1 / 14

Gimli Glider Incident Investigation

Gimli Glider Incident Investigation. By Lee Xuan Hong. Overview. In this investigation, we will find out what the incident is about and why the incident occurred. Summary of Incident(1).

jael-benson
Download Presentation

Gimli Glider Incident Investigation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Gimli Glider Incident Investigation By Lee Xuan Hong

  2. Overview • In this investigation, we will find out what the incident is about and why the incident occurred.

  3. Summary of Incident(1) • Gimli glider is the nickname of the Air Canada aircraft, which was involved in an incident due to maintenance errors. • Air Canada Flight 143, a Boeing 767-200 jet (Gimli glider), ran out of fuel at 26 000 feet high when it was halfway through its journey to Edmonton via Ottawa from Montreal.

  4. Summary of Incident(2) • However, the flight crew successfully glided the aircraft to an emergency landing safely. • The aircraft was nicknamed Gimli glider because it glided to a landing at Gimli Industrial Park Airport.

  5. Date of Incident July 23 1983

  6. Timeline Day before Incident Day of Incident Aircraft flew from Toronto to Edmonton Aircraft flew from A pre-flight inspection was Edmonton to Montreal, made by a maintenance then from Montreal to engineer for the next flight Edmonton. (incident the next day occurred)

  7. Day before Incident • The aircraft flew from Toronto to Edmonton where it underwent routine checks. • The engineer there noticed that the Fuel Quantity Indicator System (FQIS) was not working unless he disabled one of the 2 measuring sensors. By doing so, the fuel gauges in the cockpit were restored to working order but with only 1 FQIS measuring sensor operative.

  8. Day of Incident(1) • The aircraft flew to Montreal from Edmonton. Before the plane departed, the engineer informed the pilot of the problem with the FQIS and that the fuel in the tanks would have to be checked with the floatstick (an instrument used to measure fuel for aircrafts). • The pilot however, misunderstood and thought that the plane had been flown with the fault the previous day.

  9. Day of Incident(2) • On arriving at Montreal, there was a crew change for the return flight back to Edmonton. The outgoing pilot informed Captain Pearson and First Officer Quintal of the problem with the FQIS and passed on his mistaken belief that the plane was flown the previous day with this problem. In a further misunderstanding, Captain Pearson believed that the FQIS had been totally unserviceable. • An engineer who was investigating the problem with the FQIS re-enabled the measuring sensor which was originally disabled in order to test the system. As a result, the fuel gauges in the cockpit went blank. It was then when the engineer was called away, forgetting to disable the measuring sensor.

  10. Day of Incident(3) • As a result, Captain Pearson wasn’t surprised to see blank fuel gauges when he entered the cockpit. Thus, they measured the fuel via floatstick. It was then when they made a critical error…

  11. Conversion Error • As fuel was added to the aircraft, a conversion error was made. Correct CalculationWrong Calculation (A litre of fuel was 0.803kg) Weight of 1 litre of fuel in pounds7682 litres × 0.803 = 6169 kg Weight of fuel 7682 litres x 1.77 = 13597 kg 22300 kg − 6169 kg = 16131 kg already in plane 22300 kg – 13597 kg = 8703kg16131 kg ÷ 0.803 = 20088 litres 8703 kg ÷ 1.77 kg = 4916 litres of fuel of fuel to be transferred to be transferred Fuel requirement of 22300 kg for the plane. 7682 litres of fuel already in the tanks Weight Required Instead, of 20088 litres, 4916 litres of fuel was transferred. The same error was made when the plane stopped for refueling at Ottawa. Thus, the plane left for Edmonton with no chance of reaching there.

  12. Running out of Fuel and Landing • Therefore, the plane ran out of fuel at 26000 feet altitude. • Fortunately, Captain Pearson was an experienced glider pilot and he executed a forward slip to increase drag and lose altitude so that the aircraft will descend more quickly. He “stood” on the brakes as soon as the wheels touched the runway. • The nose of the aircraft scraped against the runway as the nose wheel was forced back into its well. • None of the passengers were seriously hurt.

  13. Conclusion • After investigation, the reasons of the air crash were found to be:-Wrong conversion factor used-Carelessness of the engineers-Misunderstanding between the previous pilot and Captain Pearson • In other words, a chain of minor human errors led to this incident.

  14. The End Thank You : ) Hope You Enjoyed My Presentation Sources: Wikipedia, Google, http://mattstodayinhistory.blogspot.com/2010/07/gimli-glider-july-23-1983.html

More Related