80 likes | 347 Views
The Swiss Experience in Returning Illicit Assets of PEPs. Viktor J. Vavricka Directorate of International Law Federal Department of Foreign Affairs viktor.vavricka@eda.admin.ch G8/OAS-Seminar Miami, May 2-5, 2006. Two Examples . Sani Abacha (Nigeria)
E N D
The Swiss Experience in Returning Illicit Assets of PEPs Viktor J. Vavricka Directorate of International Law Federal Department of Foreign Affairs viktor.vavricka@eda.admin.ch G8/OAS-Seminar Miami, May 2-5, 2006
Two Examples Sani Abacha (Nigeria) • November 2004: Nigerian commitment to use funds for education, health (HIV/AIDS) and basic infrastructure (national MDG strategy) • February 2005: Swiss Federal Tribunal to allow return of remaining USD 458 million • Coordination, stakeholders, negociations (and TKELA…) • September 2005: The Governments of Nigeria and Switzerland agreed on a transparent process to return the funds (win-win) • Agreement with the World Bank to proceed with a Public Expenditure Management and Financial Accountability Review (PEMFAR) • Civil society participation, funded by Swiss Government
Angola • 2002: Criminal proceedings in Geneva in connection with the restructuring of public Angolan debt towards the Russian Federation. • Bilateral tensions and negociations with Angolan Government regarding the use of possible funds • November 2003: preliminary agreement reached • December 2004: case closed in Geneva (no irregularities found in the settlement of the public debt)
Angola • Geneva judicial authorities agreed to lift blocking order on four accounts containing USD 21 million to enable the bilateral agreement to be implemented • Agreement: funds transfered to account with Swiss National Bank • Account holder: Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC) • Social and humanitarian program, joint implementation by executive secretariat • SDC pays overhead costs
Modalities for Disposition and Transfer • Transfer to an account of the victim state (no strings attached), • Transfer to an account of the victim state, monitoring by recipient state or a third party • Transfer to an institution which uses the funds in favour of the victim State (transfer via a third party, e.g. debt reduction, country specific trust fund) • Transfer to an institution which uses the funds in favour of the population of the victim state • Transfer to the returning country's development cooperation or humanitarian projects in favour of the population of the victim State • No transfer at all.
Elements of Swiss Policy • Fundamental interest that assets of criminal origin are not invested in CH • Comprehensive range of legal and institutional measures to protect financial center against inflow of illegal assets • If assets of criminal origin find their way into CH, CH wants to return them quickly to the country of origin • Banking secrecy: does not protect criminals • Coherent measures at international level, need for cooperation between financial centers • G8 Disposition Paper
G8 Disposition Paper • Transparency and accountability in the transfer and administration of returned assets • Presumption of transfer to the benefit of the people harmed • Case-specific treatment • Encourage UNCAC principles • Consistency and coordination • Use of an agreement • Principles are fully in line with the Swiss experience
Thank you Viktor J. Vavricka Directorate of International Law Federal Department of Foreign Affairs G8/OAS-Seminar Miami, May 2-5, 2006