280 likes | 403 Views
Maritime Legislation on Oil Pollution Prevention and liability/Compensation. Presented by Capt. Deepak Kapoor – Nautical Surveyor , Directorate General of Shipping, Mumbai. TREND IN MAJOR OIL SPILLS. Collision in South Korea. Consequential action and claims. Part II.
E N D
Maritime Legislation on Oil Pollution Prevention and liability/Compensation Presented by Capt. Deepak Kapoor – Nautical Surveyor , Directorate General of Shipping, Mumbai
Part II International Obligations of Indian Administration
Status of conventions Instruments Entry States Age % W. Tonnage • UNCLOS 23.11.94 94 15 y ------ • IMO 17.03.58 168 51y 97.22% Prevention • MARPOL 02.10.83 149 55( 26)y 99.01 • Intervention 06.05.75 86 34y 74.40% Response • OPRC 13.05.95 97 14y 67.03% • Salvage 14.07.96 57 13y 47.16% • OPRC HNS 14.06.07 23 02y 30.88% Liability • CLC 30.05.96 121 40(13) y 96.39% • FUND 30.05.96 103 38(13) y 94.12% • HNS - 13 ----- 13.64% • Bunkers 21.11.08 37 05M 75.25% Legal • FAL 05.03.67 114 42y 90.31% • LLMC 01.12.86 52 23y 49.08%
Administrative Aspect of Oil Pollution in International Law Umbrella Convention • UNCLOS Article 207/208/209/210/211/212- adoption of laws for pollution from land based/sea bed activities/activities from area/dumping/vessels/from air • UNCLOS Article 221 -Measures to avoid pollution arising from maritime casualties- beyond TW Prevention • MARPOL 73/78- Parties to give full effect to the provisions of the convention • High Seas Intervention Article 1 - Measures to prevent, mitigate or eliminate grave & imminent danger to its coastline and other provisions Response • OPRC Article 1– individual or jointly to take measures • Article 9 of Salvage Convention- Rights of the Coastal States to protect its coastline Liability • CLC/FUND 92 conventions- State party has agreed to uniform international rules for determining liability and providing adequate compensation. • Bunker convention 2001- State party has agreed to uniform international rules for determining liability and providing adequate compensation for damage by bunker oil
MARPOL 73/78(Prevention) • Application- Types of Vessels • Construction- Tanks for residues • SBT/CBT/SLOP Tanks • Double Hull and Double Bottom • Pump room bottom protection • Limitation of size • COW arrangements • Pumping and discharge arrangement • OWF Equipment • Oil/water interface detector • Control of operational discharge • SOPEP • Oil Record Book • Reception Facilities • Sub division and damage stability • Survey and certification
High Sea Intervention (Prevention) • Consultation with other states and experts • Interim measures to protect lives and repatriation • Set up list of experts • Measures should be reasonable • Liability on the coastal state in case of damage to others • Conciliation • Arbitration • List of substances
OPRC (Response) • Oil pollution emergency plans • Oil pollution reporting procedures • Action on receiving an oil pollution report • National and regional systems for preparedness and response • International co-operation in pollution response • R&D Promotion • Technical Co-operation • Promotion of Bilateral/Multilateral Co-operation in Preparedness and response • Reimbursement of costs and assistance • Establishment of oil pollution combating equipment stockpiles • Development of training programme • Improving salvage services • Co-operation between states and insurers
Salvage Convention (Response) • Application judicial or arbitral proceedings • Platform/state owned vessels • Rights and remedies for public authorities • Duties of salvor ,owner and master • Rights of coastal states • Conditions for reward • Criteria for fixing reward (No cure and No Pay) • Special compensation (SCOPIC) • Salvage of persons • Claims and actions( 2years) • Common understanding on Article 13/14 • Amendment to York Antwerp Rules • Transmittal of text of laws to IMO
CLC/Bunker/HNS (Liability) • Applicability- up to EEZ • In case of ships carrying cargo as oil in bulk • Compulsory insurance by ships • Liability up to limit as per GRT • Constitution of FUND • Acceptance of certificates issued outside India • Ban on entry and leaving • Jurisdiction of courts
Reference Documents on Pollution Response and Claims (All 4) • Manual on Oil Pollution Edition- • Section I - Prevention • Section II - Contingency Planning • Section III - Salvage • Section IV - Combating Oil Spills • Section V - Administrative Aspects of Oil pollution Response • Section VI - IMO guidelines on samplings & identification of oil spills • Comprehensive manual on Port Reception facilities • Guidelines to ensure the adequacy of port waste reception facilities 2.Chemical Pollution • Problem Assessment and Response Arrangements • Search and Recovery of Packaged goods at Sea Claims settlement • IOPC claims Manual Edition
Part III Where do we stand now?
National Laws (All 4) Merchant Shipping Act 1958: • Section 356 C – Provisions of Prevention of Pollution • Section 356 I –Oil reception Facilities at ports Provisions for Containment for accidental pollution • Section 356 J - Power to give Notice to polluting ship • Section 356K – Power to take measures for preventing or containing oil pollution • Section 356L – Power to give directions to certain ships • Section 356M - Oil Pollution Cess • Part XA- Limitation Liability • Part XB-Civil Liability for oil pollution damage • Part XC International Oil pollution Compensation Fund Indian Coast Guard Act any notifications Indian Ports Act 1917 as amended Inland Vessels Act 1917 as amended
LIMITS OF LIABILITY (Non Tankers/Tankers) Legal Main Convention • LLMC 1976 – PERSONAL CLAIMS – 333 000/- SDR – 499 500/- USD. Above 70,000 GT above 21million SDR+ • PROPERTY CLAIMS – 167 000 SDR – 250 500 USD. Above 70,000GT above 10.9million SDR+ Protocol • LLMC 1996 – PERSONAL CLAIMS - 2000 < 2 Million SDR – 3.17 Million USD. Above 70,000GT above 48.4million SDR+ • PROPERTY CLAIMS – up to 2000GT-2million SDR. Above 70,000GT above 24.2million SDR+
LIMITS OF LIABILITY FOR ships carrying oil as Cargo in bulk (01st November 2003) Tier I • CLC 1969 – 3 Million TO 14 Million SDR (22 Million USD) • CLC 1992 – 59.7 (88 Million USD) TO 89.77 Million SDR – 89 142 Million USD Tier II • Fund 1971 – 60 Million SDR (95 Million USD) • Fund 1992 – 135 Million SDR (240 Million USD) – 203 Million SDR (321 Million USD). Tier III • S- Fund – 750 Million SDR (1186 Million USD). • STOPIA 2006 – 20 Million SDR (32 Million USD for tankers up to 2954 GRT) • TOPIA 2006 – indemnification 50%. Review: Between 2006 to 2016
Part IV– Ways of Improving By Bridging the Gap
OBSERVATIONS MADE AT CABINET SECRETARY MEETING ON 08TH DECEMBER’ 2003 ON SUBJECT ISSUE • No indigenous facilities for TIER III, Oil Spills • Operational & Functional Responsibilities rest with Coast Guard • Legal & Administrative responsibilities rest with DG Shipping • Risk exposure to Oil Spill likely to increase • Oil Spill Management requires operational & functional agency mandated to handle spills under overall supervision of Maritime Authority i.e. DG Shipping • A separate entity was not necessary
Decisions taken during the Meeting • Indigenous Tier III should be developed within coast guard • Coast Guard to function under the Ministry of Defence • R&D activities & requisite Science & Technology to be given by Oil Industry Safety Directorate • Legal & Administrative matters, the responsibility of Maritime Authority under DG Shipping • DG Shipping to function under the direction of Ministry of Shipping • Compressive Oil Spill Management Policy for India to be finalized at earliest
Threat to Indian Sub continent • Call by Region and Vessel Type Container 27228 8% Dry Bulk 16734 9%(16000) Gas 3695 9% (3000) GC 20036 4% (18,000) Passenger 1812 1% Ro Ro 7953 6% Miscellaneous 4494 4% Tanker 32923 11%(18000) 501 & 13 Live VLCC and ULCC 2.2billion oil trade/year(89% of total volume of global trade ,231miilion by pipeline and 17million by road /rail tankers
New Instruments • Review of rules for INTERVENTION HIGH SEAS Convention • Review of rules for OPRC Convention • Enact Bunker Convention and frame rules • Consider Ratification of Supplementary Fund – 2003 • Consider Ratification of LLMC 1996
Fill up Gaps Between various applicable Acts • Power of port to prohibit certain vessels • Rules for arrival/departures of vessels • Procedures for loading, discharge, ballast and wastes • Provisions for reception facilities • Contingency plans • Procedures for dealing with oil spills • Provisions for place of refuge • Right to seek compensation • Relationship between orts and others • Competent of port to deal with incident outside port • Power of port to detain • Audit of ports • Insurance against oil pollution and wreck removal • Provisions of cooperation between various authorities • Provisions for salvage services • Penalty provisions • Delegation of powers to CG
Summary • Legal framework for Oil Pollution & Liability to strengthen for facilitatation of foreign trade and achieving economic goals • Lays down and implements basic objectives of State (Preamble) • Good Rules or procedure for detention, denial of entry, banning departure or arrest with deterrent measures • Legal framework to regulate relationship with all parties