80 likes | 94 Views
Training Module extra: The difference between Traditional urban transport planning and Sustainable Urban Transport Planning. Technical Training Workshop, Sofia, 4 May 2012 Presentation prepared by Frank Wefering and Sebastian Bührmann (both Rupprecht Consult) and Ivo Cré, Polis.
E N D
Training Module extra: The difference between Traditional urban transport planning and Sustainable Urban Transport Planning Technical Training Workshop, Sofia, 4 May 2012 Presentation prepared by Frank Wefering and Sebastian Bührmann (both Rupprecht Consult) and Ivo Cré, Polis
From the State of the Art report • Bulgaria features in the category of countries ‘which still have to adopt SUMP’ • Planning = planning of infrastructure • No knowledge about SUMP, no technical capacity, no political support
From the SoAR (II) • Barriers • Car orientation • Lack of knowledge and resources • Lack of defined responsibilities and priorities • No public pressure, no political commitment • No perceived added-value over conventional transport plans
SUMP - an effective tool to achieve your objectives • Older style transport planning • Which scheme do we want to build? • SUMP: • What do we want to achieve? • What’s the best way to achieve it? • Do we really need to build anything? • Who do we consult? • How do we measure impacts? • With SUMP – more likely to achieve what we want • SUMP gives reasons for actions – easier to defend
Group discussions • Force field analysis: what are barriers and drivers to make the arrows in the previous slide work?
Thank you for your attention! Frank Wefering and Sebastian Bührmann, Rupprecht Consult f.wefering@rupprecht-consult.eu, s.buehrmann@rupprecht-consult.eu +49-221-606055-13 and -14 Ivo Cré, icre@polisnetwork.eu www.mobilityplans.eu