1 / 15

January 12th, 2011 Brussels

January 12th, 2011 Brussels. French studies on tobacco plain packaging Dr Karine Gallopel-Morvan, PhD University of Rennes 1, France. Toxic products…. Tobacco products…. …ARE TOXIC: 500 000 (Europe) 5 millions (world).

jabari
Download Presentation

January 12th, 2011 Brussels

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. January 12th, 2011Brussels French studies on tobacco plain packaging Dr Karine Gallopel-Morvan, PhD University of Rennes 1, France

  2. Toxic products…

  3. Tobacco products… …ARE TOXIC: • 500 000 (Europe) • 5 millions (world)

  4. Plain packaging (& visual warnings), an opportunity to break the impact of packaging Camel 20 cigarettes Marlboro 20 cigarettes Article 11

  5. French research aim To assess the impact of : • Plain packaging vs current packaging • Pictorial vs textual warnings …on attractiveness of the pack and smoking intentions

  6. 1- Qualitative research – 6 focus groups50 people (smokers & non smokers) • familiar brand and object • reminds Marlboro advertising in general • attractive color (red) • …

  7. not attractive, dull, sad, cold • evoke death, ash, smoke • look like a toxic product • don’t want to touch it & to buy it • …

  8. 2- Quantitative study (905 people) Marlboro pack Grey plain pack White plain pack Textual warnings 151 individuals 150 individuals 149 individuals Textual + pictorial warnings 153 individuals 151 individuals 151 individuals

  9. Effect of pack design & warnings on the attractiveness of the pack (stylish, fashion accessory, beautiful) Pack effect: F=73.71; p<.001 Warning effect: F=43.92 ; p<.001 text text and pictorial Mean (out of 5)

  10. Effect of pack design & warnings on motivation to purchase the pack Pack effect: F=44.94; p<.001 Warning effect: F=16.56; p<.001 text text and pictorial Mean (out of 5)

  11. Effect of pack design & warnings for convincing non smokers not to start smoking (non smokers only) Pack effect: F=9.6p=.002 text text and pictorial Mean (out of 5)

  12. Effect of pack design & warnings for convincing smokers to quit smoking (smokers only) Warning effect: F=34.87; p<.001 text text and pictorial Mean (out of 5)

  13. Effect of pack design & warnings on the desire to take a cigarette from the pack (smokers only) Pack effect: F=17.26 ; p<.001 Warning effect: F=28.85; p<.001 text text and pictorial Mean (out of 5)

  14. In summary: • Tobacco packaging is a powerful advertising tool • Plain packaging (& pictorial warnings) can undermine this advertising function

  15. THANK YOU FOR LISTENING.karine.gallopel@univ-rennes1.fr Acknowlegments INCa / MILDT / INSERM (funding 06/2D07080192-3/LL-LC)

More Related