70 likes | 183 Views
(Bad) News from Cracks. Robert Zitoun Stony Brook and LAPP CAT Force Meeting May 27, 2003. New Track Matching. CC dh vs h (mod 0.1). CC dj vs j (mod 0.2). 1cm. no↑ crack ↑no. Rewrite track matching code to allow for better resolution
E N D
(Bad) News from Cracks Robert Zitoun Stony Brook and LAPP CAT Force Meeting May 27, 2003 R. Zitoun, Stony Brook and LAPP CAT force Meeting
New Track Matching CC dh vs h (mod 0.1) CC dj vs j (mod 0.2) 1cm no↑ crack ↑no • Rewrite track matching code to allow for better resolution • h modulation ± 5 mm. Period 0.05 (EM3 period) • j modulation ± 5 mm. Period 0.2 (crack period) • Note: extrapolation made with ET.Have to correct ET in the crack torecover same field integral R. Zitoun, Stony Brook and LAPP CAT force Meeting
How wide is the crack • Crack with calo position(standard) • Correct calo position • Extrapolate tracks and plot trackj (mod 0.2)Loss smaller than previously thought • Moreover: analyzed clusters are matched by present tracking (might be even better) cluster angle corrected cluster angle track angle R. Zitoun, Stony Brook and LAPP CAT force Meeting
Energy Loss in the Crack • Oleg gauss(20%, s = 15mrad) • Best (mass) gauss(21%, s = 16mrad) • “mine” gauss(20%, s = 7mrad) cluster angle corrected cluster angle track angle R. Zitoun, Stony Brook and LAPP CAT force Meeting
Detailed Crack Study • Shower shape affected by crack • Correct cell with gauss(20%, 8 mrad) R. Zitoun, Stony Brook and LAPP CAT force Meeting
Energy correction in the crack • Brute or cell correction equivalent • Not perfect • No effect above 0.02 mrad (even in not corrected angle) track angle cluster angle R. Zitoun, Stony Brook and LAPP CAT force Meeting
Z mass crack>0.05 91.3 GeV 3.1±0.3% smallest distance to crack→ • p13.05 + p13.06 + r13.06 (jonas) • certified + matched • still 1.7 GeV mass differenceclose/far crack • not the crack itself? statistics? crack<0.05 89.6 GeV 3.6±0.2% R. Zitoun, Stony Brook and LAPP CAT force Meeting