240 likes | 389 Views
Depression and work incapacity in Scotland: Evidence from the Scottish Health and British Household Panel Surveys. Matt Sutton Will Whittaker Health Methodology Research Group (matt.sutton@manchester.ac.uk). Background.
E N D
Depression and work incapacity in Scotland: Evidence from the Scottish Health and British Household Panel Surveys Matt Sutton Will Whittaker Health Methodology Research Group (matt.sutton@manchester.ac.uk)
Background • Part of a mixed-methods research project funded by the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health Directorate General • Research questions for survey analysis • Who is likely to transit to and from Incapacity Benefit? • Can the ‘at-risk’ individuals be identified in general practice? • Do practices influence work incapacity?
British Household Panel Survey • Longitudinal sample, with refreshment and booster samples • 17 waves of interviews (1991 – 2007) • Interviews in autumn • Current status • Experience since 1st September of previous year • Analysis of working-age population with interviews in consecutive years • Analysed years of exposure: • 32,130 inactive job status • 114,092 active job status • 7,964 on Incapacity Benefit
Analysis • Probability of transit: • From inactive job status to IB • From active job status to IB • Off of IB • Multivariate logistic regression with random-effects for individuals • Explanatory variables: • GHQ-12 score; Other health problems; Year; Ethnicity; Educational attainment; UK region; Marital status; Age; Gender; Children • Inactive status • Standard Occupational Classification; Employment sector
Conditional influence of other health conditions on transits
Can the ‘at-risk’ individuals be identified in general practice?
Identifying those at risk • Identify starting year of first spell of Incapacity Benefit claiming • N = 1,758 first spells • Calculate prevalence in preceding and proceeding years of: • GHQ Caseness • Frequent GP attendance (10+ per annum)
Scottish Health Surveys • Cross-sectional surveys in 1995, 1998 & 2003 • Subsequently linked to NHS administrative records, including registered general practice at time of survey • We analyse the working-age population, excluding early retired • Sample = 12,221 individuals registered with 948 general practices
Analysis • Multivariate logistic regression with random-effects for practices • Empty model and model with explanatory variables: • Year • Gender • Age category • Marital status • Educational achievement • Health region • Area deprivation quintile • Focus on proportion (and significance) of unexplained variance at practice level (rho)
Comparator variables • Female • Married and living with spouse • Longstanding illness - mental condition • GHQ Caseness • GP visit in last fortnight • Less than degree (or equivalent) educational attainment
Summary of findings • Increasing proportion of work incapacity attributable to mental health • Mental health significantly influences the probability of transition to and from IB – robust to other influences • Factors influencing the probability of transition to IB are similar for individuals with depression to those for the entire population • Increasing prevalence of GHQ Caseness in years leading up to start of IB spell – though frequent GP attendance increases more distinctly • Significant practice variation in prevalence of work incapacity • ..but this may reflect geographical concentrations of socioeconomic factors rather than variations in practice behaviour