120 likes | 272 Views
Updates on TT11. Christoph Hessler, Brennan Goddard, Malika Meddahi. New TT11 layout. PS2, new lattice, moved by 2 cell lengths. 2 more cells added in TT11 @ PS2 extraction location (+ 2x21m). SPS. TT10. PS2, fodo lattice, original position. PS2, new lattice, moved by 3 cell lengths. 33 m.
E N D
Updates on TT11 Christoph Hessler, Brennan Goddard, Malika Meddahi
New TT11 layout PS2, new lattice,moved by 2 cell lengths 2 more cells added in TT11 @ PS2 extraction location (+ 2x21m) SPS TT10 PS2, fodo lattice, original position PS2, new lattice,moved by 3 cell lengths 33 m TI 2
PS2 LSS for inj. / extr. Additional 2 cells To SPS H- injection p injection (TT10) Prim 2nd sec MTEBKT DuK InjK InjS MTEBK MS2 MS1 ES ExtK BD+1st sec Courtesy W. Bartmann
EE insertion –version 2 PS2 to SPS Additional 2 cells PS2 TT11 TT10 SPS Skew quads
PS2 to SPS E. Exchange Version 2
PS2 to SPS E. Exchange Version 2
Performance with emittance exchange version 2 • For CNGS beam at 50 GeV, with 0.1% dp/p, this dispersion mismatch causes en blowup of 0.5 mm in V plane (0.0 mm in H plane). • Already looks reasonable – and further optimisation certainly still possible Normalised emittances from PS2 to SPS for CNGS beam *assuming 0.5 mm en increase from other mismatch sources Source: Brennan Goddard for PS2 review May 08
EE insertions: version 3 PS2 to SPS Additional 2.5 cells PS2 TT11 TT10 SPS Skew quads
PS2 to SPS E. Exchange Version 3
PS2 to SPS E. Exchange Version 3 No dispersion mismatch
Performance with emittance exchange version 3 • No dispersion mismatch, no corresponding emittance blow-up! Normalised emittances from PS2 to SPS for CNGS beam *assuming 0.5 mm en increase from other mismatch sources
What’s next? • Check / correct new geometry • Check optics for other beam types • Aperture • Trajectory correction • Magnet specs