170 likes | 178 Views
This document provides an outline of the preliminary design and safety review for the injector/re-injection chicane for the .12GeV upgrade, including requirements, specifications, beam transport layouts, safety considerations, cost estimates, and risk assessment.
E N D
12GeV Upgrade - Beam Transport Injection, Linac, Extraction, & CorrectorsPreliminary Design and Safety Review Injector/Re-injection Chicane Michael Bevins May 17, 2007
Outline • Introduction & Scope • Requirements & Specifications • New/Modified Elements/Girder Count • Beam Transport Layouts • Safety Considerations • Cost Estimates • Risk Assessment • Summary
Introduction & Scope • To accommodate the new arc 10 line the injector line will need to be shifted over the transfer lines beginning 20.51m upbeam of the current position • Two existing quad girders will move over the transfer lines • Three girders already over the transfer lines will be shifted to suit the new optics design • Existing quad girders and diagnostics will be reused • Two new quad girders will be installed • The 45MeV spectrometer will need to be upgraded and relocated upbeam • Upgrades & final location TBD • 12GeV field strength requirements force us to replace the dipoles on the re-injection chicane girder with higher strength magnets • Songsheet level machine layouts will be presented along with cost estimates Injector & Reinjection
Requirements & Specifications • Alignment specs • Quads positioned to +/-0.5mm in x & y, +/- 1.0mm in z • Vacuum specs • Beam line partial pressure of hydrogen <10-6 torr • Total average pressure of all other constituents less than 5x10-7 torr • Fabrication, welding, cleaning & handling, and leak checking specs still apply • 22631-S-001 Fabrication of Ultra-High Vacuum Equipment • 22632-S-001 Cleaning and Handling of U.H.V. Components • 22633-S-001 Welding Specification For U.H.V. Components • 22634-S-001 Helium Leak Test For U.H.V. Components • Note an update and modernization of our vacuum specs is underway
New/Modified Elements/Girder Count • Preliminary - pending CASA review and more detailed vacuum study • Elements in red are part of I&C WBS
Beam Transport Layouts – Injector & Re-injection Injector and re-injection area
Beam Transport Layouts – Injector Line Current Configuration Existing injector line running under arc 8 Four Quad Girders (2 new, 2 rebuilt on short girders) BL dipole shifted 20.51m upbeam Shift quad girders upbeam with dipoles 12GeV Configuration VERY congested area • Documentation of existing stand positions & configuration is incomplete • Plan to work closely with alignment group to gather as-built machine configuration Arc 10 quad girder Arc 10 four meter dipoles Spectrometer shifted upbeam
Beam Transport Layouts – Injector Line Quad girders BL dipole Current Configuration BL dipole to replace DK (moved 20.51m upbeam) No change to this BL dipole or girder Shift existing girders Existing injector line girders relocated over transfer line 12GeV Configuration
Beam Transport Layouts – Injector Line Current Configuration No changes between dipoles 12GeV Configuration Modified re-injection chicane girder
Beam Transport Layouts – Re-injection Chicane • Re-injection chicane girder modifications • Replace dipoles with higher strength magnets • Use existing support stand • Modify plate to accommodate new magnets
Beam Transport Layouts – Selected Images Injector line quad girder Spectrometer line Arc 8 dipole View looking downbeam
Beam Transport Layouts – Selected Images Injector line girders over transfer lines
Safety Considerations • Personnel Training • Jlab & sub-contractor • Radiation • Designated areas for containment and radiation survey of material that will be removed from the tunnel • Material handling • Provide provisions for lifting • Electrical Hazards • Package and support electronics, power leads and terminal blocks to control electrical hazards
Cost Estimates –Injector/Re-Injection WBS Rollup WBS Elements I have covered today
Cost Estimates - Highlighted WBS Girders & Stands - Procurements
Risk Assessment • Technical - Low • Girders & Supports – very similar designs exist and are already proven • Alignment - same as existing machine • Procurement Schedule - Low • No long-lead items identified • Cost – Low • Good cost estimates for machined parts • Vendor & Jlab shop budgetary estimates
Summary • Preliminary injector and re-injection beam transport layouts and cost and installation estimates are complete based on present scope • We are in a good position to support our DOE External Project Reviews this summer • We will continue to work closely with our friends throughout the lab (safety, CASA, installation, vacuum, alignment, RadCon, I&C, magnet measurement, operations, procurement & facilities) as we move forward • Detailed design will be completed to support assembly and installation schedules • We look forward to comments & recommendations from the committee