1 / 22

2011 MN GISLIS PANEL DISCUSSION

LiDAR ACTIVITIES IN MINNESOTA. 2011 MN GISLIS PANEL DISCUSSION. THURSDAY, OCT 6, 2011. TIM LOESCH, MNDNR, tim.loesch@state.mn.us PETER JENKINS, MNDOT, peter.jenkins@state.mn.us RON WENCL, USGS, rwencl@usgs.gov LES EVERETT, UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA evere003@umn.edu

iokina
Download Presentation

2011 MN GISLIS PANEL DISCUSSION

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. LiDAR ACTIVITIES IN MINNESOTA 2011 MN GISLIS PANEL DISCUSSION THURSDAY, OCT 6, 2011

  2. TIM LOESCH, MNDNR, tim.loesch@state.mn.us PETER JENKINS, MNDOT, peter.jenkins@state.mn.us RON WENCL, USGS, rwencl@usgs.gov LES EVERETT, UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA evere003@umn.edu NANCY RADER, MN GEO, nancy.rader@state.mn.us SPEAKErs:

  3. TIM LOESCH, MNDNR STATEWIDE LiDAR COLLECTIntroDUCTIONSTATUS

  4. PETER JENKINS, MNDOT DATA VALIDATION & ACCURACY

  5. MINNESOTA ELEVATION COMMITTEE • The Committee’s position was to spend as much of the money on acquisition as possible • Independent accuracy validation was essential • How to accomplish this ? • The first project (SE Mn) was full of surveyors & engineers who were willing to help • In the SW Project it was mostly county engineers • So far in the Metro & Arrowhead it has been both • This has been a sample of the in-kind effort that we have seen from all levels of government

  6. SOUTHEAST MINNESOTA LIDAR PROJECT

  7. S.E. MINNESOTA LIDAR PROJECT HIGHEST & LOWEST ACCURACY

  8. S.W. MINNESOTA PROJECT HIGHEST & LOWEST ACCURACY

  9. CONCLUSIONS There is a consistent spread in the RMSE values between the SE and SW projects The methodology and personnel seem to have little influence in the accuracy results Terrain has only a small influence in the accuracy results The error budget in GPS is +/- 2.5 cm, which could explain most of what we see Regardless the consultants have consistently meet contract deliverable specifications

  10. Questions ??? Thank You Peter Jenkins, PLS, CFedS

  11. RON WENCL, USGS FEDERAL PERSPECTIVEINVENTORY RESULTSNATIONAL STANDARDS

  12. LES EVERETT, UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Conservation Applications of LiDARtraining LCCMR project

  13. Audience and Method • For Conservation Professionals who use GIS • Hands-on workshops in computer labs • Repeated at multiple locations in MN • In ArcGIS or Civil 3D (1 Module)

  14. Training Modules Basics of Using LiDAR Data Terrain Analysis Hydrologic Applications Engineering Wetland Mapping Forest and Ecological Applications

  15. Contacts Project Manager: Les Everett, UM Water Resources Center evere003@umn.edu Program Coordinator: Ann Lewandowski, UM Water Resources Center alewand@umn.edu Project Web Site: http://tsp.umn.edu/lidar

  16. SHELLY SENTYZ, MNDNR STATE LiDAR RESEARCH AND EDUCATION COMMITTEESPRING SURVEYWEB PORTALTRAINING

  17. STATE LiDAR RESEARCH AND EDUCATION COMMITTEE

  18. STATE LiDAR RESEARCH AND EDUCATION COMMITTEE

  19. Tim Loesch, MNDNR, tim.loesch@state.mn.us Ron Wencl, USGS, rwencl@usgs.gov Peter Jenkins, MnDOT, peter.jenkins@state.mn.us Shelly Sentyrz, MNDNR, shelly.sentyrz@state.mn.us Sean Vaughn, MNDNR, sean.vaughn@state.mn.us Les Everett, University of Minnesota, evere003@umn.edu http://www.mngeo.state.mn.us/chouse/elevation/index.html FOR MORE INFORMATION:

More Related