360 likes | 515 Views
Antiretroviral Drug Resistance. Anna Maria Geretti UCL Medical School & Royal Free Hampstead Medical School, London. Host-related factors Adherence Tolerability Immunity Genetics. Drug-related factors Potency PK properties Genetic barrier. Virus-related factors Viral load
E N D
Antiretroviral Drug Resistance Anna Maria Geretti UCL Medical School & Royal Free Hampstead Medical School, London
Host-related factors • Adherence • Tolerability • Immunity • Genetics • Drug-related factors • Potency • PK properties • Genetic barrier • Virus-related factors • Viral load • Drug susceptibility • Fitness Persistent virus replication during HAART Drug pressure Emergence and evolution of drug resistance
Attachment Fusion Release of RNA Assembly Reverse transcription Integration Transcription Maturation and budding
Characteristics of HIV-1 infection High virus replication rate (109-1010 virus particles / day) Rapid virus clearance (T½ cells producing virus: <1 day; T½ free virus in plasma: a few hrs) Virus latency (1:106 resting CD4 T cells) Chronic immune activation and inflammation CD4 T-cell depletion (108-109 cells lost daily) Progressive immune deficient state Continuous virus genetic evolution Wong 1997; Chun 1997; Siliciano 2003; Strain 2003; Han 2007
Mechanisms of HIV genetic evolution • RT-driven mutagenesis • Rate: ~1 wrong incorporation per genome round • All possible point mutations generated daily 2. APOBEC-driven mutagenesis • Deamination of cytosine residues in nascent DNA • GA hypermutation 3. Recombination • Rate: 7-30 per genome round • Hybrid virus progeny produced from different strains
Dominant quasispecies Escape from pressure Preserved fitness • rapid turnover • rapid adaptation
Consequences of HIV genetic variability • At the population level • Continuous emergence of new variants • At the patient level • Escape from immune pressure • Escape from drug pressure • Increased fitness and pathogenicity • Challenge for diagnostic and monitoring assays
Emergence Evolution Single mutant Double mutant Triple mutant Emergence and evolution of resistance • Increasing number of mutations • Accumulation of mutations on the same viral genome • Initially reduced viral fitness • Compensatory changes restore fitness
Key principles of resistance • Drug-resistant mutants are selected (not created) by drug pressure if virological suppression is incomplete • Ongoing virus replication under drug pressure leads to the evolutionof resistance and cross-resistance • Resistant mutants often display reduced fitness but compensatory changes emerge over time that partially restore virus fitness
PCR Viral gene (e.g., RT) HIV RNA Plasma Mutations RT M184V Methionine Valine @ codon 184 of RT ATG / AUG GTG / GUG Sequencing
100 Detected by routine methods 10 Detected by ultrasensitive methods 1 Mutation Frequency 0.1 0.01 Natural background 0.001 Detection of resistant mutants
Low-frequency resistance in the FIRST study N=258 • Risk of failure of first-line NNRTI-based ART in patients with NNRTI resistance • Bulk resistance: HR 12.4 [3.4-45.1] • UDS resistance: HR 2.5 [1.2-5.4] USD = Ultra deep sequencing Siemen, JID 2009
Resistant Wild-type Drug pressure Limit of detection 20-30%
Key principles of resistance • Once drug pressure is removed, resistant mutants are outgrown by fitter wild-type virus and become undetectable by routine tests • Resistance test results obtained after therapy is discontinued are not reliable • Resistant mutants persist at low frequency in plasma and are “archived” in latently infected cells • Resistance is long-lasting • Resistance test results must be interpreted in the context of the patient’s treatment history
Ms S., 35 yr Δ HIV+ Dec 1997 Resistant Wild-type d4T 3TC NVP d4T 3TC NVP VL M184V M184V Y181C Y181C <50 M184V = 3TC, FTC Y181C = NNRTIs
Transmission Drug pressure Transmitted drug resistance Stable after transmission Gradual reversion over time, sometimes incomplete Persistence at low frequency in plasma Persistence in latently infected cells
Key concepts Genetic barrier
Genetic barrier to resistance Resistant Wild-type Defined by: Number of mutations required to compromise activity Impact of each mutation on drug susceptibility Interactions between mutations Fitness cost of resistance Drug concentration
Common NRTI resistance patterns TAMs = thymidine analogue mutations: M41L, D67N, K70R, L210W, T215Y/F, L219Q/E
Resistance with first-line HAART Margot, HIV Med 2006; Margot, JAIDS 2009; Moyle, JAIDS 2005; Molina, IAC 2004; Gathe, AIDS 2004; Mills, AIDS 2009; Lennox, Lamcet 2009.
1st and 2nd generation NNRTIs Nevirapine Efavirenz Etravirine Major resistance mutations L100I, K101E/P K103N/S V106A/M E138K, V179F Y181C/I/V, Y188L/H/C, G190A/S/E F227C, M230L, K238T Rilpivirine
Patients with VL <50 copies/ml at wk 48 (ITT-TLOVR) Activity of ETV with a strong backbone DUET studies: OBR (with DRV/r) + ETV or Placebo 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 ETV + OBR (n=599) Placebo + OBR (n=604) 61% Responders (%) ± 95% CI 40% p<0.0001* 0 2 4 8 12 16 20 24 32 40 48 Time (weeks) ART-experienced patients with documented NNRTI and PI resistance Katlama, AIDS 2009
Activity of ETV with a weak backboneStudy TMC125-C227: 2 NRTIs + ETV or PI ART-experienced, PI-naive patients with documented NNRTI resistance Ruxrungtham, HIV Med 2008
DRV (R41T, K70E) TPV (L33V, M46L, V82T) ATV (L10F, V32I, M46I, I62V, A71V, I84V, N88S) LPV (L10F, L23I, M46I, I50V, I54V, L63P, V82A) APV (L10F, V32I, L33F, M46I, I47V, I50V) NFV (L10F, D30N, R41K, K45I, M46I, V77I, I84V, N88D) SQV (G48V, A71V, G73S, I84V, L90M) RTV (G16E, M46I, V82F, I84V) The genetic barrier of PIs in vitro 450 400 350 300 Increase in PI selection concentration 250 200 150 100 50 0 0 100 300 500 700 900 1100 Time (days) De Meyer, Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005; De Meyer, IHDRW 2006
Key concepts Hypersusceptibility
P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P Mechanisms of NRTI resistance: Primer unblocking • T215Y-mediated resistance • Hydrolytic removal of the chain-terminating NRTI enables DNA synthesis to resume • The pyrophosphate donor in most cells is ATP • M184V antagonizes the process • 3TC partially restores susceptibility to ZDV,d4T and TDF in the presence of TAMs • 3TC antagonizes the emergence of TAMs Gotte, J Virol 2000
Key concepts Residual activity
Resistance as a continuum Lower cut-off = Level of resistance beyond which response begins to fall off Upper cut-off = Level of resistance beyond which clinical response is lost Zone of intermediate response Response Resistance
Partial treatment interruption in patients with resistance reveals residual activity Week 2 change in VL 1.0 Change in plasma viral load 0.5 0.0 –0.5 NRTI PI NNRTI T20 Discontinued treatment class Deeks, CROI 2005
Key principles of resistance • Resistance moves along a continuumand increasing numbers of mutations lead to progressive loss of responses • Residual activity is possible despite the presence of extensive resistance(best evidence for the NRTIs) • Resistance carries a fitness cost that reduces viral replication • Antagonistic effects between mutations can have beneficial effects
Clinical implications for patients with treatment failure • The likelihood of drug-resistance depends upon the drug, the regimen and the level of adherence • When selecting a new regimen, aim for at least 2 fully active drugs • Avoid functional monotherapy with drugs that have a low genetic barrier • If options are limited, exploit residual activity and hypersusceptibility effects – continue the NRTIs rather than stopping therapy