1 / 13

Content Rationale What is MI.World? Criteria for Projects Desired Outcomes Results

Content Rationale What is MI.World? Criteria for Projects Desired Outcomes Results. ** MAKING CONNECTIONS **. RATIONALE: Equip students with a global perspective Provide authentic learning opportunities for intellectual dialogue and inter-cultural understanding

ita
Download Presentation

Content Rationale What is MI.World? Criteria for Projects Desired Outcomes Results

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Content • Rationale • What is MI.World? • Criteria for Projects • Desired Outcomes • Results

  2. ** MAKING CONNECTIONS ** • RATIONALE: • Equip students with a global perspective • Provide authentic learning opportunities for intellectual dialogue and inter-cultural understanding • Build a network of peers across geographical boundaries

  3. Alignment and Integration • 2 of our Strat Thrusts  imparting enduring skills and to develop global citizens • Customised Learning in Curriculum  Knowledge, skills and values • Comprises of IP and Non-IP projects • Broadly categorised into Overseas Service Learning and Borderless Learning

  4. Approach • Approach is 2 pronged  Reaching out and bringing in

  5. Approach

  6. Criteria for Projects • An on-going collaborative project must be in place either before or after the trip • Substantial amount of time spent in schools and host homes • Projects must be sustainable for at least 2 years • Plans for sharing to showcase what has been learnt

  7. Desired Outcomes

  8. Results • Collaboration

  9. Results • In 3 years, a total of 36 MI.World trips were organised: • 2008 – 12 trips • 2009 – 7 trips (H1N1 outbreak) • 2010 – 17 trips proposed

  10. Culmination of the MI.World Programme • MI.WORLD CONFERENCE 2010 • (23 April – 8 May)

  11. Parting remarks • “It was very meaningful to foster friendship…we are given the chance to exchange views…we are able to broaden our outlook on the world and how it functions, and how it affects us as a human being” • Muhd Fikri Bin Iskandar Shah (Humanities, Overseas Educational Fieldtrip and Exchange programme, 2009, Kumamoto, Japan)

  12. Parting remarks • “We have learnt values from people that we’ve met, values which otherwise would be difficult for us to realize here in Singapore. • Now, I can really see why I should treasure all that I have. Though I’ve been told time and again, it is only through the trip I can truly see that I am taking things for granted. Simply hearing about it can never beat the experience in itself. It’s easy to forget, so I hope I can remember how I feel right now… forever.” Lee Ke Wei (Overseas CIP Trip, 2009, Bintan, Indonesia)

  13. MI.WORLD CONFERENCE 2010 (23 April – 8 May)

More Related