330 likes | 654 Views
Presentation Overview. The case for actionClimate change, emission reductions and energy benefitsIncreasing waste generationStagnant recycling ratesPlanning for a sustainable future (2010 and Beyond)Texas focused resources. The Case for Action. Alarming climate change trendsLong term rising fuel prices and national security concerns over dependence on foreign oil Multiple opportunities for reducing GHG emissions and fuel use through changing solid waste management and production/ consump24
E N D
1. Solid Waste Management Beyond 2010: Planning for a Sustainable Future South Texas Resource Recovery Roundtable Conference
2. Presentation Overview The case for action
Climate change, emission reductions and energy benefits
Increasing waste generation
Stagnant recycling rates
Planning for a sustainable future (2010 and Beyond)
Texas focused resources
3. The Case for Action Alarming climate change trends
Long term rising fuel prices and national security concerns over dependence on foreign oil
Multiple opportunities for reducing GHG emissions and fuel use through changing solid waste management and production/ consumption practices Climate Change is really happening
Fuel prices are rising over the long term
Dependence on Foreign oil creates national security concerns
GHG emissions and energy useClimate Change is really happening
Fuel prices are rising over the long term
Dependence on Foreign oil creates national security concerns
GHG emissions and energy use
4. Emission Reduction Benefits Upstream
Reduced CO2 emissions from energy use in material acquisition and manufacturing stages
Increased carbon storage in soils when organics are composted and applied to the soil
Downstream
Avoided landfill methane emissions
Avoided CO2 emissions from combustion
Source: EPA Region 4
5. Energy Benefits Decreased demand for raw materials
Less energy consumed with raw materials extraction
Less energy needed for manufacturing and transportation
Energy produced from landfill gas, WTE & emerging technologies
Source: EPA Region 4
6. U.S. MSW Generation Trends
7. U.S. MSW Generation Trends
8. Declining Recycling RatesExample: Oregon 2006: Total waste generation reached record high 5.75 million tons – 3.9% increase from 2005
Slight decrease seen in 2007, but still substantially higher than 2005 and all previous years
2007: 46.7% recovery rate - down from 47.5% in 2006
“Rising solid waste generation is keeping the State’s recycling rate from growing.”
9. Declining Recycling RatesExample: Maine 13-year trend of increased recycling (in tons)
Decreased from 42% in 1997 to 35% in 2007
“The growth in waste generation prevents the recycling rate from increasing despite greater tonnages being recycled…Our recycling rate cannot keep pace with waste generation.”
Source: Maine State Planning Office
10. Declining Recycling RatesExample: Florida From 2002 to 2006:
MSW (burned, buried or recycled) has increased from 1.76 to 1.91 tons/capita/year
Recycling rate decreased over 4% - from 28% down to 24%
“Florida communities are seeing declining recycling rates in spite of recycling program expansions.”
11. Our Consumer Culture Waste generation is directly related to consumer behavior
Roughly half of U.S.-related GHG emissions are associated with production and transportation of goods (US EPA)
Sustainable consumption must be promoted to reduce waste and GHG emissions.
12. Consequences of Non Action Solid waste generation rate likely to rise again as economy improves
Waste generation may continue to outpace recycling and composting
Majority of all “waste” generated will still need to be landfilled
Natural resource depletion continues world wide
13. Planning for a Sustainable Future (2010 and Beyond) Re-define vision and goals
Re-structure roles
Key solid waste strategies for 2010 (and beyond)
Goals - tie vision and goals to broader established environmental and economic goals
emphasize opportunities through the stimulus more
Goals - tie vision and goals to broader established environmental and economic goals
emphasize opportunities through the stimulus more
14. 1. Re-define Vision and Goals: Resource vs. Waste Management Example - Connecticut’s vision:
Transform system into one based on resource management and collective responsibility
Shift from a throwaway society towards system that reduces generation and toxicity of trash and treats wastes as valuable resources
Manage wastes through a holistic and comprehensive approach, resulting in resource conservation, less waste and pollution, and supply of valuable raw materials Transform system into one based on resource management through collective responsibility for production, use, and end-of- life management of products and materials in the state
Shift from a throwaway society towards system that reduces generation and toxicity of trash and treats wastes as valuable raw materials and energy resources, rather than as useless garbage or trash
Manage wastes through holistic and comprehensive approach, resulting in conservation of natural resources and creation of less waste and pollution, while supplying valuable raw materials to boost manufacturing economies
Transform system into one based on resource management through collective responsibility for production, use, and end-of- life management of products and materials in the state
Shift from a throwaway society towards system that reduces generation and toxicity of trash and treats wastes as valuable raw materials and energy resources, rather than as useless garbage or trash
Manage wastes through holistic and comprehensive approach, resulting in conservation of natural resources and creation of less waste and pollution, while supplying valuable raw materials to boost manufacturing economies
16. 1. Re-define Vision and Goals: Aim for Zero Waste
17. 2. Re-Structure and Re-define Roles: Integrate with Environmental/ Sustainability Programs CIWMB - reorganized non-regulatory activities (over 250 staff) into new Sustainability Program
Massachusetts - created 16-agency coordinating council to run state sustainability program addressing defined environmental priorities in integrated fashion
City of El Paso – developed citywide sustainability plan, coordinated at a citywide level
18. 2. Re-Structure and Re-define Roles: Use Partnership Based Approach Leverage public and private sector resources
Identify barriers to realizing opportunities
Bring together the right stakeholders to overcome these barriers
State of California working with private companies to develop new markets for used tires. Responsibilities are broader than waste managed directly: also to be addressed is role of citizens and businesses as producers and generatorsResponsibilities are broader than waste managed directly: also to be addressed is role of citizens and businesses as producers and generators
19. 3. Key Solid Waste Strategies for 2010 and Beyond Best management practices (BMPs) for solid waste management
Infrastructure and market development
EPP procurement and leading by example
Policies/regulation
Financing
20. BMPs – Upstream and Recovery Education/outreach - social marketing to achieve behavior change – promotion of sustainable consumption; critical to ensure existing programs provide maximum return
Reuse and recycling - as convenient as waste disposal
C&D debris – waste prevention and on site recovery, followed by central processing
Composting – food waste plus yard debris (then reduce waste collection)
Recycling and compost market development - to feed local, regional and global economies There is a shift in focus to promoting use of best practices as opposed to measuring attainment of numeric goals.
There is a shift in focus to promoting use of best practices as opposed to measuring attainment of numeric goals.
21. Collection of Three Streams
26. BMPs - Disposal with Recovery In Mind Integration of materials recovery in transfer stations and disposal sites
Preprocessing of waste prior to landfill/WTE
Bioreactor landfills
Methane recovery from landfills
28. Infrastructure and Market Development Help optimize recovery and processing infrastructure by promoting regionalization
MRFs developed to operate regionally
RE: market development, employ:
General (cross-material) strategies
Material-specific strategies
Aimed at overcoming market inefficiencies and barriers
29. EPP and Leading by Example: Design & Run Green Facilities and Operations
LEED/green buildings and facilities construction
EPP procurement for furniture, supplies, and equipment
Operation and maintenance to minimize waste (e.g., in house programs for waste prevention, recycling, and composting)
30. Policies/Regulation Disposal bans
Mandatory recycling
Building codes and permitting requirements
Product stewardship
Many policy initiatives are low cost to government. NCTCOG developed recycling ordinance guidelines.
31. Example: Product Stewardship in Ontario Ontario law mandates that "Stewards" of residential "Blue Box Waste" fund 50% of net cost of Ontario's municipal recycling programs
2008 fees: $66,524,000. 80% allocated to municipalities; 20% for continuous improvement fund
Additional $2.4 million from stewards of plastics to aggressively increase Blue Box plastics recycling
Similar industry-funded programs developed for municipal hazardous and electronic waste
Growing expectation that EPR legislation in the United States is a matter of when, not if.
32. Financing (Direct and Indirect) Full cost accounting - identify true costs
Re-design of program financing to eliminate dependence on waste for income
Incentives to achieve higher waste reduction and diversion rates
Pay-as-You-Throw (PAYT)
Raising cost of disposal to increase waste reduction and recycling
Emissions reduction credit systems (Cap and Trade)
Eliminate subsidies that favor use of virgin materials and generation of waste
Product stewardship
Economic stimulus funds Economic stimulus funds – a source of funding for state programs.
Economic stimulus funds – a source of funding for state programs.
33. Texas Focused Resources Houston-Galveston Area Council
Recycling 101 and 102 workshops
Transfer Station Best Management Practices Workshop
Organic Waste Best Management Practices Workshop
North Central Texas COG
C&D Waste Minimization Strategies Study
C&D MRF Feasibility Study
Regional Recycling Rate Benchmarking Study
Recycling Contract Negotiation Guidebook
Recycling Ordinances and Building Design Guidelines
Capital Area Planning COG
Market Analysis of Recovered Materials
34. Scott Pasternak, Senior Director
R.W. Beck, Inc.
Austin, Texas
Telephone: 512-651-6405
E-mail: spasternak@rwbeck.com
www.rwbeck.com