150 likes | 163 Views
Explore the politics of forest industries in Northern regions amid globalization, focusing on image production, evolving industry regimes, and shareholder value. Delve into forest industry shifts in Canada, the Nordic countries, and Russia, analyzing the impacts of concentration, M&A activities, and changing market dynamics. Uncover the influence of shareholder value on labor-management relations, forest regimes, and industry homogenization trends, with insights into challenges and opportunities shaping the future landscape. Discover the interplay between regional diversity, environmental concerns, and economic factors in the global forest industry arena.
E N D
Politics of Forests: Northern Forest Industry Regimes in the Age of Globalisation Bjørnar Sæther
Three topics • Forest industry as motors of forest based internationalisation • Image production as modifier of material production • Changes in regional forest industry regimes
Three regions • Canada (east and west) • The Nordic countries (Finland, Sweden and Norway) • Russia (east and west)
Developments among forest industrial companies • Concentration and restructuring of the major companies in N-America and Europe • M&A across the Atlantic • European and N-American investment in Asia (S-Korea, China, Thailand)
Nordic forest industry • Has established a dominat position within the European forest industry • Has acquired production capacity in N-America ( Consolidated Paper, Blandin, Fletcher Paper) • Has established production capacity in Asia (China, S-Korea, Thailand) • Has increased its global influence
Why concentration? • Increase shareholder value through higher and more stable profit across the business cycle • Concentration increases market power vs. publishers (for printing paper) • Flexibility and economies of scale • Cost reduction i.e. transport
Forest regimes • Regimes consist of actors that influence the development of the forest industrial sector; companies, suppliers, customers, authorities, finance and NGOs
Concentration vs. forest regimes • How does these changes in the structure of the forest industry influence the forest industrial regimes? • Shareholders vs. other stakeholder groups like labor • Homogenisation of the regional forest industrial models ?
Shareholder value • The influence of shareholder value as a management paradigm has been marked on both sides of the Atlantic • Nordic producers have adjusted towards Anglo-American practices in dealing with shareholders and the financial community
Increases in payment of dividend among Nordic producers • Constant dividend when profit is low • One shareholder class • Reduced importance of supervisory boards
Labor-management • Good relations between labor and management has been a source of competitveness to Nordic industry • Labor representatives have seats on the board in Sweden and Norway • Influence of shareholder value threatens these relations with focus on cost cutting
Some reports of import of Nordic labor-management practices to British Columbia • Global agreement between Norske Skog and International Federation of Chemical Workers which gives right to collective bargaining and minimum health and safety standards
Homogenisation • A trend towards homogenisation between Canada and the Nordic countries in: • Labor- management relations • Influence of shareholder values • Trend towards homogenisation is supported by debates on sustainable forestry practices
Diversity • Regional material flows • Country specific political-institutional structures • Forest ownership • Sunk costs • Differences in environmental concern • Competition between places for new investment
Conclusion • One or several forest-industrial regimes? • To early to declare the death of the Nordic model • Still strong Soviet legacy in Russia • Canadian forest industry under pressure from US and environmentalists