1 / 15

Optimizing borrowing capacity of local government Frédéric AUDRAS Program Manager

Optimizing borrowing capacity of local government Frédéric AUDRAS Program Manager Local authorities and urban development department.  Breakdown of the presentation:. 1. Main steps to evaluate borrowing capacities of LG. 2. Main issues: LG still an “unknown” entity. 3.

jadzia
Download Presentation

Optimizing borrowing capacity of local government Frédéric AUDRAS Program Manager

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Optimizing borrowing capacity of local government Frédéric AUDRAS Program Manager Local authorities and urban development department

  2. Breakdown of the presentation: 1 Main steps to evaluate borrowing capacities of LG 2 Main issues: LG still an “unknown” entity 3 A comprehensive and long term financial approach 4 Case study with the City of Dakar (Senegal) 5 PEFA approach as a referent methodology for LG

  3. 1 Main steps Evaluation of borrowing capacities of LG • Institutional context: decentralisation process in the institutional framework, legal capacity to borrow (domestic and external borrowing), indebtedness limits, financial autonomy of LGs, possible guarantees (debt repayment), • Organizational context of LG: administrative capacities (skilled and experienced staff), financial information system, accountability system, certified accounts, • Political context: Master Plan (urban planning) • Financial capacities: classic financial assessment, risk analysis (including currency risk) => rating (rating agency or internal rating)

  4. 2 Main issues LG: still an “unknown” entity • Financial assessment: LG often considered as “Central government services” => Inappropriate financial tools (calculation of fiscal balances, debt ratios, cash on hands…) • Donors are cautious: implementation of Municipal Funds as a preliminary step => Way to reinforce decentralisation process but no direct dialogue with LG leaders and no real transfer of responsibilities • Donors favour most populated cities (State or regional capitals), which exacerbates financial inequities within a country of a region: direct loan with Central Government guarantee and / or credit line to local banks to finance LG

  5. Classic types of financial support for LG Central government Loans / Subsidies Loans / Subsidies Donors Municipal Fund Support of a reliable fiscal decentralization Loans / Subsidies LG & municipal companies Loans Loans Specialized financial institution Local banks Loans / Subsidies Loans Donors Loans Support of LG direct access to financial markets

  6. 3 New approach A comprehensive and long term financial approach based on PEFA methodology 1/4 • PEFA methodology as a comprehensive approach: PEFA first used to evaluate financial performances of States (Ex: European Commission => PEFA & budgetary support for EDF project implementation) • PEFA studies for LG can provide: • a global evaluation of local public finances system, • an evaluation on a long term (every 3-4 years) to identify progress (better rating for weak component), • an objective diagnostic to implement an coordinated Action Plan (stakeholders: Central government, LG, national audit office)

  7. 3 New approach PEFA study’s place in a reform cycle of Local Public Financial Management (LPFM) 2/4 LPFM Implementation of LPFM reforms LPFM reforms (short & long term Objectives) Financial & risk assessment Recommendations & measures to be taken Identification of main weaknesses Analysis of causes

  8. 3 PEFA methodology Six dimensions taken into account 3/4 • Credibility of the budget: the budget shall be realistic and executed as planned, • Comprehensiveness and transparency: complete follow-up of financial risks, communication of budget and financial information to public, • Policy-based budgeting: according to local public policies voted by local assemblies, • Predictability and control in budget execution: existing of mechanisms and procedures, • Accounting recording and reporting: adapted accounting system, perfect recording (paper – numeric) • External scrutiny and audit: certification and / or national public office

  9. 3 PEFA methodology Three categories for indicators 4/4 • Outputs of financial management system: immediate outputs (to be compared with expected expenditures and revenues), amount of arrears and “debts”, • Cross-cutting issues of financial management system: capacity to produce full information at every step of budget cycle (budget, execution, final account), • Budget cycle: performance of each system, process and entities participating in the budget cycle of the LG.

  10. 4 City of Dakar General context and issues 1/4 General context • Reinforcement of fiscal decentralisation process in Senegal • Improvement of street lighting in poorest districts of Dakar • Need for capacity building for technical and financial staff of Dakar Issues at stake • First direct external lending to a LG in Senegal: processes & mechanisms to define and implement • Bad fiscal reputation of local public sector • No reliable fiscal analysis • IMF constraints: financial conditions to respect to grant an external loan in foreign currency

  11. 4 City of Dakar The need for a long term partnership 2/4 • Urban planning: technical support (foreign and local consultants + French city cooperation), training for staff and municipal councillors, geographical information system, • Financial management: PEFA study (with PPIAF support): not a rating but an internal tool to evaluate and improve Dakar’s management capacities and its direct partners,  Financial Management Action Plan: training for staff and executives (financial analysis, investment planning), final objective is direct access to commercial loans / bonds, • Design of a specific financial architecture to grant a loan to Dakar (10 M€ + 7 M USD) without State guarantee

  12. 4 City of Dakar PEFA study: a short time process 3/4 • May 2008: presentation of PEFA methodology to Dakar, concept paper, request for financing to PPIAF (SNTA program dedicated to sub sovereign entities), • June 2008: submission to PPIAF, approval, tender for consultants, • July – August 2008: selection of consultants • October 2008: First workshop in Dakar with all stakeholders • End of January 2009: Last workshop – final report – presentation to press & TV Next steps: Financial Management Action Plan (July 2009 – municipal elections took place in March 2009)

  13. 4 City of Dakar Impacts of PEFA study 4/4 • Focus on the weaknesses of the local public finances system: shared responsibilities with Central government (administration of public funds, tax collection, accounting system, human resources…) • Identification and prioritization of difficulties to solve • Dedicated team with a clear mandate • Provides useful financial data for City partners: donors, commercial banks, companies, population  Common data base • Reinforce strong dialogue upon fiscal decentralisation (realistic and wishful changes)

  14. 5 Next steps PEFA approach as a referent methodology for LG in African countries • PEFA studies to be implemented in Ouagadougou, Cotonou, Lomé, Nairobi and several cities in Ghana, • Opportunities to: • Create a South-South network of “good financial management practices”, • Reinforce fiscal decentralisation processes in Africa, • Change mentalities of donors: financing LG in developing countries through a long term support based on a comprehensive approach, • Support, on a regional basis or at a national level, the creation of Specialised Financial Institutions dedicated to finance LG and provide them adequate support

  15. Thank you for your attention 15

More Related