280 likes | 366 Views
06411 Mini Nucleating Bubble Engine. Steven Nathenson Joseph Pawelski Joaquin Pelaez Andrew Pionessa Brian Thomson. Project Overview. Project Description
E N D
06411 Mini Nucleating Bubble Engine Steven Nathenson Joseph Pawelski Joaquin Pelaez Andrew Pionessa Brian Thomson
Project Overview Project Description • Creation of a mini device (mm scale) that harnesses the energy from periodic vapor bubble formation (nucleation) in a fluid resulting from heating • Current research MEMS devices use a micro scale (mm) piezoelectric membrane to convert mechanical oscillations from bubble nucleation directly to electrical current. • Project focuses on the development of a slightly larger (mini) scale engine permitting greater experimental analysis capability in addition to implementation in applications requiring mechanical energy. • Periodic bubble nucleation is produced by a mini heater powered by a modulated power supply.
Needs Assessment • Design Objectives • Size limitations – 1 ft3 • Cost • mm scale • Regulate the heater via a control system • Battery or power supply operated • Standard sized battery • Voltage and amperage based upon the power requirements of heater • What type of fluid allows for the best bubble growth? • Create a light weight system • Successfully test device • Benchmark efficiency of engine • Bubble visualization with high speed camera • Develop Theoretical Model • System models
Technical Requirements • Performance Requirements • Mechanical oscillation greater than 5-10 Hz • Run time of 20 seconds or more • Functional Requirements • Bulk fluid temperature • Bubble growth surface • Yield the appropriate amount of bubbles from the heating surface • Minimize friction to • Increase efficiency • Accurate bubble model
Risk Assessment Major Project Risks • Engine parts could be too unique and small • May result in going over budget • May result in lack of time • The engine design may be to similar to current MEMS devices if a piston or piston like design is not utilized • Bubbles may be too small to move the piston a significant amount for testing
Concept Feasibility Weighted Average Analysis
Design Overview • Buoyant Piston Design • Expanding bubbles in the water cause piston to move • Piston-cylinder configurations • Simple to machine • One moving part • Movement of piston easily measured • Piston is buoyant • Seal is not crucial and may leak slightly • Friction is reduced
Detailed Design Material Selection • Piston Casing • Boroscilicate Glass (Pyrex) • Stock part at McMaster - Carr • Machining - glass department is able to cut • Piston Base • Glass Mica Ceramic – high temp • Machining - Mechanical engineering machine shop • Piston • Low Density Polyethylene (LDPE) • Less dense than water • Core center to promote floatation • Machining - Mechanical Engineering machine shop • Electrodes • Copper Wire - Stock item at McMaster-Carr • Heater Element • Option 1 • Platinum wire and soldered electrodes • Option 2 • Manufactured heating elements provided by Dr. Kandlikar
Piston Design • Piston Considerations • Max volume of piston given density of water & piston material • Obtain wall thickness • Obtain true piston volume given drill bit dimensions • Verify that the piston still floats at appropriate height
Budget $500 • Piston • Casing • Base • Heater • Electrical Controls
Theoretical Models Navier Stokes • Parallel Plates with Gravity • Upper plate is moving at a constant velocity • Pipe Flow with Gravity
Theoretical Models System Models • Factors taken into account • Two model types • Based upon geometrical relationships • Based directly off of the Navier-Stokes equations • 5 total models • Some neglected forces shown to be insignificant • Some include all forces of the system • Verification Model • Simplified version of the models
Theoretical Models Systems Model 1 • Second order approximation • Negligible forces are removed to simplify the systems model • Model is setup for a known water displacement • Model assumes that the water moves proportional to the l displacement of the bubble
xp B2 mp Piston B1 xw K1 B4 Water mw B3 Theoretical Models Systems Model 2 • First order approximation • Neglects the viscous shear force due to the air on the piston • Model assumes that the water moves proportional to the l displacement of the bubble
Theoretical Models Plot comparison from Simulink Models • Negligible factors in design considerations Figure 15: Piston acceleration
Additional Theoretical Analysis Bubble growth rate • Mikic’s equations • Experimentally determine with high speed camera
T ∞ = 25 C x qo” T s = 400 C Additional Theoretical Analysis • Heat Transfer • Transient heat conduction • Semi-infinite solid 10 ms
Electrical System Requirements Specifications • Supply pulse signal with adjustable amplitude, duty cycle, and frequency • Signal must be output continuously • 100, 72, and 60 W signal for 10, 20 and 30 ms pulse • Implement component protection as well as operator protection • Design for small load resistance (~0.5 Ω) • Flexible for different loads
Final Electrical Design (a) Single NMOS(b) Single PMOS(c) Combined Current for saturation condition
Testing Experimental Design • Accurate high speed video analysis • Precision scale • A high intensity light for maximum resolution • Equipment • Camera: Photron Ultima APX digital video • Lens: Nikon AF Micro NIKKOR 105mm 1:2.8 D with optional 2x magnification. • Light: 600 watt halogen continuous source • Fan: High CCM 24 volt • Scale: Stainless, + .01 mm • Camera mount: standard x-y mount • Base: optics table
Preliminary Test Conclusions Problems encountered during preliminary testing • More power is needed • Higher resistance heater • Ability to solder small scale – Micro-e department • Solder to withstand high temperatures • A more stable platform • Formal setup • These details will be worked out in Senior Design II by the senior design team
Demonstrations • Enlarged mock-up • MATLAB Simulations • Bubble growth • Piston movement