80 likes | 236 Views
Student engagement. A bit of a slippery slope…. National developments. QAA Code of Practice on student engagement (B5) Willett’s world drives consumerist thinking –as does the NUS with Which? QAA Institutional Review theme HEFCE review of NSS
E N D
Student engagement A bit of a slippery slope…..
National developments • QAA Code of Practice on student engagement (B5) • Willett’s world drives consumerist thinking –as does the NUS with Which? • QAA Institutional Review theme • HEFCE review of NSS • Ongoing research development (HEA, QAA, institutional research)
QAA research • Camille Kandiko (King’s) on what students really think about engagement • Van der Velden, Botas, Naidoo and Lowe on institutional engagement with students • Interest in student engagement in Trans National Education (QAA slant)
Early findings Not yet quotable or fully verified
Some outstanding practices • Training and development of representatives –not just sabbs • Annual analysis of SSLC discussions • Discussion about paying reps • Tone of institutional engagement (killer question!) • International students no longer excluded group in terms of representation
NSS review (HEFCE) • NSS stays till at least 2015 • Several research projects on data interrogation • Piloting of NSSE and NSSE type questions in institutions (HEA) • Engagement seen as way forward: with learning, with environment, with institution
Performance indicators • Own success criteria • Outcomes of engaged development (causality presumed) • NSS B6 additional bank of questions • NSSE questions usage or similar • % of reps in student population (1 in 20)
What’s next? • Risk of stagnation around institutional practices and programme level engagement (enhancement and development? Strategic development?) • Mimetic learning • Following the new NSS (behaviourist engagement) • Willetts, review of HE agencies, student numbers market