E N D
1. 1 Technology Transfer: theNIH Experience Mark Rohrbaugh, Ph.D., J.D.
Director
Richard Rodriguez, M.B.A.
Director, Division of Technology Development & Transfer
Office of Technology Transfer
National Institutes of Health
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
Technology Transfer Tactics Webinar
December 8, 2009
2. 2 Overview NIH/OTT
Collaborations
Success stories
Patenting & Licensing
Marketing resources
Monitoring & enforcement
Q & A
3. 3 The National Institutes of Health27 Institutes and Centers
4. 4 Extramural Research Long tradition of interaction between Government, Academia, and Industry
Over 80% of the NIH budget
Over 50,000 awards annually
325,000 extramural researchers (mostly universities)
Over 3,000 research organizations
5. 5 Intramural Research Approximately 9% of NIH Budget
More than 2,000 active projects
More than 6,000 doctoral level scientists
Breakthrough Technologies/Therapies
6. 6 NIH Collaborations Negotiated by NIH Institutes
Cooperative research and development agreements (CRADA)
Material transfer agreements (MTA)
Clinical trial agreements (CTA)
Negotiated by OTT
Non-exclusive/exclusive licenses
Internal and commercial uses
Patented and unpatented IP
7. 7 Cooperative Research and Development Agreements (CRADAs) Agreement envisions two-way exchange of resources, information and intellectual property
Collaboration between Government lab and outside party
Government provides expertise, equipment, materials (no money)
Collaborator provides same and possibly money
8. 8 CRADAs cont. CRADAs cannot direct or restrict research in a NIH laboratory
Brief delays in dissemination of research results are permitted
Subject inventions created under CRADA can be solely owned by either party or jointly owned
Option for non-exclusive or exclusive license
CRADA research plan
Government retains use license
9. 9
10. Examples of Products Developed Under NIH CRADAs
11. FY08 PRODUCTS253 total
12. 12 Centralized Technology Transfer
13. 13 Decentralized Technology Transfer
14. 14 Patentability Issues Contract law firms
Public disclosures
Coordination with NIH institutes
Large vs. small institutes
Collaborations
Information flow
IP database
15. 15 Patent Policy Seek patent protection if:
Realize the technology’s primary use
Preventive, diagnostic, therapeutic
Commercial or public health value
Practical utility
Do not seek patent protection if:
Technology transfer can best be accomplished without patent protection
16. 16 Organizational Structure
17. 17 Licensing Goals Promote public health
Bench to bedside: product development
Aggressively market technology
Identify “best” commercial partner
Negotiate appropriate agreement
Support programmatic goals
Economic development
18. 18 NIH Licensing Principles Preference for non or partial exclusivity
Promote competition and access
~15% exclusive agreements
Detailed Commercial Development Plan
No defensive licenses
Grant only the appropriate scope of rights
Define product
Specific fields of use
Licensed territory becoming more important
19. 19 License Principles cont. Permit research uses
Exclusive agreements
Academic or corporate
Enforceable benchmarks
Monitor agreements (at least annual)
20. 20 FY09 License Data 375 applications received (~400/yr)
215 licenses executed
44% small business vs. 38% large business
82% US firms
NIH does license to foreign firms
21. 21 Global License Data(1987-2009) 1,400+ active licenses
More than 400 products (including research tools) on the market
25 FDA approved
84 more in in clinical development
$950M in royalties collected
$5-6B annually in products sales by companies
22. 22 Large vs. Small Firms Types of agreements
Size does matter
Large firms more willing to walk away
Small firms cash-strapped
Momentum
Efficiency
At the end of the day…
23. 23 US vs. Non-US Firms Getting the message out there
Best partner is key goal
All things being equal
Special provisions/requirements
US manufacturing provisions
Share model agreements early
24. 24 Licensing Keys to Success State clear goals
Communicate early and often
Internal organizational structure
Buy-in from stakeholders
Be flexible/current events
Database and management controls
25. 25 NIH Marketing Efforts OTT Product Showcase
http://www.ott.nih.gov/productshowcase/
OTT Licensing Opportunities
OTT Searchable database
http://www.ott.nih.gov/Technologies/AbsSearchBox.aspx
Federal Register
http://www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/advanced.html
NIH Listserve
http://www.ott.nih.gov/ott_listserv/join_ott.aspx
26. 26 Specialized Marketing Efforts
Synapse™: Technology matching tool
Contact Ajoy Prabhu: aprabhu@mail.nih.gov
Pipeline to Partnerships (P2P): virtual space to showcase technology and product development
http://www.ott.nih.gov/p2p
Rare Diseases and Conditions Page: technologies related to rare diseases or conditions
http://www.ott.nih.gov/rarediseases
27. 27 Monitoring & Enforcement
28. 28 What is It Reviewing licenses & identifying obligations
Collecting overdue royalty payments
Reviewing reports – progress, annual, sales
Addressing other non-compliance issues
Settling license disputes
Performing/managing royalty audits
Identifying and settling patent infringements
29. 29 Why Do It? Verify that PHS technology is used or developed
Verify that royalties owed are paid
Identify unlicensed technology users
Increase overall royalties collected
Assure licensees are treated fairly
Assure inventors are treated fairly
Assure license records are up-to-date
30. 30 Options for Compliance Inform/educate licensee of their obligation(s)
Set deadlines for receipt of royalties/reports owed
Threaten or impose “additional royalties”
Suspend other licensing until owed royalties are paid
Threaten with debt collection, credit bureau reporting, & excluded parties listing
Negotiate amendment to restore compliance/settle dispute
Notice of license termination
31. 31 Other Monitoring Functions Evaluate requests for consent to sublicense
Evaluate requests for consent to assign license
Evaluate requests for waiver of U.S. mfr requirement
Negotiate amendments – term extension & other
Identify licenses for audit, manage audit, negotiate settlement
Investigate infringement cases, pursue licensing
32. 32 Resources Used in Monitoring TechTracS Database
Communication with licensee (phone / e-mail / letter)
Reports submitted by licensees
Press releases, information on company web sites, SEC filings, etc.
Information provided by licensees or inventors
Legal advice from NIH Office of General Counsel
U.S. Attorney’s Office located near licensee
33. 33 Impact of Monitoring Efforts Total FY2008 Royalty Collections for NIH = $92 million
Monitoring & Enforcement efforts brought in :
$1.5 million in collection of overdue royalties
$396,206 from new agreements & settlements
$40,838 from 3rd party audits
= $1.95 million (2.1% of total FY08 royalties)
34. 34 Thanks&Q&A