinen Dan LoVullo
Outline • Overview • Context • Analysis • Recommendations
Overview • Definition: • General: movement of highly trained personnel from one area to another • Specific: The emigration of highly educated workers from developing countries to developed countries / from poor countries to rich countries • Causes • Inadequate salaries • Unstable government and insecurity • High inflation and falling currencies • Lack of human rights • Corruption and lack of accountability • Limited educational opportunities (World Economic Forum, 2000)
Scope • Africa looses 70,000 scholars yearly1 • 60% of medical doctors trained in Ghana during the 80s have left2 • 4,316 skilled South Africans left in 20033 • India looses 100,000 professionals to the United States yearly, at an estimated annual cost of $2 billion4 • 6,000 left Argentina annually between 1995-2000, plus 250,000 more since then5 1Prof. Edward Ofori-Sarpong, Ghana 2Mutume, 2003 3Naidu, 2003 4UN Human Development Report, 2001 5Intl Herald Tribune
“Having lost its money, Argentina is now losing its minds.” (Nevaer, 2002) • 2002 Economic Collapse • “… in the first two months of this year [2002], 1,260 Argentine Jews moved to Israel …compared with 2001, when 1,300 Argentine Jews emigrated to Israel over the entire year • “Argentines with a[n] … immediate family member living in Spain or Italy can obtain visas to emigrate there” • “Recently, Argentina issued a desperate plea to the World Bank for an extension on $800 million loan”
Argentina: 19th century: “glorious century” → 20th century: “lost century” → 21st century: “?” • GDP: purchasing power parity: $403.8 billion (2002 est.), • Real growth rate: -10.9% (2002 est.) • GDP: composition by sector: agriculture: 5%, industry: 28%, services: 66% (2000 est.) • Inflation rate (consumer prices): 41% (2002, yearend) • Labor force: 15 million (1999), Unemployment rate: 21.5% (37377) • Industries: food processing, motor vehicles, consumer durables, textiles, chemicals and petrochemicals, printing, metallurgy, steel • Agriculture products: sunflower seeds, lemons, soybeans, grapes, corn, tobacco, peanuts, tea, wheat; livestock • Exports: $25.3 billion (2002), Exports commodities: edible oils, fuels and energy, cereals, feed, motor vehicles • Export partners: Brazil 23.6%, US 10.9%, Chile 9.7%, Spain 4.3% (2002) • Imports: $9 billion (2002), Import commodities: machinery and equipment, motor vehicles, chemicals, metal manufactures, plastics • Import partners: Brazil 42%, US 12.8%, Germany 4.4% (2002) • Debt external: $155 billion (2001 est.)
Analysis and prospects for the future STRENGTHS OPPORTUNITIES • Generally high rankings in human capital variables; highly literate, relatively well educated population, • Diversified industrial base • “Catching up”-hypothesis • Economy stabilizing after the crisis of 2001-02; growth, new governmental programs to attract hi-tech companies and investments • Large and knowledgeable ex-patriot scientific community; knowledge transfers (brain drain → brain circulation), government is developing “Intell/Scien Diaspora Network” • USA immigration policy after 9/11; decreasing brain drain or just redirecting it? WEAKNESSES THREATS • Scientific community unsatisfied – threshold for departing very low • Weak political institutions and corruption • Crisis of 2001-02 already destroyed the intellectual infrastructure? → insufficient “social capability” in order to “catch up”? • Generally very low rankings in economic variables; recurring economic problems of inflation, external debt, capital flight, and budget deficits, unemployment high • Foreign investment attracted mainly by protected domestic market • Problems in the national innovation system: poor incentive regimes, low R&D/GDP (and mainly carried out by public sector)
Convert to a floating currency valuation system. Stop borrowing from the IMF and private banks to support government spending. Continue privatization efforts and other pro-growth reforms. Reduce bureaucracy and endemic corruption. Increase investment in education at all levels. Generate a compensation scheme that encourages graduates to stay for at least a few years. Engage the large expatriate community of scientists in providing technical assistance in R&D infrastructure and market reforms. Recommendations Economic Reforms Science Policy Initiatives
References • Nevaer, Louis. “Brain Drain - Troubled Argentina Losing Its Minds.” Pacific News Service, May 15, 2002 • “Argentina: Economy.” <http://reference.allrefer.com/world/countries/argentina/economy.html> Mar 21, 2004. • Africa “brain drain”: 70,000 scholars leave yearly,” http://www.warmafrica.com/index/geo/1/cat/5/a/a/artid/208 • Gumisai Mutume, “Reversing Africa’s Brain Drain, Zambia Daily Mail,2003, http://www.queensu.ca/samp/Commentaries/2003/drain.htm • World Economic Forum, “Battling the emerging market brian-drain,” 2000, http://www.weforum.org/site/knowledgenavigator.nsf/Content/Battling%20the%20emerging%20market%20brain-drain_2000?open&topic_id= • U.N. Human Development Report 2001, http://hdr.undp.org/reports/global/2001/en/pdf/pr5.pdf • Edwin Naidu, “Figures show massive increase in brain drain,” 2003, http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?click_id=594&art_id=ct20040321104139440L152496&set_id=1 • “Expatriates return to Argentina,” International Herald Tribune Online, http://www.iht.com/articles/131302.html • Feldstein, Martin Argentina's Fall: Lessons from the Latest Financial Crisis Foreign Affairs Journal March/April 2002.