10 likes | 136 Views
S ystems Analysis Laboratory. Updated 25.10.2004. G R O U P D E C I S I O N M A K I N G A N D E L E C T R O N I C D E M O C R A C Y. decision conferencing in nuclear emergency management. searching for joint gains in multicriteria negotiations. mobile group support facility.
E N D
Systems Analysis Laboratory Updated 25.10.2004 G R O U P D E C I S I O N M A K I N G A N D E L E C T R O N I C D E M O C R A C Y decision conferencing in nuclear emergency management searching for joint gains in multicriteria negotiations mobile group support facility method of improving directions intensive facilitated decision workshops spontaneous decision conferencing planning of countermeasures in nuclear accidents individual use of advanced multi-criteria software interactive method for reaching efficient alternatives search of joint gains from a given initial alternative solution evolves through jointly improving directions internet opinions-online.com notebooks in a wireless LAN preference programming in group decision support platform for global participation, voting, surveys, and group decisions multi-criteria voting opinions-online – vote advanced version of opinions-online providing different voting rules intervals representing the ranges of preferences within the group a new way to a concensus process TED – towards electronic democracy european network for internet based complex decision support funded by the European Science Foundation TED objectives web-sites and selected publications The scenario focused workshops: www.evatech.hut.fi, www.riihi.hut.fi/stuk/. TED – Towards Electronic Democracy: http://infodoc.escet.urjc.es/ted/. A. Salo and R.P. Hämäläinen: Multicriteria decision analysis in group decision processes. In: D.M. Kilgour and C. Eden (eds.), Handbook of Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, New York, 2010.V. Brummer, A. Salo, J. Nissinen and J. Liesiö: A methodology for the identification of prospective collaboration networks in international R&D programs, International Journal of Technology Management, 2010.K. Sinkko, R.P. Hämäläinen and R. Hänninen: Experiences in methods to involve key players in planning protective actions in the case of a nuclear accident, Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 2004.H. Ehtamo and R.P. Hämäläinen: Interactive multiple-criteria methods for reaching pareto optimal agreements in negotiations, Group Decision and Negotiation, 2001.R.P. Hämäläinen, M.R.K. Lindstedt and K.Sinkko: Multi-attribute risk analysis in nuclear emergency management, Risk Analysis, 2000.R.P. Hämäläinen and O. Leikola: Spontaneous decision conferencing with top-level politicians, OR Insight, 1996.R.P. Hämäläinen and M. Pöyhönen: On-line group decision support by preference programming in traffic planning, Group Decision and Negotiation, 1996. R.P. Hämäläinen, A. Salo and K. Pöysti: Observations about consensus seeking in a multiple criteria environment, Proc. of HICSS-25, 1992. promote rational and participative approaches to societal decision making develop methods and software to enable decision analyses to be communicated, explored and built over the WWW